This post is so incoherent that the only response i can give you is this. In fact, your posts today have convinced me that this site will be far more worthwhile if i never read one of your posts again. Goodbye.
No, a probable chip could have been the reason. The actually seen question, and not final protective line, was on similarities that could be drawn between today and the team fielded by the Cowboys, in '92. I started a proposal for comparison, and then developed topical discussion lines about that.
I drew comparison between the DC and OC then, and the pair that Dallas has now...as they lead the cook staff in the kitchen, once the food is selected.
I compared the pair then: Dave Wannstedt and Norv Turner, to today's: Rod Marinelli and Scott Linehan.
I brought out a Triplet comparison, and even pointed to better strength in the supporting members of today's positional group.
I then stated that today's offensive line, with the exception of Doug Free was on equal if not sounder ground than the group assembled for the '92 season...the point of transition for that Cowboys' team.
I agree, a stereotyped response system probably can't stand the jolt of comparing the two in a simple, but logical comparison between the two.
As to the defensive side of the ball, with the exception of Charles Haley, that may or may not be replicated with the newly drafted Demarcus Lawrence, the skillsets as to drafted talent levels are actually pretty similar. A healthy return of Anthony Spencer, T McClain, Henry Melton, and Tyrone Crawford could greatly affect how this comparison with that of '92...runs. Add in a productive Lawrence later, and the comparison gets quite a bit closer, in this first transitional season with the current Cowboys.
I left the secondary, as a topic that if someone actually wanted some discussion, to start swaying a debate, could have been used if that were preferred.
No, there is no problem in connecting what was actually presented...but if one is saying good bye to a solid discussion topic, then that is upon that person.
As to using the label of placing on ignore, I recommend that strongly. I would have to then start reporting postings such as this, that was based upon personality rejection. That belongs in one's OWN mind, and not mixed as intended insult rather than discussion. This site still supports discussion, but that doesn't included stereotyped responses as frequent as no Jerry, no Romo, no Garrett, and nothing replaces the '92 - '95 Cowboys team, in today's view. Sorry, that isn't a discussion, and insult is not a discussion...which here, is still a negative action.
If one desires isolation...pursue that aspect. But don't hide behind a sign of failure and lack of intelligence. That shows further, prejudice in discussion...take one's own path, but stay clear of published insult.
I presented a valid and unused topic for discussion, and that is a positive element. If one doesn't like that, then confront topic, but not with an intentioned stereotyped that even a 'mad hatter' would find socially insultive in origin...can't follow more than a single topic in development, then that is back on an observer.