Bay10
ehcrossing
- Messages
- 2,181
- Reaction score
- 1,925
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
Simple, Sanchez was signed with the eagles.
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
Due to all of my reasons combined and that includes losing Callahan.........but that is minimal compared to the other reasons IMO.
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
Hard to get big holes consistently vs 8 man boxes
Well, let's look at the backup QBs in the division.
Eagles: Mark Sanchez
Skins: Colt McCoy
Giants: Ryan Nassib
None of those guys are any better than Brandon Weeden.
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
Not only Callahan known for developing a good OLine, he is supposely very maticulous and detail oriented. You can have the same players and same scheme but a coach can make a difference on how they perform on game day.
Callahan is known to make players practice until they get their technique right. Maybe our OL isn't as prapared during the week as they were last year.
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
And yet we got it consistently last year, when they knew we were running it, with essentially the identical line.
And yet we got it consistently last year, when they knew we were running it, with essentially the identical line.
Callahan was the OL coach the last two seasons, but he didn't coach the OL. Frank Pollock was brought on board when Callahan was given the OC position in 2013. He turned the day-to-day details on the OL (technique, teaching, film study, running meetings, etc.) over to Pollock while he (Callahan) spent the vast majority of his time focused on his OC duties. In 2014, Callahan's title changed to "Co-OC, Running Game", and start OL had to allot a bunch of time to those duties. Once again, Pollock handled the detailed aspects of coaching the OL. In other words, Pollock was the OL coach in everything except title.
I believe the majority of the OL's problems can be attributed to mathematics. Five of them, going up against eight- (and sometimes nine-) man fronts. The only way we see any change in that is for Linehan/Garrett to take the wraps off of whoever lines up at QB, and makes them chuck it downfield. Until that happens, it won't get any better.
It is a combination of everything:
1. predictability on offense
2. no running game
3. no QB
4. no WR's
5. coaching, which goes back around to #1
Romo is what makes this team click and nothing else. He is the lone bright spot since those SB years and is the reason that we have sniffed the playoffs.
Jerry says its a thing of beauty watching # 3 throw the pigskin. I'm thinking Jerry was 3/4's drunk when he slurred those infamous words.
Bingo!!!!
But to put a finer point on it.....Go back and watch some Raiders O-line tape from last year...then look @ us now....see anything familar? Yup....can't run block. We have made some changes to the scheme.. And not for the better. This zone blocking stretch play that was our bread and butter last year...teams are blowing it up w/ penetration. Guys aren't sustaining any blocks...and we aren't getting any movement either. We have completely become a finess blocking scheme overnight.
OK, well, at that point, you have to question why the head coach and FO went with Weeden instead of a stud like Mark Sanchez,
Not only Callahan known for developing a good OLine, he is supposely very maticulous and detail oriented. You can have the same players and same scheme but a coach can make a difference on how they perform on game day.
Callahan is known to make players practice until they get their technique right. Maybe our OL isn't as prapared during the week as they were last year.