Nightman
Capologist
- Messages
- 27,121
- Reaction score
- 24,038
I never saw an issue with the old rule about what was a catch. Who decided that the "two feet down and possession" rule should be changed? And why did they change it? Sure it was a judgement call, but so is the current rule. Even more so IMO.
That is it. It shouldn't matter after 2 feet down anywhere on the field, sideline or endzone.
Then the regular fumble, down by contact and breaking the plane rules apply.
CJohnson- TD as soon as second foot or knee hits
Dez- catch, down by contact on the one
Tate- TD as soon as second foot hits and he still has the ball since he already broke the plane
Eifert- TD as soon as it broke the plane
Maclin- catch, would have been down by contact if inbounds
Butch Johnson SB XII- TD as soon as elbow/shoulder hit as ball was across the plane. If in the field of play it would be a catch and a fumble since he wasn't down by contact.
Last edited: