Bob Sturm Blog: Football 301: Decoding Garrett - Week 15

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,630
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Monday, December 21, 2009

Football 301: Decoding Garrett - Week 15




You know what is funny about pro football? A man's career can turn on 1 day if that day has enough profile and impact.

I wonder if Jason Garrett's finest night in 2009 will start the wheels turning back in his direction as it pertains to the "hot assistant names" around the league. Think about it, you know him as a guy who frustrates you on occasion. But, around the league, he is the guy who put the plan together to tame the Saints in front of their home fans. Well done.

Back on August 18th , I wrote about the "12" personnel plans in both Dallas and Green Bay - something that has come to pass as one of the big trends in the NFL. It is interesting to see how the Packers have used it enhance their passing game by helping Finley bust out into a major downfield threat, and the Cowboys have used it to enhance its running game and to find good balance in its attack.

Check out Saturday Night, as we see the beauty of "12" even without Bennett on the roster. John Phillips, a draft-day afterthought, fills in for Bennett the last 2 weeks, and the "12" group has 16 snaps for 184 yards. Nearly 12 yards per snap! That is what we call devastating.

The Under Center/Shotgun balance was also perfect (41/31), with S11 being used primarily as 2-min and 3rd Down, but then "12" and "22" got cooking and did its thing.

Here is the breakdown by groupings:

Totals by Personnel Groups:
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-personnel15.gif

[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]


Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here .



When doing these breakdowns, there is so much information and we tend to read meaning into all of it based on the simple results (did they win or did they lose?). If they won, everything they did was great. If they lose, everything they did was wrong. I try not to fall into this trap, but in this particular game, I believe they got the game plan right. They mixed in the deep ball well. Many plays set up the next play. The Quarterback carried out the plan.

But, do I only feel that way because it worked? Do you? Do we congratulate Jason Garrett based on DeMarcus Ware getting a sack and fumble to save the game? Food for thought as we prepare for Washington.

Video Breakdowns:

Thanks, Brian at DC Fanatic.com . He made his phone-in debut to BaD Radio yesterday, and deserves your occasional visit to his site.

-----------------------------------------------------
The Play:1Q - 1/10/O49 - TD to Austin

[youtube]m4lHzjxh9dA[/quote]

What Happened: Just a thing of beauty - the return of the long ball and the "9" route. It starts with the Cowboys showing run in with "12" personnel and the unbalanced line. I am not positive the run/pass splits out of the unbalanced line, but it is almost all run. The Saints know this, so it looks like a smashmouth play in presnap. A little play action, and a great job of holding the edge rush by John Phillips. Once this happens, it is a question of whether Austin can run past 27 Malcolm Jenkins and whether Romo's throw can beat the safety over to the spot. Yes, and yes. Touchdown. This play call only works on 1st and 10, and this is a perfect idea of how the running game sets up the pass because you must respect 1st and 10 as a defense. They did, and the Cowboys unleashed one on them.

------------------------------------------------------------

The Play:3Q - 3/5/D31 - Pass to Austin for 13 yards "S12"
[youtube]Fbnn4vOr7Rk[/youtube]

What Happened: Again, a sliding protection scheme, that is all about just getting everyone to go to the offensive right and then at the same time the QB comes back left with his throw to receivers that also are cutting back to the left. This works very well in man coverage, and from the End Zone cameras (and by the way, full compliments to the NFL Network for all of these nice end zone views to really break these plays down) you can see that Ogletree is even more open, and if Romo sees/trusts him on this play, there may be a Touchdown available. Instead, they take 13 yards to Austin and keep the drive alive. Also, please notice John Phillips and his odd technique of turning his back to the pass rusher a bit and boxing him out like they are fighting for a rebound in basketball. Whatever works, I guess. Another play that many QB's can't run, but Romo is athletic enough to buy another second.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Play: 3Q - 1/10/D44 - Run Feliz 9 yards "22"

[youtube]CB_5BbOfuYk[/youtube]
What Happened: You have seen this play on Football 301 all season, "22" personnel, Power play to the right where Witten and Leonard Davis are the big blockers to open up an easy 9 yards on 1st down. The Cowboys true go-to move. But, what makes this a play you will want to review again and again has to be the Leonard Davis block on Jonathan Vilma. Vilma is one heck of a LB, but he is only flesh and bones, and when Bigg gets around the corner with a head of steam, Vilma is tossed a good 3 yards in the air. Bigg has not been what I had hoped this season, but like Larry Allen, even when he is not awesome, he is still pretty impressive in certain spots.

------------------------------------------

The Play: 3Q - 3/1/O6 - Barber 4 yards to O2 "22"

[youtube]HuEphHDkwCk[/youtube]

What Happened: This play, short yardage down by the goal-line, is meant to merely remind us of how San Diego should have gone. Now, maybe, a week of ridicule and criticism inspired everyone to push a bit harder this week, but this is what you do on 3rd and 1. 22 personnel, Davis, Gurode pushing forward! Barber sees one guy he must take on (42 Sharper) and he runs him forward a few yards. Where was this last week? 10 in the box? Doesn't matter when you only need a yard. Well done, but where was that?

------------------------------------------
The Play: 4Q - 3/7/D23 - 32 yard pass to Austin "S11"

[youtube]3YcvQqMWYpM[/youtube]

What Happened: I suggest to you that if the Cowboys don't convert this 3rd and 7, the Cowboys do not win. 6:30 to go, clinging to a 7 point lead, and the Superdome is going bananas. This is the play that may have turned the season. Of course, Folk missed the eventual chippy, but, still here is the play. Millen says the Saints called off the blitz, but I still see 6 Saints trying to get to Romo so that is a blitz. Austin demonstrates the fear that he has put in the league with the cushion he is given, and it is an easy 1st down, but because of the throw and the effor by Patrick Crayton it turns into 32 yards. Austin is so fast going across the field and this is what you must make happen to win in this league. Money down, easy conversion. If you were to list the Top 5 most important offensive plays of 2009, how many are Romo to Austin? 4? And the best news is that they hook up on the road constantly: KC, Philly, New Orleans.

http://sturminator.blogspot.com/2009/12/football-301-decoding-garrett-week-15.html#more
 

goliadmike

reader of rue
Messages
995
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;3164257 said:
Check out Saturday Night, as we see the beauty of "12" even without Bennett on the roster. John Phillips, a draft-day afterthought, fills in for Bennett the last 2 weeks, and the "12" group has 16 snaps for 184 yards. Nearly 12 yards per snap! That is what we call devastating.

12 yards a play from the "12" package that's just awesome!!!
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
WoodysGirl;3164257 said:
If you were to list the Top 5 most important offensive plays of 2009, how many are Romo to Austin? 4? And the best news is that they hook up on the road constantly: KC, Philly, New Orleans.

Austin steps up big on the road and at home. Dude is a stud and IMO is the best WR in the NFCE.
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,611
Reaction score
20,819
viman96;3164351 said:
Austin steps up big on the road and at home. Dude is a stud and IMO is the best WR in the NFCE.

take the rose colored glasses off
Desean Jackson is better than Austin..
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,630
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The Quest for Six;3164360 said:
take the rose colored glasses off
Desean Jackson is better than Austin..
Why does he have to take off his rose-colored glasses?

He's entitled to believe whatever he wants...and it doesn't hurt anybody for him to believe that Austin is the better receiver.

IMO, I think they're both pretty good, but as an all around receiver, Austin may have the edge.
 

chuffly

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,079
Reaction score
115
The Quest for Six;3164360 said:
take the rose colored glasses off
Desean Jackson is better than Austin..

Do the stats wear rose-colored glasses too? Because Miles Austin has him bested in just about every statistical category possible this year.
 

goliadmike

reader of rue
Messages
995
Reaction score
0
The Quest for Six;3164360 said:
take the rose colored glasses off
Desean Jackson is better than Austin..

Not so fast there Quest.

It probably depends on what you want in a receiver. Let’s look at the numbers.


Austin has more receptions 65 to Jackson’s 56.

Austin has more yards 1, 138 to 1,087.

Austin has more touchdowns 11 to Jackson’s 8.

Austin has more 20+ yard receptions 20 to Jackson’s 17.

Austin has more 1st downs 48 to Jackson’s 36.

Now what Jackson has over Austin he has a higher average per reception 19.4 to Austin’s 17.5.

Jackson has better yards per game 83.6 to Austin’s 81.3.

Jackson has more 40+ yard receptions 10 to Austin’s 7.

One other thing in Austin’s favor is Jackson has 2 fumbles while Austin has only 1 fumble.

Overall, I’ll take Austin for his touchdowns, first downs, and consistency.
 

pancakeman

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,171
Reaction score
2,856
These breakdown threads are just awesome.

I loved seeing Bigg throw that LB into the air like a rag doll, and that's the kind of detail that I'd miss without this analysis.
:bow: :bow: :bow:
 

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
Garrett probably already digesting this article ready for the Washington game. :)
 

poost

Well-Known Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
402
Austin is no doubt a better receiver than DeSean Jackson, but you ahve to take into account the impact Jackson has on special teams. As for me, I'll take Austin over any receiver in the NFCE anyday.
 

sonnyboy

Benched
Messages
7,357
Reaction score
0
poost;3164503 said:
Austin is no doubt a better receiver than DeSean Jackson, but you ahve to take into account the impact Jackson has on special teams. As for me, I'll take Austin over any receiver in the NFCE anyday.


Do you know what I think Reid and Garrett would say if you asked them this question?

Can I have both?:D

Now that would be something. Their skills sets really do complement each other well.

But I have to admit that Jackson is more valuable. What he brings to the table is just so hard to find. Forget about the special teams for a sec. What he gives you from the LOS is enough alone.
When you factor in the punt returns, it's a done deal.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,947
Reaction score
23,096
goliadmike;3164423 said:
Not so fast there Quest.

It probably depends on what you want in a receiver. Let’s look at the numbers.


Austin has more receptions 65 to Jackson’s 56.

Austin has more yards 1, 138 to 1,087.

Austin has more touchdowns 11 to Jackson’s 8.

Austin has more 20+ yard receptions 20 to Jackson’s 17.

Austin has more 1st downs 48 to Jackson’s 36.

Now what Jackson has over Austin he has a higher average per reception 19.4 to Austin’s 17.5.

Jackson has better yards per game 83.6 to Austin’s 81.3.

Jackson has more 40+ yard receptions 10 to Austin’s 7.

One other thing in Austin’s favor is Jackson has 2 fumbles while Austin has only 1 fumble.

Overall, I’ll take Austin for his touchdowns, first downs, and consistency.
You forgot another important stat. Games Started: Austin 7edit(10, nfl.com list 7 must of started with a package excluding him) Jackson 13
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,961
Reaction score
37,481
The Under Center/Shotgun balance was also perfect (41/31), with S11 being used primarily as 2-min and 3rd Down, but then "12" and "22" got cooking and did its thing.

Absolutely love it...
 

yimyammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,574
Reaction score
7,004
chuffly;3164398 said:
Do the stats wear rose-colored glasses too? Because Miles Austin has him bested in just about every statistical category possible this year.

Where can I buy these rose-colored glasses?
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,871
Reaction score
15,969
The difference between DeSean Jackson and Miles Austin is size.

If I hit DeSean Jackson he'd be knocked into next week. Austin shrugs off tackles and will hit people. No question which guy is the better blocker of the two.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,871
Reaction score
15,969
yimyammer;3165288 said:
Where can I buy these rose-colored glasses?

any place they sell a clue or house statistics.

pretty sure you can get them on fire sale in the superdome.
 

yimyammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,574
Reaction score
7,004
goliadmike;3164423 said:
Not so fast there Quest.

It probably depends on what you want in a receiver. Let’s look at the numbers.


Austin has more receptions 65 to Jackson’s 56.

Austin has more yards 1, 138 to 1,087.

Austin has more touchdowns 11 to Jackson’s 8.

Austin has more 20+ yard receptions 20 to Jackson’s 17.

Austin has more 1st downs 48 to Jackson’s 36.

Now what Jackson has over Austin he has a higher average per reception 19.4 to Austin’s 17.5.

Jackson has better yards per game 83.6 to Austin’s 81.3.

Jackson has more 40+ yard receptions 10 to Austin’s 7.

One other thing in Austin’s favor is Jackson has 2 fumbles while Austin has only 1 fumble.

Overall, I’ll take Austin for his touchdowns, first downs, and consistency.

What's scary is we could have had both.

Imagine a hind-sight draft where we grab Chris Johnson and DeSean Jackson instead of Felix and Bennet, then if we don't make the trade for Roy we could have picked up MIchael Oher or Percy Harvin and still could grab Mike Wallace with the 3rd we gave to Detroit.

I know, I know, hindsight's 20-20, but Oh how sweet it could have been
 

yimyammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,574
Reaction score
7,004
jterrell;3165320 said:
any place they sell a clue or house statistics.

pretty sure you can get them on fire sale in the superdome.

lol..can't afford a clue, but I've got one on lay-away
 
Top