Bob's Blog - Football 301: Decoding Garrett - Week 10

BBQ101

Active Member
Messages
579
Reaction score
98
taken from: http://sturminator.blogspot.com/2009/11/football-301-decoding-garrett-week-10.html

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Football 301: Decoding Garrett - Week 10

math-300x213.jpg


I do this project not because it makes any money or because it is something I have to do - but rather, I compile these numbers (with help from a few friends) every week so that we have substance behind opinions. It is easy to say that "Jason Garrett had a horrible Sunday", but if you don't have any substance from the whole season with which to compare it to, you are merely making an observation that may or may not have merit.

I believe the whole point of this exercise is to be able to break down a game like Sunday and point to specific issues with his job performance - good and bad - and offer an "exit interview" from each week like I assume they do in coaches meetings at Valley Ranch.

I have also heard this week that it wasn't the fault of the play calls, it was the fault of the exectution on those play calls. I don't completely disagree, because the exectution was poor (Williams fumble and drop, Romo's decision to force ball to Witten, OL getting beat badly in pass protect), but the concept of going on the road as a team that has demonstrated they are deadly out of their base offense, and abandon it completely when the score was still 0-0, or 3-0, is a big issue.

We keep these numbers to point out that week after week, despite the popular opinion that the Cowboys are "good" at Shotgun-3 WR offense (S11), the facts are they are not good. And when they get in a position where it becomes their bread and butter, the opponent begins to salivate and plots exotic blitz after exotic blitz to expose and attack the pass protection. Then, the Cowboys counter by leaving Jason Witten and the RB in to help max-protect, and the problems for the offense get even worse because their best weapon is no longer in route.

Plain and Simple: Jason Garrett helped lose the game on Sunday by losing the plot of his game plan. I wrote about it extensively in yesterday's game recap , but here is a taste:




You must play against your opponent, not against your expectations. Some weeks, you must win a game that is truly ugly, but to do so, you have to check your expectation-level at the door, and simply play the game in front of you.​

Sunday called for grinding it out and frustrating the defense and crowd with long drives of power football. We got almost none of that.​

They used "13" personnel just 3 times the whole game. "22" personnel just once, aside from the 2 attempts at the "Razorback". Marion Barber had 1 carry after the 1st Quarter, which was a 1-yard loss to start the 2nd half.​

The game was 3-0 into the 4th Quarter, and Jason Garrett abandoned his successful sets because he got antsy, frustrated, and desperate - again. It plays right into the hands of the opponent (when you are in shotgun, it completely changes the posture of the defense), and it is why performances like last Sunday Night in Philadelphia are the exception and not the norm. The norm is that in road-game hostile-situations, if you punch the Cowboys in the mouth a few times (sack Romo, plug up a few run plays) they change their game plan completely on the fly and roll Shotgun set after Shotgun set onto the field.​

What bothers me is we see this time and time again. Garrett doesn't learn to keep his composure and his game plan. For all of his faults of being too conservative, Bill Parcells' teams would not have allowed 2 of the biggest plays of the game (the Clay Matthews sack before halftime and the Charles Woodson sack that sealed the verdict). Why? Because he wouldn't go for risky Shotgun sets in both of those situations.​

The Cowboys know how to handle a track meet. But, a slug fest? Sometimes I wonder if Garrett can handle it.​
Here are the numbers for you to see on Sunday:

Totals by Personnel Groups:
http://i699.***BLOCKED***/albums/vv351/bigbriquaker/packagetotal.jpg

[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]


Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here .

The shocking facts show that the Cowboys ran 13 plays from under center for 51 yards. That is the complete showing for your base-offense. About 4 yards per snap, so it shows that this idea it "wasn't working" is silly. They just panicked. Again.

Then they threw caution to the wind and decided to work the other 45 plays from some form of a shotgun offense. Hopefully, by this point of the season you know what I think of that. The Shotgun offense should be treated like chocolate. In its proper place, it can be the best bite of your eating day, but if it is your full meal for every meal, you have no chance at being healthy.

And don't even start with the "But, Bob, they were down 17!" nonsense. Yes, a big number of those Shotgun snaps were in the 4th Quarter, but the Cowboys gave up on their game plan long before that. They played like they were down 14 when the score was 3-0 at halftime. Marion Barber had 1 carry in the final 3 Quarters! That is exceptionally poor play calling.

And please understand when I say "play calling" I am talking about your presnap look, not your actual run-pass decision. Presnap look with Romo under center gives the Linebackers and Safeties pause about what the Cowboys intent is. Shotgun Romo gives the defense no pause whatsoever. They are prepared to come in waves. And that explains why 4 sacks were out of the Shotgun sets. The defense accepts your invitation.

Yes, just 1 week after praising the concept of the gameplan of Jason Garrett, I am confused at how badly he lost the plot. Such is life in the NFL.

Check out the video breakdowns, where we highlight good things the offense accomplished. I can only choose from plays in this week's game, so my pickings were pretty slim:

Video Breakdowns:

Thanks, Brian at DC Fanatic.com . He is the man, and deserves your occasional visit to his site.

-----------------------------------------------------
The Play: 12:16 1Q - 1/10/39 - 13, Barber +13
[youtube]NEopsj6b-6s[/youtube]



What Happened: Marion Barber had 5 carries on Sunday, and this was the first one, a run left out of the "13" package, with John Phillips as his F-Back. Because of double tight ends to the Right (off Colombo's shoulder) the Green Bay defense is looking to slide in that direction. Watch 52 Matthews for the Packers (the LB by Adams) take two steps left at the snap and almost taking himself out of the play, even though he surely has contain to his right. Once he does that, Phillips is on him for the seal as Barber takes it off weak side and gets a nice gain for 13. He would get another carry for 7 yards in this drive and then they would ignore him for the rest of the game. I would love to hear an explanation as to why they thought that made even the slightest sense. Does this play look to you like the Cowboys are going to have trouble at the point of attack?

------------------------------------------------------------

The Play: 4:03 2Q - 1/10/37 - S12, pass to Williams +42
[youtube]9fb59wni-to[/youtube]


What Happened: Here is another cool thing about what we do here on Tuesdays. It helps us compare and recognize when the Cowboys dust off a play that worked early in the year and use it again. In week 1, we showed you the long 66-yard TD pass to Roy Williams that was based on Roy Williams pre-snap motion. In Tampa (And, I apologize, but our video from that play in Week 1 does not show the presnap motion), they had Bennett and Witten lined up wide, with the two WR's in the slot. This matched up a safety versus Roy. In Green Bay, they had Witten in to protect, with Bennett on his own by the right sideline. Then, Austin wide left, Roy slot left, with Roy coming in motion to the right, changing the Packers' coverage right into what Romo/Garrett/Cowboys were hoping. 36 Collins trying to run down the center of the field against 11 Williams. Mismatch, great throw, and if it wasn't for the fumble, it is a different game altogether. I don't think they have run this play more than 3 times this year, but twice, it gets exactly what they want and Romo and Williams connect. Sort of.




-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Play: 8:51 3Q - 2/10/20 - WC22, Choice keeps for 11
[youtube]FcHVMLDg8QA[/youtube]


What Happened: Speaking of things we have seen before, remember the lead Wildcat/Razorback play on the goal-line against Phildelphia? Here it is again - exact same play - but from their own 20 yard line. Once again, unbalanced line to the left with Colombo on Adams left, followed by Witten on Colombo's left. Then, Deon Anderson is off-set left in the back field, and Leonard Davis pulls from Right Guard and slams into the hole.

I think the comedy here is watching 70 Davis looking for something to hit and finding 50 AJ Hawk in the hole. Hawk is ready to take on Choice at the point of attack until Davis runs him over. Hawk tries to duck and cover, but the collision is amazingly humorous. I would imagine both teams enjoyed this sequence in the film room. Cowboys gain 11, and 31 Harris tries to pull off Tashard's facemask to add 15 more yards to the run.


------------------------------------------

The Play:13:09 4Q - 1/10/8 - To Williams for 20
[youtube]MIA9NZ_DWd8[/youtube]


What Happened: Here is a play that annoyed me in its philosophy, but since it worked we must only warn them what lies ahead. Down 10-0, but still 13 minutes to play. The Cowboys get the ball at their own 8 yard line, but since Garrett has already thrown his gameplan in the river, they open on 1st and 10 with a shotgun look that keeps Witten in to make sure Romo has enough time to let Williams make his cut and deliver the ball.

It works like a charm, and the aggresive look gets the Cowboys some breathing room, right? In fact, he is only a nice tackle away from a 92 yard touchdown. But, I think it demonstrates how impatient the Cowboys were on Sunday. It is "Fool's gold", because 2 shotgun snaps later, Charles Woodson realizes Witten isn't out in route, so he blitzes and ends the game with a sack. But, this play does make a nice highlight.


------------------------------------------
The Play: 7:55 4Q - 4/10/43 - To Crayton for 14
[youtube]rBMXPSIf_X8[/youtube]


What Happened: I only show you this crazy play out of "S11" to show that Tony Romo can make a great play on his own sometimes. He steps up in the pocket to avoid the rush, and finds Patrick Crayton who doesn't appear to be open on a play that they had to make.

I didn't have much to work with this week, so I will simply show you a nice play by the offense in a sea of plays that weren't nice.

------------------------------------------
Target Distribution and Sack studies will be in another entry today. Stay tuned for that.
------------------------------------------
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
This article just illustrated what many have been saying for months.

What this breakdown says to me is that Garrett, as a play caller, can't handle adversity. That's an encouraging thought heading towards a play-off run, huh?

And some people want this clown as our next head coach.:rolleyes:
 

Shadowy329

Member
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
Love these posts probably the best threads I see in here lately.

and it's very nice to see some cold hard facts behind what alot of people are saying yet others who have Garret in their hearts don't want to see and admit to.

The fact that we went to the same package so many times is rediculous even if it WAS working but it wasn't. Theres only so many ways you can change it up before the defense has it figured out and shuts you down.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
I miss the days of running straight up the gut with I formation. I wish we would do it with Choice, who is pretty damn good at getting at least 4 yards, even against some of the better defenses out there
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
I'll echo the sentiments of some other posters from previous weeks: This guy is the best there is out there of breaking down the Cowboys offense. His contributions to this board (via the person who actually posts them *maybe Bob himself?*) is some of the best stuff around here.

I was actually really interested to see what he would have to say about this game. And it was just as I had thought. Just a well illustrated example of debunking the "we couldn't run the ball or our base offense anymore" garbage argument.

Garret is a front-runner. He's fine as long as he can call a track meet against a team that can't stop him. He faces an opposing coordinator who is willing to take him to task and he panics and folds like a cheap suit. A poster on here nailed it the other day. To summarize: The only way you can stifle a roster with this much talent is with bad coaching. BINGO!
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
Gaede;3084528 said:
I miss the days of running straight up the gut with I formation. I wish we would do it with Choice, who is pretty damn good at getting at least 4 yards, even against some of the better defenses out there

I agree. I'll never forget the performance he had against the Steelers last year. He absolutely dominated that team in both the passing and running game. Scheme helped, but this kid just played with more heart than anyone else on the field, that day. He was just determined to get yardage regardless of the play call or the defensive effort.
 

malbis030347

Active Member
Messages
423
Reaction score
219
these post game analysis are awesome....I think it makes sense to send these analysis each week to the RHG so he can get a better perspective on what he is doing...it is a way of getting a fresh look at things from a factual perspective as opposed to us fans who just resond to what happens with statements like--'we should have run the ball more"...or ' we should have involved Witten in the passing game more"
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Isn't it time to admit that Garrett just sucks????
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
It's official, I suppose. Everyone from Bob Sturm to Wade Phillips has blamed Garrett -- in varying tones of severity -- for this loss.

I appear to have been wrong in my defense of Garrett in the game thread; the loss truly was his fault.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
khiladi;3084615 said:
Isn't it time to admit that Garrett just sucks????
He doesn't "suck".

Jack Reilly "sucked". Maurice Carthon "sucked".

Garrett simply has to mature as a playcaller. I think he is borderline brilliant with some things schematically, but he has a tough time figuring out the ebb and flow of a football game, especially when things do not unfold exactly as planned. That kind of thing really happens often to extremely smart people. Eventually a little intellectual arrogance ends up ruining what should just be common sense.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
khiladi;3084619 said:
Miles Austin bailed Garrett out the past few weeks...


Austin bailed alot of people out the past couple of weeks. Unfortunately, he's being schemed out of the game plan by the opponents (same thing that started happening to T.O.) and the red-headed genius (again) has failed to adapt.

Same story different year.

As much as I've bashed Garrett in this thread, believe it or not, I haven't totally given up on him for this season. He's shown flashes of brilliance. Unfortunately, his gaffes seem to come at the worst times. If we are still seeing this level of incompetence at the end of the season, then it's officially time for the "home boy" experiment to end.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,144
Reaction score
20,600
It's unbelievable that Barber only had one carry after 1st Quarter. That's just mind boggling especially since the score was so close most of the game.
 

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
Well I'm glad a "credible" source confirms what many on here have said - we abandoned the running game and Garrett was out coached.

I think Garrett is a smart guy, I know he is. But being smart doesn't equate to being good.

There are a lot of people that think they can play poker. They're real smart when it comes to knowing what hands to play, what the percentages are, when the pot odds are in their favor. But they still suck at poker.

They lack the intuition of knowing when to bluff, when to bet big, when to check, when to check raise, reading your opponent.

I feel Garrett just lacks that intuition.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
skinsscalper;3084630 said:
Austin bailed alot of people out the past couple of weeks. Unfortunately, he's being schemed out of the game plan by the opponents (same thing that started happening to T.O.) and the red-headed genius (again) has failed to adapt.

Actually I think he has adapted to some extent, at least during the week watching film. Its no coincidence that Roy has had his two most prominent games as a Cowboy the last two weeks. But he keeps dropping the damn ball all over the place (weren't his hands supposed to be a strength of his?).

I do agree and have said many times in the past he is a lousy game day manager. Not sure if that is just a product of inexperience or something he just doesn't have a feel for.
 

802dave

Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
20
I don't think Garrett sucks - he needs help adjusting on the run during a game. Sparano probably was a big help to him that first year. It's a huge shame Dan Reeves didn't work out!
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
802dave;3084740 said:
I don't think Garrett sucks - he needs help adjusting on the run during a game. Sparano probably was a big help to him that first year. It's a huge shame Dan Reeves didn't work out!
There is probably a great deal of truth to this.

Garrett needs a little help. Not a lot, but figuring out the nuances of playcalling is an area for opportunity.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,868
Reaction score
11,569
Alexander;3084629 said:
He doesn't "suck".

Jack Reilly "sucked". Maurice Carthon "sucked".

Garrett simply has to mature as a playcaller. I think he is borderline brilliant with some things schematically, but he has a tough time figuring out the ebb and flow of a football game, especially when things do not unfold exactly as planned. That kind of thing really happens often to extremely smart people. Eventually a little intellectual arrogance ends up ruining what should just be common sense.

Wonder when that will happen. Guys been around the game his whole career and hasn't figured it out yet.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
The problem is, Jason Garrett cannot see the whole field. His most successful season was his first year, when Sparano was in charge of the running game and Garrett could just focus on the passing game.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
Garrett, schematically, obviously knows exactly what he's doing. The problem is that, just as Bob says, he goes into "panic mode" and just throws out the game plan, and more often than not his panic attacks result in shotgun formation.

If Garrett can mature more as a coordinator, and gain some confidence in his game plans and continue to use them, we'll be well off.
 
Top