Bob's Blog: Football 301: Decoding Garrett - Wk 4

Pottsville Maroons

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
25
http://insidecorner.dmagazine.com/2009/10/06/football-301-decoding-garrett-week-4/#more-17273
Football 301: Decoding Garrett – Week 4

Posted on October 6th, 2009 9:42am by Bob Sturm
Filed under Dallas Cowboys, Sturm

DISCLAIMER: This is not for everyone. It may not be for you. This is a statistical study of the Cowboys offense with lots of numbers that may make your head tired if you are not up to it. Read it only if it is something that is of interest to you.

Before Denver put the brakes on this juggernaut of an offense, the results were difficult to comprehend. In the first 3 weeks of football, the Cowboys offense had the ball for 175 offensive snaps, and rolled up 1280 yards. That is an astounding 7.31 yards per snap. High School powers brag about 7.31 yards per snap. This doesn’t happen in the National Football League. Despite the feeling that the offense was failing, the reality is the yardage they rolled up was a fabulous sign.

But, when the Cowboys offense dropped to 4.37 a snap on Sunday, was it more of just a market correction or a down week?

They ran the ball 25 times for 74 yards. Less than 3 yards a carry. The idea that they should have run the ball more seems like a stretch. The fact is, they did not run with any effectiveness. And, they also did not have Marion Barber in the 2nd half for much of anything. We must realize that while Tashard Chocie is a nice story, it is folly to compare him to Marion Barber or even Felix Jones in scaring opponents. He is nice as a change-up, but in games where he is counted on to be “the man” the Cowboys offense doesn’t seem to operate the same way. Think about it; who was their main RB in December of last year? And how did that December offense look last year?
They passed the ball for 241 net, which is affected by 3 big plays. 2 were screens in the first half, and the last big play was the long shot to Sam Hurd. If you subtract those 3 (which you obviously cannot), the mediocre 5.12 yards per pass play falls to an amazingly ineffective 3.06 yards per pass on the other 44 snaps.

In Denver, we also saw another big issue with the offense. Pass Protection. And I cannot stress this enough; every bad issue the offense ever has is a result of poor pass protection. Jason Garrett’s play selection is effected by poor pass protection (he gets very careful, and keeps Witten in which is like trying to run your offense with 1 arm behind your back). Tony Romo’s throw selection is certainly effected by the rush in his face. All of the bad days for this offense all start when the Cowboys cannot build and maintain a pocket. The Giants playoff game. Arizona. Pittsburgh. Baltimore. Philadelphia.

Which, as we look at the Cowboys from the proper perspective we must ask the question of how do you gameplan against Jason Garrett? If your answer is not, “Blitz, Blitz, Blitz” until Romo/Garrett can prove they have an answer for it, then you have not been paying attention.

To put it another way, think of it like this: If I blitz the Cowboys, they will be likely to leave Witten and Barber (or Choice) in to pick up the blitz. Now, if those players are in on protection schemes, then who is in route? Roy Williams (Romo and Williams connect on just 44% of their attempts), Patrick Crayton (46%), and Miles Austin (41%). This season, on Romo throws to WRs, the Cowboys are a mere 31-70 (44%).

If I blitz Jason Garrett’s offense, I make the Cowboys throw to WRs. And for whatever reasons, the Cowboys WRs are not making teams pay through 4 games. Also, if I blitz, I beat up Tony Romo, and he doesn’t perform well when he is hit (in fairness to Romo, almost no QBs do – how many times did Favre get hit on Monday night? 0 sacks).

Let’s look at the Cowboys use of Personnel in their 72 offensive snaps:
Totals by Personnel Groups:
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-personnel4.gif


[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]
Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here .

As you can see, nothing was very effective. Of 39 plays from “under center”, they rolled up just 163 yards. Also, the 2 screen passes were part of that total, meaning, of the other 37 plays, the Cowboys could barely budge the ball – 110 yards (2.97 yards per snap).

Video Breakdowns:
Here, I want to look at 5 plays this week. I have simplified the video (with Brian’s help, of course) to just strip each one down to one play per video. I want to examine the 2 screen plays, the blitz that turned the game for Denver, and the last 2 shots into the endzone. Some good, and some bad.

Thanks, Brian at DC Fanatic.com who provides the videos (and the biting commentary) for this exercise. And Shawn for his work in compiling numbers.
—————————————————–
The Play: 1/20/21 – “13″ personnel – Screen to Barber for 26 yards

[youtube]o8UVguxgHb0[/youtube]
*
What Happened:This is a very straight-forward screen that is a wonderful remedy for an amped up defense. Use their aggressiveness against them. The Broncos have the Cowboys in a 1st and 20 hole, and now will rush 5 to make the Cowboys sweat. The Cowboys counter with a screen to Barber out of “13″, in which John Phillips is in a pass route and Martellus in in pass protect off RT. Watch the fine work of the interior line, with Kosier showing very impressive mobility to go get in a DB’s way. Andre Gurode is also demonstrating his ability to get down field with a full sprint looking for someone to hit. For a second, it doesn’t look like Barber can go faster than Gurode! I don’t think we often consider mobility a key attribute of the Cowboys’ OL, but here we see #63 and #65 can do some damage in screens to the left.
————————————————————
The Play: 1Q – 1/10/39 – “22″ Personnel – Screen to Choice for 27 yards

[youtube]XM8xDpUTlao[/youtube]

What Happened: This play is interesting in we see how defense react to what they see in the pre snap. Just like the next play below (when Hill blitzes BECAUSE Choice went in motion) we see here that the Broncos notice that the Cowboys have “22″ personnel. This is their most impressive power offense, with Bennett and Witten run blocking, Deon Anderson leading for Choice. When the Cowboys load everyone up to the right by putting Bennett in motion, they are either running right or trying to convince the Broncos they are running right. The Broncos then run blitz #24 Bailey from that side, and he likely would have had a chance to blow that play up if it was a run right.

Instead, the Cowboys have a screen set up, that is timed pretty well. Kosier, Gurode, and Davis all get downfield, and notice again Kosier’s great job getting out and sealing the OLB to the sideline. Choice beats one Denver DL #90 Peterson to the corner. When he does, it is a big gainer.
—————————————————————–
The Play: 2Q – 3/14/21 – “S12″ – Blitz and Fumble


[youtube]REmE1kZtkUQ[/youtube]



What Happened: Here is what I wrote yesterday about this 3rd and long out of “S12″:
The play came with 10:19 to go in the 2nd Quarter, the Cowboys up 10-0, and facing a 3rd and 14; they decide that they will go shotgun, but with 2 Tight Ends lined up tight, and 2 WRs. Tashard Choice starts next to Romo, but motions to the left sideline to reveal whether the Broncos are in zone or man. What does that mean? That means nobody is back with Romo in the shotgun to pick up a blitz.​
Denver studies this all week, and like many of us have discussed, when a team goes shotgun-empty, they decided that that will mean a blindside blitz from SS, Renaldo Hill. Yes, the Cowboys know the defense against the blitz, but they will only have a split second to get the ball out. Hill times his run brilliantly, and Romo is waiting for Roy Williams to get his route 14 yards down the field so they can move the chains. At the split second Roy is reaching the 1st down marker, Hill unloads on Romo’s blindside. Choice, who would have been right where Hill was blitzing, stands at the left sideline doing nothing but occupying Andre Goodman. Romo is sacked and fumbles. Denver returns it for an eventual 7 points (1 play later).​
This is a sack that had nothing to do with anyone on the field. Every one of the 11 players on the field for the Cowboys is doing what their job asked on that play. But, the coaches of the Cowboys were out-smarted by the new coaches of the Denver Broncos. The game was never the same. From that point on, the Broncos realized the Cowboys don’t handle the blitzes and pressure well, and the Cowboys couldn’t do anything about it.​
That is what I wrote yesterday. I think I got most of it right, but I would like to take issue with myself with another 24 hours to talk to others and review this play yet again. I think Romo deserves some blame here for A) locking into Roy and B) not seeing the field. If you are playing QB, you cannot lock onto one half of the field. We will see this again later on the final 2 plays of the game. He doesn’t even consider that there are options on the left. He just knows on this play that Williams is running to the marker, so he doesn’t look elsewhere, despite the Broncos having 3 DBs to that side of the field to defend 2 WRs. The numbers are not right for Tony.

Watch the play again. See Martellus Bennett off Left Tackle? See that he sees the blitz and looks like he might be trying to tell Romo in the pre snap (0:27 of video)? Regardless, Bennett breaks off his route as you should off a blitz, and if Romo throws to him, they do not get 14 yards – but they do at least get some more room before they punt. And they don’t surrender a sack.
This is called QB awareness. If Romo is aware of both sides of the field, then he can “take what he is given”. But, if he has tunnel vision as is determined to throw to Roy from the second he breaks the huddle, then he doesn’t see Hill blitzing or Bennett reacting to Hill’s blitz.

Blame Garrett for a poor concept to go “empty” out of the shotgun, but blame Romo for not seeing the play.
——————————————
The Play:4Q – 3/G/3 – “S11″ – Incomplete to Hurd


[youtube]mWZuFmnZNQw[/youtube]



What Happened:These last two plays got plenty of my description yesterday, too:
Consider the final 2 plays of the game yesterday: 2 plays from the 3 yard line. No timeouts are left. So, you must throw into the endzone. Roy Williams and Marion Barber are not in the game, because neither is healthy enough to continue. So, as Offensive Coordinator, I must consider my options. The Cowboys are going to use “S11″, so I have Witten next to Colombo, Choice on Romo’s right side, Austin wide left, Crayton slot left, and Hurd split right. Denver is going to match-up man-to-man on the receivers, and blitz one more than you can protect. The Cowboys then make the incredible decision to keep Witten in to protect. If you read me regularly, you know there is nothing that makes me crazier that Jason Garrett does than to keep Witten in on a crucial play. We have gone on and on about how he is your #1 target, and he is your money receiver. But, like the final play of the NY Giants playoff game,Garrett leaves Witten in protection on 3rd and 4th down here. This is inexcusable, especially considering that Roy and MB3 are not in the game. What this means is with the game on the line, you have Romo trying to find 2 undrafted WRs (Austin and Hurd) and a 7th round WR (Crayton), who have made fewer big catches in all of their careers combined than Witten makes every few weeks. If you need an extra Tight End to pass protect, then get Martellus out there, and take out a WR for Witten in the slot. This should not be this complicated.​
Then, Romo, who also deserves plenty of blame, decides to try to isolate Hurd against Champ Bailey for 2 consecutive slants in the endzone. Why he never looks to Miles Austin who is A) open, and B) working against Andre Goodman is beyond me. The throws weren’t bad, but Bailey recovered nicely. Since a slant is basically a physical battle to win the football, the question would be, “How many battles has Hurd in his career won that gave Romo such belief in him in that situation?” This isn’t Owens or Irvin out there. It is Sam Hurd!​
My addition to those comments are simply this – in reviewing the game film, it appears that by this portion of the game that Romo has decided he has had enough of Miles Austin. Austin’s poor route in the 3Q cost the Cowboys the football (even Champ Bailey knew that play was for an “out” route), and then his failure to recognize a blitz in the early 4th Quarter cost the Cowboys another punt. Romo has decided that since Austin has not made a play, and Hurd just did, that he is going to Hurd. No matter what. Again, my QB cannot have his mind made up before the play. And if he does, I pray that he doesn’t convince himself to challenge one of the very best CBs in football with his 4th WR.
——————————————
The Play:4Q – 4/G/3 – “S11″ – Incomplete to Hurd, again.

[youtube]WPfomHv0teM[/youtube]

What Happened:I should probably just write “see above” here. The last play and this one are very similar. The only difference is that Crayton runs a slant instead of the out. Otherwise, Austin slants from the left, Hurd from the right. Man to Man coverage. Everything is identical. It makes you wonder why the coaches aren’t in Romo’s ear between plays saying “Watch the left” if they saw what we saw on 3rd down.

This also reminds you of the stubborness to run virtually the exact same play two snaps in a row at the goal-line (Carolina’s back-to-back fades).
No Witten again. You know, if I am going to lose a game because I threw it to Witten and it didn’t work, well then I just have to take my medicine. But, do I really have to accept that this QB/OC dynamic duo want to put the game in Sam Hurd’s hands? A guy who is only on the field because Roy Williams cannot get out there?

To say I am perplexed at the decision making of the QB/OC tandem is an understatement.
——————————————
Target Distribution:

Targets – Week 4 vs Den
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-targets4.gif


[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]

Season Target Distribution To Date:
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-targets4a.gif


[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]

3rd Down Target Distribution:
As you will see, 3rd downs are a mess right now. Ugly.

3RD Down Targets – Week 4 – Den
[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-3rdtarget4.gif
Table Tutorial[/FONT]

3rd Down Targets – Season Totals
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-3rdtarget4a.gif


[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]

SACKS
The first week where sacks and pass protect were an absolute sabotage to the offense. Look for the Chiefs to study and learn from what the Broncos did.

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-sack4.gif

[FONT=verdana,arial,sans-serif]Table Tutorial[/FONT]
 

Pottsville Maroons

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
25
WG, if you guys know how to get those tables to load properly, please fix the post. I've tried once to fix it, with no success....same with the videos.
 

BotchedLobotomy

Wide Right
Messages
15,505
Reaction score
23,596
OK. So we have a guy here that obviously knows football beyond your average Joe fan. We have alot of your average Joe fans saying most of the same things throughout this forum. Yet, the coaches and players on this team don't seem to see it?

:rolleyes:
 

LucaBrasi

Sleeps with the fishes
Messages
5,589
Reaction score
7,495
Miles Austin was open on both plays but Tunnel Vision Tony never even looked that way.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
The 3rd and 14 was mind numbing. Its an obvious deep drop passing down, and Ginger sends Choice in motion from the backfield to do nothing in particular instead of staying in to pass protect.
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
parcells316;2996243 said:
Miles Austin was open on both plays but Tunnel Vision Tony never even looked that way.

Denver baited Garret into those horrid back-to-back play calls knowing full well that Jason Wittem would stay into block, thus making Sam Hurd the hot read, and that Romo would go to that read. Their defense clearly did not worry about Austin, and don't think for a moment that wasn't by design. They set themselves up to force and defemndt the middle pass because they knew that's where Garrett and Romo would go with the ball.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,630
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Pottsville Maroons;2996215 said:
WG, if you guys know how to get those tables to load properly, please fix the post. I've tried once to fix it, with no success....same with the videos.
Post fixed.

1) Tables - Zone doesn't like tables. Those are screen captures that I simply add to my photobucket acct.

2) Videos - See How to Embed Youtube Videos on the Zone
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,097
Reaction score
11,410
AMERICAS_FAN;2996267 said:
Denver baited Garret into those horrid back-to-back play calls knowing full well that Jason Wittem would stay into block, thus making Sam Hurd the hot read, and that Romo would go to that read. Their defense clearly did not worry about Austin, and don't think for a moment that wasn't by design. They set themselves up to force and defemndt the middle pass because they knew that's where Garrett and Romo would go with the ball.

I'm afraid you are right. I think this is along the lines of what Ed Reed meant about our offense being predictable last year... Not that they knew we liked to throw to Witten or run behind Leonard Davis, but that when they changed their defense they knew what we would check into.

It's kind of like how the Skins got us to throw so many times in the game we lost to them last year. By calling certain sets on defense, they could essentially force us to run what they wanted us to run.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
Chocolate Lab;2996288 said:
I'm afraid you are right. I think this is along the lines of what Ed Reed meant about our offense being predictable last year... Not that they knew we liked to throw to Witten or run behind Leonard Davis, but that when they changed their defense they knew what we would check into.

It's kind of like how the Skins got us to throw so many times in the game we lost to them last year. By calling certain sets on defense, they could essentially force us to run what they wanted us to run.

I was thinking the same thing. Not even Garret is dumb enough to walk into the stadium with a plan to throw at Champ Bailey 13 out of 15 times on purpose. He got out coached.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,200
Keep in mind Garrett has done a good job the 1st 3 weeks.

But he deserves criticism this week because Mike Nolan just outcoached him bigtime.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
CATCH17;2996361 said:
Keep in mind Garrett has done a good job the 1st 3 weeks.

But he deserves criticism this week because Mike Nolan just outcoached him bigtime.

Not really, rolling up huge points on the Bucs isnt impressive, he got away from the ground game 2nd half against the Giants, and we had the back to back fade pass fiasco and 14 offensive points scored against mighty Carolina.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,200
Cochese;2996382 said:
Not really, rolling up huge points on the Bucs isnt impressive, he got away from the ground game 2nd half against the Giants, and we had the back to back fade pass fiasco and 14 offensive points scored against mighty Carolina.

Garrett put us in a position to win against the Giants.

I do agree about the fade pass fiasco but even so he didn't call a terrible game against the Panthers.

Im not going to let 2 play calls against the Panthers and Tony Romo making amateur decisions cloud all the good he did do in those games.


But against the Broncos you can have at him. He deserves heat for that game.


The players HAVE to be accountable for some of their mistakes but fans always want to blame the coaches. Even when the coaches put them in a position for success.
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
Interesting analysis.

On the fumble by Tony I would on second thought put some responsibility on him. Denver is blitzing. He has to drop it to Bennett or Choice, who is by the sideline all alone. It probably does not pick up a first down unless there is a missed tackle but it give you a chance on 3 and 14 when there is a blitz.

On the goalline plays, the first one was a poor throw by Romo. The second was a good throw by Romo great play by Bailey. I don't hate the play calls as Romo is not a good fade thrower. People can complain about the same play call, but Denver did the exact same defense and on both plays Romo had time, so that isn't it. I don't like Witten staying in. If either Choice or Witten can fake like they are blocking and get to the flat either one has a walk in touchdown.

As far as Romo not looking to the left, the Bronocos are rushing 8. He has no time to be looking around. He has to decide presnap if he is going left or right. Obviously he felt comfortable with Hurd there. Champ made a great play on 4th down. One could argue interference but I don't blame the no call.

Overall, on offense I think we need to simplify more, not try to do so many personnel groups, just focus on what we do well. Draws and counters running the football, and intermediate passing. The Defensive gameplan against us will be to stack the line stop Witten in the passing game and single cover the wide receivers IMO.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
CATCH17;2996361 said:
Keep in mind Garrett has done a good job the 1st 3 weeks.
.

He's done a good job because we had Felix Jones the first three weeks. Garrett has been making these same mistakes for two years. Good D coordinators are able to predict what he's doing, just like Ed Reed said, and thus force the Cowboys into doing what they want them to do.

Just like all the posters on here typically are able to predict what Garrett is going to run when he puts a particular player in motion, comes out with a certain formation, or has the QB yell an audible at the line. Good teams know his tricks now and are capable of completely abusing the offense as a result.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
As I noted the other day, Garrett is too green to be a OC, and far too young to be a HC.

He needs to be tutored by a real head coach. Wade doesn't pass as a real head coach.
 

Pottsville Maroons

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
25
WoodysGirl;2996283 said:
Post fixed.

1) Tables - Zone doesn't like tables. Those are screen captures that I simply add to my photobucket acct.

2) Videos - See How to Embed Youtube Videos on the Zone

Thank you very much. The work you guys and everyone on this board do to provide content like this is appreciated even more after guys like me make one failed attempt after another to get stuff like that to paste correctly.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
Gaede;2996412 said:
Just like all the posters on here typically are able to predict what Garrett is going to run when he puts a particular player in motion, comes out with a certain formation, or has the QB yell an audible at the line. Good teams know his tricks now and are capable of completely abusing the offense as a result.

The first INT against the Giants comes to mind. It was like Tony shouted out what the play was going to be to Pierce.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Clearly Romo is off mentally and is playing scared.

I honestly think the stress and pressure is starting to get to him a bit. Hopefully after the Chiefs game he can step back and take a look at things and improve his play.

Locking on? Not seeing blitzers? Predetermined routes? That all sounds like he is simply nervous out there trying too hard not to make a mistake.

I just want him to have a nice weak where he can lite up the Chiefs, step back and relax a little bit, and just play football. When they do that, they can play some pretty good ball, but Romo is playing scared right now.
 

Dodger

Indomitable
Messages
4,216
Reaction score
43
Consider the final 2 plays of the game yesterday: 2 plays from the 3 yard line. No timeouts are left. So, you must throw into the endzone. Roy Williams and Marion Barber are not in the game, because neither is healthy enough to continue. So, as Offensive Coordinator, I must consider my options. The Cowboys are going to use “S11″, so I have Witten next to Colombo, Choice on Romo’s right side, Austin wide left, Crayton slot left, and Hurd split right. Denver is going to match-up man-to-man on the receivers, and blitz one more than you can protect. The Cowboys then make the incredible decision to keep Witten in to protect. If you read me regularly, you know there is nothing that makes me crazier that Jason Garrett does than to keep Witten in on a crucial play. We have gone on and on about how he is your #1 target, and he is your money receiver. But, like the final play of the NY Giants playoff game,Garrett leaves Witten in protection on 3rd and 4th down here. This is inexcusable, especially considering that Roy and MB3 are not in the game. What this means is with the game on the line, you have Romo trying to find 2 undrafted WRs (Austin and Hurd) and a 7th round WR (Crayton), who have made fewer big catches in all of their careers combined than Witten makes every few weeks. If you need an extra Tight End to pass protect, then get Martellus out there, and take out a WR for Witten in the slot. This should not be this complicated.

Then, Romo, who also deserves plenty of blame, decides to try to isolate Hurd against Champ Bailey for 2 consecutive slants in the endzone. Why he never looks to Miles Austin who is A) open, and B) working against Andre Goodman is beyond me. The throws weren’t bad, but Bailey recovered nicely. Since a slant is basically a physical battle to win the football, the question would be, “How many battles has Hurd in his career won that gave Romo such belief in him in that situation?” This isn’t Owens or Irvin out there. It is Sam Hurd!
Yeah...about this...it's pretty much why I posted yesterday, and why others are saying it as well, that the play-calling is suspect. I know some here don't want to believe this, and neither did I to be honest, but when this stuff is right there in front of you to see, opinions such as these start to gain credibility and become much more difficult to simply dismiss.
 
Top