BP says that Sean Taylor cost the skins the game... maybe... LOL

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
YoMick said:
that was pretty funny....

:laugh2:


BP said he was watching as a fan.....:laugh2:

I'll bet he's glad ST is NOT on his team!;)
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
a lot of things cost us the game. inability to score in the redzone, Def. could not stop them on 3rd down, bad play from our corners, and no clutch play by John Hall. Sean taylor def. didnt help with that face mask penatly(first personal foul was BS).
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
apickmans said:
Sean taylor def. didnt help with that face mask penatly(first personal foul was BS).

Helmet-to-helmet contact on a defenseless receiver always gets called.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
apickmans said:
a lot of things cost us the game. inability to score in the redzone, Def. could not stop them on 3rd down, bad play from our corners, and no clutch play by John Hall. Sean taylor def. didnt help with that face mask penatly(first personal foul was BS).

Nah.... not really... its the bonehead plays that occur when the result of the game is hanging in the balance.... everything before has already happened and cannot be changed.... your future actions are in your control...
 

riggo

Benched
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
AdamJT13 said:
Helmet-to-helmet contact on a defenseless receiver always gets called.

could be wrong- i was pretty hyped/drunk- but i didnt think it was a question of helmet to helmet contact.
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
AdamJT13 said:
Helmet-to-helmet contact on a defenseless receiver always gets called.

except it wasnt helmet to helmet on a defenseless receiver. Taylor lowered and used his shoulder.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
riggo said:
could be wrong- i was pretty hyped/drunk- but i didnt think it was a question of helmet to helmet contact.

He hit him with his shoulder. However, you're not supposed to hit a WR when he's up in the air and IIRC, that's what Taylor did. Then again, I can never interpret that rule correctly since the refs seem to change their mind every two secondS on what is a "launch" and what is not a "launch."

Even still, that wasn't really anything different from what Roy usually does (hitting with his shoulder) and Commanders fans go ape over it every time. But when Taylor does it, it's b.s.


YAKUZA
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
YoMick said:
Nah.... not really... its the bonehead plays that occur when the result of the game is hanging in the balance.... everything before has already happened and cannot be changed.... your future actions are in your control...

okay then i blame john hall for us losing the game since sean taylors penalties happened before it and could not be changed.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
apickmans said:
except it wasnt helmet to helmet on a defenseless receiver. Taylor lowered and used his shoulder.

The top of Taylor's helmet hit Robinson's facemask/side of helmet. That's clear as day on the replay from the front.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,313
Reaction score
19,713
I blame the Iraq war on parcells. we all know rumsfeld and bush are big Commanders fans and after the tough loss they had three years ago and the bad penalty calls, they just had to get the anger out of their system.

I mean if you are reaching to blame BP for something, then lets just go all the way
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
Yakuza Rich said:
He hit him with his shoulder. However, you're not supposed to hit a WR when he's up in the air and IIRC, that's what Taylor did. Then again, I can never interpret that rule correctly since the refs seem to change their mind every two secondS on what is a "launch" and what is not a "launch."

Even still, that wasn't really anything different from what Roy usually does (hitting with his shoulder) and Commanders fans go ape over it every time. But when Taylor does it, it's b.s.


YAKUZA

Rich, didnt the ball hit the receiver in the hand or his finger tips? If so Taylor has the right to try to dislodge the receiver from the ball right? Ive seen the replay a couple times and thats what i can remember.

Your right Roy does do it as much as Taylor does, except Roy never gets flagged for it (of course except this past sunday) and thats why its BS.
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
AdamJT13 said:
The top of Taylor's helmet hit Robinson's facemask/side of helmet. That's clear as day on the replay from the front.

heh i guess we're just gonna have to disagree. :rolleyes:
 

riggo

Benched
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
AdamJT13 said:
The top of Taylor's helmet hit Robinson's facemask/side of helmet. That's clear as day on the replay from the front.

ive been looking for a video- do you have a link?

i thought the call was the old defenseless receiver thingy. i also thought the ball was tipped and still in play, in which case taylor can hit him, so long as its not helmet to helmet/spearing. but, again, i could be wrong. i cant keep up with the latest rules and interpretations.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
AdamJT13 said:
The top of Taylor's helmet hit Robinson's facemask/side of helmet. That's clear as day on the replay from the front.

I just got off of Tivo, and you are exactely right! Thugs helmet hit the right side of Robinson's helmet...

This is just another excuse for the dirty play of a dirty player, period. And, if you notice, the Thug did not really dispute the call, or argue anything about it...because he knew what he did.
 

NeonNinja

Dash28
Messages
17,294
Reaction score
15,038
Stop complaining about that to us, we see our fair share of questionable calls on Roy.
 

riggo

Benched
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
apickmans said:
Your right Roy does do it as much as Taylor does, except Roy never gets flagged for it (of course except this past sunday) and thats why its BS.

i think roy was called for spearing or leading with the helmet or whatever that is. he put his head down and arms up and hit him in the chest.
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
5Stars said:
I just got off of Tivo, and you are exactely right! Thugs helmet the right side of Robinson's helmet...

This is just another excuse for the dirty play of a dirty player, period. And, if you notice, the Thug did not really dispute the call, or argue anything about it...because he knew what he did.

hey 5stars i think you forgot your dog again.
 

riggo

Benched
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
5Stars said:
I just got off of Tivo, and you are exactely right! Thugs helmet the right side of Robinson's helmet...

This is just another excuse for the dirty play of a dirty player, period. And, if you notice, the Thug did not really dispute the call, or argue anything about it...because he knew what he did.

if thats the case, then i have no problem with the call.
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
riggo said:
i think roy was called for spearing or leading with the helmet or whatever that is. he put his head down and arms up and hit him in the chest.

yeah against Jax, i mentioned that.
 
Top