Breaking down the interceptions

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
What was Romo's problem last night. In a nutshell, I would say he was way too confident throwing the ball into spots it should never go. Romo sees the field well and sees things quickly, but he was trying to do too much, too quickly.

1st Interception. 4-man rush by the Bills. Overthrow of Witten. Maybe there was some kind of mix-up, but it looked to me like it was still thrown awfully far. Just an overthrow. Pressure was not a factor. And it wasn't a bad read as Witten was open.

2nd Interception. 4-man rush by the Bills. LB jumps route in front of Witten. It was a nice play by the LB. Romo locked onto Witten and just threw it without knowing if he was open. Bad read, but as much as anything a great play by the LB.

3rd Interception. Bills rush four. The volley ball interception. Inexplicably Romo drifts to his right as there is no pressure and he has lots of room to step up. He was just careless here when he didn't have a lane to throw into. This one was a real killer. A great play by the DE.

4th Interception. Bills rush four. Bad read. He just throws into coverage trying to get it to Hurd. He just forced a pass totally unnecessarily.

5th Interception. Bills rush four. To Witten at the goalline. Threw right into coverage. Bad read. It looked like Romo just made up his mind he was going to cram it into Witten. ON 2nd DOWN. Terrible decision.

My thoughts overall. First of all I'm a big Romo fan and think he can be great. His lack of game experience sometimes shows up though. He gets careless or thinks he's bulletproof. Sometimes it seemed, like on the last one Romo just made up his mind that he was going to throw it into the teeth of the coverage. This game should be a wake-up call. Also, our poor start really put us in the position of trying to claw back in.

Romo has a tendency when we are down to start flinging the ball around and not take what the defense gives you. He did this last year against New Orleans and Philly late in the year and threw a couple of awful interceptions. He's got to do a better job of managing the game especially when we're behind. He has to realize that he doesn't have to do it all himself. He has to let his guys make some plays.

To another point. I don't think teams to that well blitzing Romo. He's got a quick release and is able to make quick decisions. What I think we'll see teams do is drop off and play coverage while trying to keep Romo in the pocket. (I'm guessing this is what New England will do for the most part). Pressure was really not a factor on the interceptions. The only one it was a factor, Romo basically created it by drifting to his right.

Romo has to be able to dump off to the shorter routes and let guys make plays (instead of doing it all himself) and he has to be willing to occasionally tuck it under and run if teams are going to play that way, because there are times when they will cover everyone and you just have to take what the defense gives you. If we don't have it already, we should have a QB draw play for Witten to keep the defenses honest.
 

THEHEREAFTER

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,862
Reaction score
6,301
The 4th and 5th to me were the real killers. I'm so accustomed to Romo making great decisions that I couldn't believe what he was doing. If you watch the 5th one.... T.O. was open short middle and MBIII or JJ was WIDE OPEN in the left flat. If he sees that we may have scored. Witten wasn't close to being open.
 

Dcowboy84

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
169
i agree completely with your assessment of the INTs last night.

it was the fact that he was so zeroed in on Witten all night that was bothering me, and it caused that 5th pick especially.

i also agree about your noticing that pressure wasn't really a factor on the picks, but instead bad reads and good coverage.

this is where i was really disappointed in our running game.

if teams are going to drop into coverage to counter Romo's escapability and ability to make plays against the blitz, and keep rushing 4, then our backs need to be able to exploit this and gain 6-8 yards.

unfortunately, last night i did not see the same fire from our running game that we had the first four games. i know, i know, there's a lot of criticism on Julius anyway, but even Marion did not seem to be as fired up as we've seen before, with the exception of the catch for a 1st down before the Crayton TD

bottomline, our running game needs to step up big time if teams are going to put more people in coverage and less blitzing
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
Dcowboy84;1696844 said:
i agree completely with your assessment of the INTs last night.

it was the fact that he was so zeroed in on Witten all night that was bothering me, and it caused that 5th pick especially.

i also agree about your noticing that pressure wasn't really a factor on the picks, but instead bad reads and good coverage.

this is where i was really disappointed in our running game.

if teams are going to drop into coverage to counter Romo's escapability and ability to make plays against the blitz, and keep rushing 4, then our backs need to be able to exploit this and gain 6-8 yards.

unfortunately, last night i did not see the same fire from our running game that we had the first four games. i know, i know, there's a lot of criticism on Julius anyway, but even Marion did not seem to be as fired up as we've seen before, with the exception of the catch for a 1st down before the Crayton TD

bottomline, our running game needs to step up big time if teams are going to put more people in coverage and less blitzing


That's a very good point about the running game. Our running game was not good last night, especially on 1st down. A good running game would have made things look a lot different.

I also think if we can't run, at least we need to do some dump-offs to Julius and Barber. Romo needs to let other guys make plays sometimes, so he doesn't have to do it all himself.
 

DC_Addict

New Member
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
Romo's the type of guy that will learn alot from this game. His coaches will drill those mistakes into his head until he learns what to do and what not to do in those situations. He'll be fine and won't throw for 5 Int's ever again.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
It was pretty simple I thought. He never got comfortable and he was too hyper and tried to force things. Just not a good night for him but I'm not too concerned by it.
 

Doctor32

Hi-Definition Warrior
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
2
Nice analysis.
I think this was game that demonstrated how fine the "line" is between good NFL QB play and poor NFL QB play.
What is troubling, was the fact that the INTs came against base coverages or combo coverages out of a Tampa 2 look. That explains the deep drops by LBs running underneath routes.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
20 rushing attempts
50 passing attempts


That has to stop.

Sometime you have to stick with the running game and it will eventually pay off... he was throwing WAY too much last night.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
Don't take too much away from Buffalo's defense, they played great last night and did an excellent job of reading the plays.

Their D-Line got pressure with a 4-man rush while their LBs were reading run or pass very well. A number of times, Tony would drop back to pass and you could see the LBs moving quickly to cover the passing lanes. Other times they were reading run and would come up to stop it. Very active and quick to make the reads.

Their secondary also did a great job of staying with our WRs. This is where we really missed Terry Glenn as Crayton doesn't have anywhere near his speed. Their DBs were playing tight coverage and staying with our guys and were pretty physical.

Our O-Line struggled to contain their passrush and both Adams and Columbo were bull rushed at times, which isn't good.

I believe Romo made a lot of bad reads and bad throws but a good amount of the credit needs to go to the Bills' defense too. How they played that well against us when they have completely sucked in the other games is beyond me. They were fired up and highly motivated. They shut down our running game and forced us to pass almost exclusively once we got behind.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
THUMPER;1697392 said:
Don't take too much away from Buffalo's defense, they played great last night and did an excellent job of reading the plays.

Their D-Line got pressure with a 4-man rush while their LBs were reading run or pass very well. A number of times, Tony would drop back to pass and you could see the LBs moving quickly to cover the passing lanes. Other times they were reading run and would come up to stop it. Very active and quick to make the reads.

Their secondary also did a great job of staying with our WRs. This is where we really missed Terry Glenn as Crayton doesn't have anywhere near his speed. Their DBs were playing tight coverage and staying with our guys and were pretty physical.

Our O-Line struggled to contain their passrush and both Adams and Columbo were bull rushed at times, which isn't good.

I believe Romo made a lot of bad reads and bad throws but a good amount of the credit needs to go to the Bills' defense too. How they played that well against us when they have completely sucked in the other games is beyond me. They were fired up and highly motivated. They shut down our running game and forced us to pass almost exclusively once we got behind.


I think part of the issue was the energy level of the Bills defense was 10 times higher than the offense. The oline did not maul people like they have been it looked like they showed up expecting to win
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
dboyz;1696800 said:
What was Romo's problem last night. In a nutshell, I would say he was way too confident throwing the ball into spots it should never go. Romo sees the field well and sees things quickly, but he was trying to do too much, too quickly.

1st Interception. 4-man rush by the Bills. Overthrow of Witten. Maybe there was some kind of mix-up, but it looked to me like it was still thrown awfully far. Just an overthrow. Pressure was not a factor. And it wasn't a bad read as Witten was open.

we run a timing-based offense, meaning most, if not all, of Romo's throws goes to a spot on the field where the receiver is supposed to run his route to, the "overthrow" was a result of Romo expecting Witten to continue running deep down the seam, instead of cutting it off short, which he did

overall, I agree w/ your take, but the 1st INT was a miscommunication
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
THUMPER;1697392 said:
Don't take too much away from Buffalo's defense, they played great last night and did an excellent job of reading the plays.

Their D-Line got pressure with a 4-man rush while their LBs were reading run or pass very well. A number of times, Tony would drop back to pass and you could see the LBs moving quickly to cover the passing lanes. Other times they were reading run and would come up to stop it. Very active and quick to make the reads.

Their secondary also did a great job of staying with our WRs. This is where we really missed Terry Glenn as Crayton doesn't have anywhere near his speed. Their DBs were playing tight coverage and staying with our guys and were pretty physical.

Our O-Line struggled to contain their passrush and both Adams and Columbo were bull rushed at times, which isn't good.

I believe Romo made a lot of bad reads and bad throws but a good amount of the credit needs to go to the Bills' defense too. How they played that well against us when they have completely sucked in the other games is beyond me. They were fired up and highly motivated. They shut down our running game and forced us to pass almost exclusively once we got behind.

ROmo wasn't in under as much durress as you make it seem, he had alot of time to throw on alot of passes

the line was pretty good last night pass-protecting

I would take that "pressure" any day of the week
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
THUMPER;1697392 said:
Don't take too much away from Buffalo's defense, they played great last night and did an excellent job of reading the plays.

Their D-Line got pressure with a 4-man rush while their LBs were reading run or pass very well. A number of times, Tony would drop back to pass and you could see the LBs moving quickly to cover the passing lanes. Other times they were reading run and would come up to stop it. Very active and quick to make the reads.

Their secondary also did a great job of staying with our WRs. This is where we really missed Terry Glenn as Crayton doesn't have anywhere near his speed. Their DBs were playing tight coverage and staying with our guys and were pretty physical.

Our O-Line struggled to contain their passrush and both Adams and Columbo were bull rushed at times, which isn't good.

I believe Romo made a lot of bad reads and bad throws but a good amount of the credit needs to go to the Bills' defense too. How they played that well against us when they have completely sucked in the other games is beyond me. They were fired up and highly motivated. They shut down our running game and forced us to pass almost exclusively once we got behind.

I agree you have to give the Bills some credit. Specifically the 2nd and 3rd interceptions were good plays. The 4th was a pretty good play as well. At times the Bills got some pressure, but on the interception plays, the pocket was pretty much clean.
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
Bob Sacamano;1697549 said:
we run a timing-based offense, meaning most, if not all, of Romo's throws goes to a spot on the field where the receiver is supposed to run his route to, the "overthrow" was a result of Romo expecting Witten to continue running deep down the seam, instead of cutting it off short, which he did

overall, I agree w/ your take, but the 1st INT was a miscommunication

You may well be right. I watched it through a few times and to me it still looked like an overthrow, but it is almost impossible tell unless there is another angle they show the play from.
 

thekavorka

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,787
Reaction score
34
Against the Pats, Romo needs to take what the defense gives him. If that means checkdowns to Barber/Julius then so be it. Let the RBs do their thing in the open field.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
thekavorka;1697577 said:
Against the Pats, Romo needs to take what the defense gives him. If that means checkdowns to Barber/Julius then so be it. Let the RBs do their thing in the open field.

For the most part this season Tony has taken what the defense gave him. Last night in the national spotlight evidently Tony tried to do more than he should have but I don't expect this will be a major problem down the line.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
If teams are going to drop into coverage like that and take away the Witten middle and the crossing routes and deep stuff, you need to throw to Anderson/Barber/Jones all day long.

Don't think you have to go deep just because that's what you do. If a team really wants to take it away, they can.

On the drives where Romo moved the ball to get us in position, Romo checked down constantly, and that allowed us to move down the field. I'm wrong in thinking that any runner can get the job done, now i'm thinking that doing what ever is neccessary to get a star runner in here is an EXTREME NEED!
 
Top