DarkVader33
Active Member
- Messages
- 303
- Reaction score
- 192
I hope you meant pos.You're going to get whatever poc player Jerry decides to get, and you low-IQ cowards will love it.

I hope you meant pos.You're going to get whatever poc player Jerry decides to get, and you low-IQ cowards will love it.

I still say no thanks to Crosby. As I said, he is primarily a 4–3 end and has played that role for most of his career. We are trying to get younger, spend less, and acquire more draft picks—not put all our eggs in one basket.He can put two-hands on the ground just as well as three. He can play in any scheme. Vegas is moving to the 3-4 as well. This ‘he is strictly a 4-3 DE’ is nonsense.
He's a typical 4-3 end. Not a Fangio type of 3-4 edge rusher.Crosby fits every scheme
Not for a player of his caliber.T
Thanks, that's an expensive contract.
Maybe give up our 20th pick?
Why wouldn’t you give even a first round pick for a sure fire player? He should have 3 good years left.
1. He is worth a first. Maybe not to us
- He would cost us a first-round pick (or more)
- He has primarily played as a 4–3 defensive end and may not fit a 3–4 scheme.
- He would command a hefty $30–35 million per year.
- This would be another Jerry Jones signing, not a Parker pick.
- We need linebackers, safeties and corners more than just one star player.
The problem is we aren't allowed to trade our remaining first rounder next year since the Q trade was 'the higher of the two' - so we don't know which one we still have. So a 2027 first rounder is out of the question. It would have to be #20 this year and probably more next year - leaving us with just one pick in the top 100 this year.Nope. Wouldn't do it. unless its a 2027 pick
If you can agree to trade the better of your two firsts why can’t you agree to trade the lesser of your two firsts?The problem is we aren't allowed to trade our remaining first rounder next year since the Q trade was 'the higher of the two' - so we don't know which one we still have. So a 2027 first rounder is out of the question. It would have to be #20 this year and probably more next year - leaving us with just one pick in the top 100 this year.
I have a buddy who works within the NFL. Just what he's heard.Really?
I had suggested that simply because they are contending, need an Edge in the first round and have low first round picks to trade.
I hadn’t actually seen it rumored. Do you remember where you saw it?
Ive seen an interesting proposal of 12 and Odighizuwa for Crosby and 36. Difference in pick value is roughly the 26th pick in the draft, and Raiders also get the starting player the want back as wellWell it goes without saying I’d rather have Crosby than guys like Taco. But in this draft? Would I rather have let’s say a Mansoor and Faulk over Crosby? I would. Especially if it means we spend money in free agency. This team is not gonna actively spend money on holes and trade for Crosby.
If you want to improve the defense then whey does it matter how they do it? We don’t need more All Pros we need football players.
I’d do that. I’d even throw in draft compensation if need be.Ive seen an interesting proposal of 12 and Odighizuwa for Crosby and 36. Difference in pick value is roughly the 26th pick in the draft, and Raiders also get the starting player the want back as well
If this trade happens, I think it might look something like this
I think its a solid proposal. They get a top 15 pick to go with Mendoza, as well as an above average 3T. We get an alpha rusher and still have two premium picks to add long term talentI’d do that. I’d even throw in draft compensation if need be.
What I suggested would go against what they've done over the last dozen years. I was assuming a change in philosophy, not expecting it. If they want to contend for a championship, they're going to have to change.I would too, but I just don't think the front office will do that based on its FA philosophy. It has shown that it is willing to make trades. I has not shown that it is willing to pay for top free agents.
Frankly, most of the best moves we've made the past few years have been trades. Ideally, the team would use trades, the draft, expensive free agency and cheap free agency, but we know there's one of those it does not use.
