HappyOnions
Datwin
- Messages
- 2,561
- Reaction score
- 2,089
He always seems to kill us,, so it would be nice to have him here at the right price.
Beasley's replacement?
I would love to see Humphries but I'm thinking Tate or Randall Cobb is a better fit.
How do?
We have Cooper and Gallup.
If Beasley walks who replaces him?
Are you really banking on Noah Brown or Cedric Wilson being a real factor?
Not sure what kind of money they want to spend on WR.
Chances are we will have TWills and Beasley's money available to a WR.
That might also take into account how they feel about Hurns.
I would say if they liked Tate at a Slot WR and they did not bring Twill and Beasley back and depending on how they feel about Hurns or Austin....I could see them possibly looking at spending on a decent 1-3 year deal for someone like a Tate.
That woudl give them Cooper, Gallup, Tate , Brown, Austin(if he is kept) and Wilson who was on IR plus any WR they might draft.
With that group, you'd be looking at having $30 million invested in your wide receiver corps. I don't see how the Cowboys or anyone else could afford that.
If you let Williams, Beasley go and you choose between Austin and Hurns to let go if not let both go.
I am not sure how much it would be.
One thing is clear however.
They are either going to stick with the run zeke run zeke pass to zeke and pass to the other guys offense...OR they are going to be more pass happy with Moore.
If they are going to be more pass happy with more and Dak...they better make sure they got guys that will instill confidence with Dak or he will not throw their way.
Tate would be that type of WR IMO....IF they let beasley go.
I think it comes down to if they can keep beasley cheaper than they can get a guy like tate. And it does not have to be Tate himself. Just a slot wr that has good hands that is dependable.
You think Cobb would be?They all have one thing in common, too expensive for this team.
You think Cobb would be?
Considering he's been paid a contract that averaged $10 million a year? Yes, I do. To say nothing of the fact that he's been an oft-injured disappointment since he signed it.
Funny that you should bring up Cobb, because I expected the Packers to cut him and sign Beasley to replace him.
Possible. I could see that move for him and hm. Cobb to me represents the aging/injured receiver sort of like Hurns last year that could be cheap.
Tate is a huge d-bag?