BTB Vela: Wedge Busted: New Rule Change Could Shape Dallas' Late-Draft Plans

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 1:00 PM CDT
comment.v1599.png
30 comments

Felix Jones' kickoff return skills were one of the most immediate payoffs from last year's stellar draft. Jones returned a kickoff 98 yards for a score against Philadelphia and just missed going the route on a couple more before hamstring and toe injuries shortened his season.

A new rules change threatens to diminish Jones' return explosiveness. The NFL this week banned the traditional four and five man wedges that are common on all levels of play. When executed properly, they work like this:
Two years ago, I watched former special teams coach Bruce DeHaven work with the Cowboys’ returners and watched him teach his guys to use cutbacks. Returners were instructed to initially run directly up the field, even if it was not behind the wedge. The intent is to pull coverage guys towards you and give your wedge blockers an angle. After running a few yards upfield, the game is to then cut behind your blockers.

Jones followed this technique perfectly. Dallas had a center return called. Jones fielded Akers kick on his two, about three yards inside the yard numbers on the far sideline.

The Cowboys wedge formed at the fifteen, just outside the far hash mark. The Cowboys use Tony Curtis, Joe Berger, Pat McQuistan and Deon Anderson as their center four. They join hands and then move forward together under control until they encounter the line of Eagles. The returner who doesn’t field the kick, Isaiah Stanback in this case, runs up and flanks Anderson, adding a fifth blocker to the wedge.

Jones was about five to seven yards wide and to the left of Curtis, the closest wedge member, when he fielded the ball. Instead of angling to his right and running immediately to get behind his five bodyguards, Jones ran straight upfield, to about the ten...

-- Felix Jones -- He's Crafty -- Like a Cat, BSR, 9-16-2008
The new rule allows nothing larger than two-man wedges. The NFL cited safety as its rationale -- the wedges are collision magnets, which invited wedge-busters on other teams to throw their bodies into the line and "blow it up."

The National Football Post's Matt Bowen, a wedge-buster in his day, argues the rule change will wipe out the big return and make kickoffs far less interesting. I'm not sure I agree with Bowen, but I do agree that big kickoff returns will diminish if teams continue to use the same four people they've assigned to wedge duty in the past.

star-divide.v5547.jpg

Dallas, as the quote demonstrates, used some combination of backup offensive linemen and fullbacks and blocking tight ends to form their four-man wedges. Berger and McQuistan formed the core of this group. Other teams have used defensive linemen; anybody who can produce the biggest bang against the wedge busters, who are usually linebackers, safeties and cornerbacks.

Two man wedges will place a premium on guys who can block in space, who can mirror a lighter, faster target and engage him one-on-one, or two-on-one in open field. The old wedges didn't require this of the linemen since coverage guys had to engage them. If you tried running around a wedge, the return man could simply hide behind it and follow the big grunts far upfield.

My guess is we may see fewer, if any offensive linemen on kickoff returns this year. Fullbacks, blocking tight ends and big backs will take their places. These guys are used to blocking blitzing linebackers, safeties and corners alone.

This will mean some of those many 4th, 5th and 6th round draft picks Dallas owns could be earmarked for smaller special-teams guys. Curtis was not tendered last month and has moved on. I had written before that Dallas will likely draft a fullback to replace him, since it needs a dependable hammer who can lead the three-headed Marion-Felix-Tashard monster on inside running plays.

I feel even more strongly the team will draft one now. The new wedge rules makes me think Dallas may now draft a fullback and a big blocking tight end.
The rule could also shape Dallas' and other team's thoughts about the backup linemen they activate. Dallas often activated seven offensive linemen on game day, the five starters and two backups who could cover the five line positions. If the Cowboys played next week and the old rules were in place, the backups would likely be Cory Proctor, who can play guard and center -- and who played wedge in '07 when he was a backup -- and Pat McQuistan, who has played wedge the past two seasons.

Under the new rules, Proctor would likely retain one spot, ahead of Montrae Holland, because he can play center. McQuistan had an edge at tackle because he doubled on the wedge. If that role disappears, the door is open for Doug Free, or some hotshot rookie draftee to make a push.

Back to Felix Jones. I think he and other talented returners will survive just fine. Kickoffs will now be treated as gigantic screen plays. Think of how often a good runner thrives in space on a screen pass, even when his linemen are whiffing one-on-one in space.

Cats can adapt, and Felix Jones is one crafty cat.
 

SDogo

Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ev
Messages
13,900
Reaction score
6
Article makes me feel batter about taking a FB in my mock. Now it's more then a little wishfull thinking on my part. lol
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,115
Reaction score
11,468
I do hate this rule, because Felix is one of the best I've ever seen at patiently waiting behind the wedge for a little crease and then hitting it. Most guys, even pretty good returners, get impatient and just run up in there before there's really an opening.

But oh well, Felix should be great in any kind of broken field situation.

And it is a totally pansy rule. Goodell is going to ruin this league if he doesn't slow down.
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
yep i think thats why the cowboys looked at dan skuta the other day, he was a linebacker/DE but most likely will play OLB, and he played a little fullback and he also was a long snapper

so i do think the cowboys will get another big huge TE for blocking or fullback
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
thats why i wanted jarvoski lane earlier, but he was in lufkin where i live and reports are he ran terribly, weighed like 297, ran a 40 like 5.05 at RB/FB

like i said he is lazy and doesnt work, we dont need that, unless he grows up and sure doesnt look like it
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
The rule is a good one IMO. We'll see. Hopefully they'll monitor injuries on kickoffs to insure the rule has a positive effect and not a negative one.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
I hope they stop changing and making all these sissy rules. that's why they get paid the big bucks for playing a risky game. they're making it less fun to watch. gonna be less ko returns for tds or big gains. you can't hit a qb anymore without getting a flag. defenses can't do anything these days without getting a flag. they told the referees to cut back on holding penalties that wipe out big plays mainly passing plays. Marion Barber isn't allowed to use his stiff arm anymore. the league is gonna be losing more and more fans every year if they keep going at this pace.
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
vela always makes good articles

i think i will go back if i can and look at coverages before the wedge took form to get some ideals for the cowboys to use
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
Initially I did not like this rule, but if it allows the Cowboys to get rid of some weak links like Proctor, McQuistan and Anderson, I am all for it.


Free is like a big TE and is much better blocking in space than either McQuistan or Holland, I think he is finally active on gamedays.


Cowboys will continue to stock up on hybrid TEs/FBs & LBs, who usually make the best ST players IMO.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
I find it really hard to believe that McQuistan was active each game because he played on the wedge. More likely he played on the wedge because he was active.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
AbeBeta;2709403 said:
I find it really hard to believe that McQuistan was active each game because he played on the wedge. More likely he played on the wedge because he was active.

that's true, he was active because he was the immediate backup at both LT and RT

I'm sure ability to play on the wedge was a bonus for him
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
JerryAdvocate;2709406 said:
that's true, he was active because he was the immediate backup at both LT and RT

I'm sure ability to play on the wedge was a bonus for him

Vela sometimes over thinks stuff like this.
 

fanfromvirginia

Inconceivable!
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
164
Another angle on this new rule that I've mentioned elsewhere: replacing Read with DeC. Are we going to suffer because DeC is particularly good at wedges or will we benefit because he's particularly good at coaching special teams in general? In other words, will he be able to adapt to the change or will some of his relative advantage be lost?
 
Top