Building the Cowboys Roster: Assessing The 2015 Offseason

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
The Cowboys, in no small part due to the fact that they had 23 impending free agents, went into this offseason with a lot of questions to answer. Nevertheless, they spent wisely, managing to get excellent value for their dollars as well as their draft picks. As a result, the 2015 iteration of your Beloved 'Boys reflects the priorities of its head coach: youth, depth, athleticism.

Back in mid-February, I offered up a series of posts in which I looked at the offseason task facing our fave team. My starting point was to imagine I was a member of the Dallas braintrust, tasked to address a pair of questions: first, what positions need to be filled and/or replaced? and second, how might we best address those roster spots: via free agency? the draft? a combination of the two? The first step was to take a long, hard look at the Cowboys roster. As we waved goodbye to the 2014 campaign and to the legion of Cowboys whose contracts expired as the season did, a gander at the Cowboys' depth chart offered myriad questions:

How would they proceed in free agency? How would they prioritize their 23 free agents, sixteen of whom were of the unrestricted type? If forced to choose, which of their two offensive superstars would they retain, Dez Bryant or DeMarco Murray? What would they do at right tackle, where both players who logged serious snaps in 2014 were UFAs? Would they try to keep any of the eight front-seven players who would be going on the open market? If so, who would they prioritize? If not, how could they afford to fill all those positions so that their hand wasn't forced in the draft?

See? A lot of questions. The Cowboys had seven draft picks and a decent but not exorbitant amount of free agent money with which to try to answer them. For the most part, they used these limited resources efficiently, engineering a roster overhaul that, for the second consecutive year, was particularly impressive on the defensive side of the ball.

linkhttp://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/5/15/8548007/building-the-cowboys-roster-assessing-the-2015-offseason
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
The Cowboys, in no small part due to the fact that they had 23 impending free agents, went into this offseason with a lot of questions to answer. Nevertheless, they spent wisely, managing to get excellent value for their dollars as well as their draft picks. As a result, the 2015 iteration of your Beloved 'Boys reflects the priorities of its head coach: youth, depth, athleticism.

Back in mid-February, I offered up a series of posts in which I looked at the offseason task facing our fave team. My starting point was to imagine I was a member of the Dallas braintrust, tasked to address a pair of questions: first, what positions need to be filled and/or replaced? and second, how might we best address those roster spots: via free agency? the draft? a combination of the two? The first step was to take a long, hard look at the Cowboys roster. As we waved goodbye to the 2014 campaign and to the legion of Cowboys whose contracts expired as the season did, a gander at the Cowboys' depth chart offered myriad questions:

How would they proceed in free agency? How would they prioritize their 23 free agents, sixteen of whom were of the unrestricted type? If forced to choose, which of their two offensive superstars would they retain, Dez Bryant or DeMarco Murray? What would they do at right tackle, where both players who logged serious snaps in 2014 were UFAs? Would they try to keep any of the eight front-seven players who would be going on the open market? If so, who would they prioritize? If not, how could they afford to fill all those positions so that their hand wasn't forced in the draft?

See? A lot of questions. The Cowboys had seven draft picks and a decent but not exorbitant amount of free agent money with which to try to answer them. For the most part, they used these limited resources efficiently, engineering a roster overhaul that, for the second consecutive year, was particularly impressive on the defensive side of the ball.

linkhttp://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/5/15/8548007/building-the-cowboys-roster-assessing-the-2015-offseason

The Cowboys did a great job with their 1st two picks, and then the Collins signing was great. The signing of Hardy has been really great. The Defense has improved and I think the Cowboys will make at least one more big move before the season starts. Overall it's been a good offseason.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
The Cowboys did a great job with their 1st two picks, and then the Collins signing was great. The signing of Hardy has been really great. The Defense has improved and I think the Cowboys will make at least one more big move before the season starts. Overall it's been a good offseason.

the climb in talent acquisition lately has this joint jumpin
been a lot of fun
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,309
Reaction score
102,233
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
the climb in talent acquisition lately has this joint jumpin
been a lot of fun

A huge difference on here than from this time last year. That is for sure.

Can't wait for TC to see the RB's behind the OL. Though may still be hard to really tell with 1st, 2nd, 3rd teams playing different amount of snaps. But that's what the coaches are for, then we need to take the mediots for what they report.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
We may not bring in a RB or not till training camp is opened.
I can't imagine there is not a lot of phone calling in that regards.
It might well be that the only reason there is not a new RB vet
in town is the new financial structures
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
We may not bring in a RB or not till training camp is opened.
I can't imagine there is not a lot of phone calling in that regards.
It might well be that the only reason there is not a new RB vet
in town is the new financial structures

I agree with you. I think the time to do a trade is toward the end of training camp after you have completely evaluated
the RB's you have now and other teams are looking to dress up their lineups before the season commences. There
will be some good trades available during those last days.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
We've taken a lot of risks this year. We haven't been risk takers in the past. We always get upset when teams like New England draft or sign guys with issues (injury, character, what have you) and we say, "The Patriots! They keep making genius moves and keep getting better." Sometimes it works out for them and sometimes it doesn't. That's why it's called a risk. If it wasn't a risk, everyone would be after these guys. The good thing about Dallas now is that, not unlike New England, we've finally built a family-like environment that can possibly house these dysfunctional players. That's why it's possible for guys like McClain, Hardy, Gregory and Dez to all thrive. But it's still a risk. People need to tap the breaks because we're letting this all get to our heads. There's a chance things might implode. But I'm betting they won't.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
We've taken a lot of risks this year. We haven't been risk takers in the past. We always get upset when teams like New England draft or sign guys with issues (injury, character, what have you) and we say, "The Patriots! They keep making genius moves and keep getting better." Sometimes it works out for them and sometimes it doesn't. That's why it's called a risk. If it wasn't a risk, everyone would be after these guys. The good thing about Dallas now is that, not unlike New England, we've finally built a family-like environment that can possibly house these dysfunctional players. That's why it's possible for guys like McClain, Hardy, Gregory and Dez to all thrive. But it's still a risk. People need to tap the breaks because we're letting this all get to our heads. There's a chance things might implode. But I'm betting they won't.

I like your angle.
No guts no glory
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,541
Reaction score
38,181
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They added 2 day 1 talents to the offensive line in the draft

Added a pro bowl DE

Hedged your bets by adding two gifted DE's in the draft. ( I have a "show me something " stance on Russel but I have to admit he is gifted)

Added a potential #1 CB......or FS

Added a potential starting LB.

Carpet bombed the UDFA WR market with talented WRs who play ST ( very shrewed and I believe will pay dividends)

We added alot of talent all over the roster this offseason. Our team is significantly more talented then last season. The downside is that most of it is drafted talent and may not see the finished product of this offseason for another year or 2. But it was a very successful season
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,541
Reaction score
38,181
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I agree with you. I think the time to do a trade is toward the end of training camp after you have completely evaluated
the RB's you have now and other teams are looking to dress up their lineups before the season commences. There
will be some good trades available during those last days.
A guy to keep an eye in, Seattle HB Christine Michael. Incredible physical ability but with Lynch ahead of him and Turbin a 3rd down guy Michael doesnt get work. The added Rawls as a UDFA who is a very good Seattle type and should make a push for the 53, and may not clear waivers.

Near cut down time, I can see them dealing Michael so they dont have to cut Rawls. Michael has two years left on his deal and by the time they need him for a real role, he will be a FA. I can see them trading him for a mid rounder
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
A guy to keep an eye in, Seattle HB Christine Michael. Incredible physical ability but with Lynch ahead of him and Turbin a 3rd down guy Michael doesnt get work. The added Rawls as a UDFA who is a very good Seattle type and should make a push for the 53, and may not clear waivers.

Near cut down time, I can see them dealing Michael so they dont have to cut Rawls. Michael has two years left on his deal and by the time they need him for a real role, he will be a FA. I can see them trading him for a mid rounder
I can certainly see them dealing Michael but I have a difficult time seeing them deal him to us. Unless the offer is spectacular, I doubt seriously that they want to strengthen what may be their toughest opponent in the NFC.
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
A guy to keep an eye in, Seattle HB Christine Michael. Incredible physical ability but with Lynch ahead of him and Turbin a 3rd down guy Michael doesnt get work. The added Rawls as a UDFA who is a very good Seattle type and should make a push for the 53, and may not clear waivers.

Near cut down time, I can see them dealing Michael so they dont have to cut Rawls. Michael has two years left on his deal and by the time they need him for a real role, he will be a FA. I can see them trading him for a mid rounder

I like your thinking and I agree he would likely be a good fit behind our OL. The problem might be
that Seattle would likely balk at trading with a team likely to challenge them for top dog in the conference.
I do think there will be some available trades that could be made if the Cowboys decide that their
current crop of RB's can't tote the bucket.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
They added 2 day 1 talents to the offensive line in the draft

Added a pro bowl DE

Hedged your bets by adding two gifted DE's in the draft. ( I have a "show me something " stance on Russel but I have to admit he is gifted)

Added a potential #1 CB......or FS

Added a potential starting LB.

Carpet bombed the UDFA WR market with talented WRs who play ST ( very shrewed and I believe will pay dividends)

We added alot of talent all over the roster this offseason. Our team is significantly more talented then last season. The downside is that most of it is drafted talent and may not see the finished product of this offseason for another year or 2. But it was a very successful season

And we did all of that with great financial responsibility. Of course, we lucked into a cheap first round talent in Collins, but I believe we can say that Gregory is also extreme value for his 2nd round price. We may need a committee to replace Harris, but we have some young hungry bucks who can do that at low cost.

Looking forward to TC.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,541
Reaction score
38,181
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I like your thinking and I agree he would likely be a good fit behind our OL. The problem might be
that Seattle would likely balk at trading with a team likely to challenge them for top dog in the conference.
I do think there will be some available trades that could be made if the Cowboys decide that their
current crop of RB's can't tote the bucket.

Thats true however at the same time they may have a hard time turning down a 3rd round pick for someone they are never gonna use
 
Top