bwhahaha...Ocho Cinco...bwhahahah

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008...-half-million-price-tag-to-become-ocho-cinco/


JOHNSON LOOKING AT A HALF MILLION PRICE TAG TO BECOME “OCHO CINCO”?
Posted by Mike Florio on September 9, 2008, 2:15 p.m. EDT
There have been no concrete developments in the ongoing saga of Chad Ochocinco since the NFL stepped in on Sunday and prevented the receiver formerly known as Chad Johnson from wearing a jersey sporting his new legal surname.

The issue is the NFL’s contractual commitment to Reebok, and whether Johnson will pay the production costs for the unsold inventory of “C. Johnson” jerseys.

Geoff Hobson of Bengals.com suggests that, for a player of Johnson’s stature, the number will be in range of $500,000.

In 2007, Raiders receiver Jerry Porter was told that he couldn’t change his number from 84 to 81 without forking over $210,000 to cover the costs of unsold jerseys. Last week, rookie linebacker Keith Rivers bought the unsold inventory of jerseys with his prior number (58) so that he could change to his desired number, 55.

We’re still amazed by the fact that the NFL has allowed one of its partners to contractually foist these expenses onto the league and its players. Then again, since the ultimate bill is paid by the players, maybe the league didn’t really care.

One group about which no one seems to care are the folks who bought the jerseys that become worthless. Though Reebok got its money back for the Keith Rivers jerseys bearing a number that he’s no longer wearing, that kid in Georgetown who used his paper route money to buy a “Rivers 58″ is now screwed.

In Johnson’s case, the irony is that his offseason antics surely prompted sales of his jersey to drop, meaning that there are more of the unsold items in stock than there would have been if he’d not launched a relentless campaign to be traded.

So now the question is whether the notoriously cheap Chad Johnson will fork over the money necessary to become Chad Ocho Cinco.

Meanwhile, we doubt that the supply of jerseys bearing his former name will be shrinking.
 

Tobal

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
328
I guess #31 Roy Williams Jerseys weren't selling anyway soo they didn't make him pay
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
I think he would have a case in court. I know there is precedent with other players but not a legal precedent set by a court. Peplaw, can you comment on this?

The argument I would use if I were any of these players is that whenever any player is traded, waived or cut the unsold stock of jerseys becomes just as worthless as if a player changes his name or number. But the player doesn't have to pay for those, even if they requested the trade.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Brandon4Cowboys;2248541 said:
Ocho Cinco would be annoying on his uni. kind of like "Icharo" instead of Suzuki.

Probably unconstitutional and I doubt it'd hold up. You change your name and it's the leagues and teams responsibility to insure a player has a number and other legislated identification on it.

But the player would have to fork over the money to pay for his defense so the league can do what it wants in reality.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
I obviously don't have all the information here, but I think this is really stupid. Does a player have to pay Reebok when they change teams via free agency? Or when they're traded? The jerseys are useless then too.

No player forces Reebok to make mass amounts of inventory. Reebok is making money hands over fists in this deal. Seems to me like it's part of the game. Get over it.
 

Tra_Col99

Member
Messages
267
Reaction score
4
He should join the WNBA. They allow last name changes all the time in that league.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
Any chance this has to do with the season starting and jerseys have been shipped out? Wonder if that is why the league made him wait until after week 1? I may be mistaken but I thought number changes can only occur during the offseason. To be honest, this is the first I have heard of this.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
jobberone;2248557 said:
Probably unconstitutional and I doubt it'd hold up. You change your name and it's the leagues and teams responsibility to insure a player has a number and other legislated identification on it.

But the player would have to fork over the money to pay for his defense so the league can do what it wants in reality.
Heh. Definitely not unconstitutional. Incredibly stupid, though.
 

Dough Boy

Seldom Seen
Messages
2,147
Reaction score
0
Tobal;2248533 said:
I guess #31 Roy Williams Jerseys weren't selling anyway soo they didn't make him pay

Roy changed his number in the off-season which is OK. You can't change during the season.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
All they have to do is put a patch on the old jersey. The profits from sales of the new one would more than cover the cost of the patch.

But Reebok evidently figures that if Mr. Ocho Cinco is crazy, he might be stupid too.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
Tobal;2248533 said:
I guess #31 Roy Williams Jerseys weren't selling anyway soo they didn't make him pay

You missed the boat on this attempt.
 
Top