I’m on the bandwagon so I’m happy with him on board.I heard Dane Brugler state that if Parsons was an edge defender, he'd be the best in the draft. He played DE in high school...
Perhaps his best fit would be as a 3-4 OLB, but I am intrigued.
Supposedly has poor diagnosis/ coverage skills due to lack of time at LB.Not sure he has the length but why would you want to move him? Dude has all world potential as a LB.
No. He can used at times as an edge rusher, and thats what gives alot of value as a traditional LB. But he is a traditional LB. Its not something you want him doing full timeI heard Dane Brugler state that if Parsons was an edge defender, he'd be the best in the draft. He played DE in high school...
Perhaps his best fit would be as a 3-4 OLB, but I am intrigued.
Well, I guess he's answering the question.I heard Dane Brugler state that if Parsons was an edge defender, he'd be the best in the draft. He played DE in high school...
Perhaps his best fit would be as a 3-4 OLB, but I am intrigued.
That dude would be absolutely swallowed by NFL offensive tackles. He has no bend around the edge or pass-rushing tools at this point either I'm guessing. He's an off-ball "run to the play" linebacker that needs to be in a position to be able to rove and freelance a little. Moving him to DE would be a disaster.
YikesHe's a mistake for our football team.
His strength doesn't fit our need imo. We need a guy who covers ground at that position and not a down hill head hunter.
I'm sorry but his skill set just looks so close to Jaylon's that it's scared me off.
This thread is exactly something we would ask about Jaylon.
Now if he develops into a quality pass coverage guy then he'll be a stud but i'm not taking a LB like him for a 4-3 team when Linebackers almost have to play like safeties in this modern game.