- Messages
- 79,278
- Reaction score
- 45,630
Do we care?
Naw the walking dead is on and the NY Rangers are playing.
I'm actually flipping back/forth between the game and NCIS re-runs.
Refs just blew a call that should have been a safety against the hawks. Should have been intentional grounding but they said it went past the line of scrimmage.... It was three yards short of it
Refs just blew a call that should have been a safety against the hawks. Should have been intentional grounding but they said it went past the line of scrimmage.... It was three yards short of it
The rule says it has to be in the vicinity of the line of scrimmage, not necessarily to the line of scrimmage, which makes the rule open for interpretation, which is stupid. Why make it ambiguous?
I always watch these two teams and get impressed with how they built their defenses. Meanwhile, the Cowboys haven't had a great defense in back-to-back years since the 90's
Do we care?
The rule says it has to be in the vicinity of the line of scrimmage, not necessarily to the line of scrimmage, which makes the rule open for interpretation, which is stupid. Why make it ambiguous?
Do we care?
http://i27.***BLOCKED***/albums/c177/relcoh/GIF/image-35.gif
The rule says it has to be in the vicinity of the line of scrimmage, not necessarily to the line of scrimmage, which makes the rule open for interpretation, which is stupid. Why make it ambiguous?