MWH1967
The Cook
- Messages
- 7,114
- Reaction score
- 9,465
Didn't fall for it at all. It's fair. That is if EVERYTHING goes right.So Carroll baits the trap with kind words . . . .
And, of coarse, some here fall for it. LOL
Didn't fall for it at all. It's fair. That is if EVERYTHING goes right.So Carroll baits the trap with kind words . . . .
And, of coarse, some here fall for it. LOL
We still need to start grooming a QB starting next year. Just like the Pats are starting to do with Garoppolo.
In the article it states:
They are a good running team, but it is in large part to Russell Wilson and his yardage. Take away the QB's 209 rushing yards and that team has 460 yards, which would be tied for 17th in the NFL with Atlanta.
Take away Romo's 34 yards and Dallas still has 766 yards, or still second in the NFL... which of course would really be first without Wilson's yards.
Don't get me wrong... I think Marshawn Lynch is a monster, but that team hasn't been running like the best run game in the league if you take away Wilson's yards. Lynch is averaginIg 76.5 yards per game, good for 11th overall. Murray is running for 134.0 yards per game, first in the NFL or almost twice as much as Lynch is.
Yep. Carroll's process just was quicker.
Ah, those statistics.
The fact that Wilson can scramble and Marshawn Lynch can run makes Seattle's run offense that much more potent. DeMarco Murrary IS the Cowboys rushing attack. I really don't see how breaking down who is doing more running for either team serves a purpose other than to say that Murrary is running better than Lynch.
Well, the author of the piece is the one who brings up the statistics, so I was just showing that his "The Cowboys' running game might be ranked No. 2 in the NFL, but Seattle will point out that Lynch and Co. are No. 1" is misleading.
Wagner was asked if Murray was the best RB they've faced this season and he says that it is Lynch. It is then that the author decides to state that Seattle is #1 and Dallas is #2, so I thought it perfectly understandable to point out that Marshawn isn't fully responsible for their #1 ranking (with big help from the QB in that stat) while Murray is almost fully responsible for the Cowboys #2 rating.
It is disingenuous of the author to make the Jump from Lynch being better, to Seattle #1 as proof of that. Disingenuous at best.
Didn't fall for it at all. It's fair. That is if EVERYTHING goes right.
Except they had years and years drafting much higher than we did before Pete arrived. But people like to forget that fact.
Carroll also had years and years of contacts in college football and actually recruited and coached some of the guys he was drafting. Jimmy Johnson mentions this in the documentary about the H Walker trade. He said that he had a big-time advantage in his first few years in Dallas when it came to the draft because he knew a lot of the draftees and knew a lot of their college coaches.
Johnson goes on to say, "why do you think Carroll is doing so well in Seattle? He had the same advantage coming out of USC."
That has helped him a lot in finding the right guys for his team. It played a part in the success there and Garrett and Dallas didn't have that to lean on (and neither did most other teams).
Johnson also talks about Harbaugh in SF having the same advantage. Personally, I really do think it helped Johnson as well as Carroll and Harbaugh.
yeth, what could possibly go rong?
I simply don't believe that's true in the NFL anymore given all that goes into scouting in the billion dollar NFL business.
Also NFL coaches are routinely talking to college coaches these days. See Ro and Saban and Jason love triangle.
"The Rams tried to do the same thing [as Dallas did with H Walker] when they traded Eric Dickerson to the Colts two years before," Johnson says. "But that didn't work out for them because they chose the wrong players.
"The advantage we had was that we had seen the players we were drafting. We had relationships with other assistant coaches, so we knew who to call to get an honest assessment. Why do you think Pete Carroll and Chip Kelly have been so successful in the pros? Yes, they know how to teach and motivate, but they also know how to get the information they need to find talent."
Indeed, with only 56 days to prepare for the 1989 draft after he was named to replace Tom Landry, Johnson had taken Aikman, Syracuse fullback Daryl "Moose" Johnston, Pittsburgh center Mark Stepnoski and Texas-El Paso defensive end Tony Tolbert -- all of whom would make Pro Bowls and help Johnson rebuild the Cowboys.
"...Because a year from now, these guys are gong to be really something."
Looks like Pete gets it.
It's awesome to think how much better the offensive line could be with a year of experience and playing together. If we manage the cap, have a decent defensive draft and maybe grab one solid free agent we absolutely should be in the Super Bowl conversation next season.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...-for-clash-against-dallas-run-game/ar-BB8dZhQ
It is about time.
I was wondering how many non playoff seasons it took for people to get it.
Carroll also had years and years of contacts in college football and actually recruited and coached some of the guys he was drafting. Jimmy Johnson mentions this in the documentary about the H Walker trade. He said that he had a big-time advantage in his first few years in Dallas when it came to the draft because he knew a lot of the draftees and knew a lot of their college coaches.
Johnson goes on to say, "why do you think Carroll is doing so well in Seattle? He had the same advantage coming out of USC."
That has helped him a lot in finding the right guys for his team. It played a part in the success there and Garrett and Dallas didn't have that to lean on (and neither did most other teams).
Johnson also talks about Harbaugh in SF having the same advantage. Personally, I really do think it helped Johnson as well as Carroll and Harbaugh.
In the article it states:
They are a good running team, but it is in large part to Russell Wilson and his yardage. Take away the QB's 209 rushing yards and that team has 460 yards, which would be tied for 17th in the NFL with Atlanta.
Take away Romo's 34 yards and Dallas still has 766 yards, or still second in the NFL... which of course would really be first without Wilson's yards.
Don't get me wrong... I think Marshawn Lynch is a monster, but that team hasn't been running like the best run game in the league if you take away Wilson's yards. Lynch is averaging 76.5 yards per game, good for 11th overall. Murray is running for 134.0 yards per game, first in the NFL or almost twice as much as Lynch is.
We still need to start grooming a QB starting next year. Just like the Pats are starting to do with Garoppolo.
On the other hand, the Seahawks have an all Pro in Wilson and a smothering defense.
let's not get caught whistling past the paved yard, because belief me, it will be no walk in the cake.