dallasdave
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,326
- Reaction score
- 88,063
Pittsburgh at #4 is laughable.
I hope Pittsburg gets the crap beat out of them tonight !!! I hate the steelers !!!!
Pittsburgh at #4 is laughable.
hah i believe Prisco predicted Cowboys to go 5-11 in 2014.
hope he is right about the fearsome foursome.
i can agree or side with your point that GB should not be #1 on this list considering who they lost. #5 maybe. #1 No.
Some people seem to believe Cobb won't be that much of a drop off because Rodgers can make it work with anyone as opposed to Romo needing a Dez and the double teams that he brings to make help the Cowboys O work better.
In 2011 Tony Romo made a guy who was a bust before he was in Dallas, Laurent Robinson, and a bust after he was in Dallas and the guy pushed for 1000 yards and caught 11 TD passes.
Great QBs have the ability to make even below-average to average WRs look good.
I think the loss of Nelson will hurt the Packers. I think they'll be able to replace most of his catches and yards by spreading the ball around to their other WRs, however, they aren't going to be able to replace Nelson's uncanny ability to get deep. My guess is that Nelson has had more 50+ yard TD receptions than anybody else in the NFL over the past 5 years.
Davonte Adams feasted on CB3s last year. This year he'll be facing CB1s (Cobb will typically draw the slot CB) -- it's a very big jump.
In summary, like others here, I think losing Nelson hurts them, and I certainly wouldn't rank them as #1 in the NFL going into the season, although I still think they are a playoff team.
Tell me which team will be the most healthy in January and I'll tell you who ends up at #1.
Losing a 1,500 yd receiver is a big blow. The Pack next receiver Cobb had 1,200 yds and then Adams with 446. No way they are rated #1 without Nelson. Cobb is gonna see more double teams obviously being the #1.
Jordy Nelson isn't fast - he had deep ball ability?
Jordy Nelson isn't fast - he had deep ball ability?