Cincinnati at Miami game thread

taste the rainbow..
Need Halloween to end, I have eaten too many........................

rtp4024.jpg
 
Burnt so bad he had to tackle Wallace or it was 6.
Toasted
 
Wait a second.......I hope Garretts taking notes, cause we have yet to lose a game that way
 
I don't get why that required review. Isn't the spot of the downing where the ball is when he is touched down? It was well into the end zone.
 
I don't get why that required review. Isn't the spot of the downing where the ball is when he is touched down? It was well into the end zone.

It's where the ball was when he was hit. In this case it had broken the plane, making it a safety.
 
I don't get why that required review. Isn't the spot of the downing where the ball is when he is touched down? It was well into the end zone.

Can't lose forward progress, it was in the endzone but very close.
 
Hmm, okay. I always thought of forward progress rule in the case of gang tackles of runners going forward. Never occurred to me that would also apply to a stationary QB.
 
So only the Cowboys lose games in odd ways huh? Tell that to Bengals fans tomorrow if you know any.
 
Was I watching the Dallas Cowboys, just they were in different uniforms today? How the heck do you lose on a SAFETY! LOL! At least I can say my team hasn't lost that way, embarrassing. :D
 
Hmm, okay. I always thought of forward progress rule in the case of gang tackles of runners going forward. Never occurred to me that would also apply to a stationary QB.

I think it is more like the ball was technically in the end zone because it had broken the plane, and he never got it back to the other side before being ruled down.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,660
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top