Clayton: NFL executives predict future of Tony Romo, Dak Prescott

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,462
Reaction score
212,406
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Clink the link for the full article.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/sto...re-tony-romo-dallas-cowboys-rise-dak-prescott

I checked in with five NFL front-office executives to get their takes on what the Cowboys should do when Romo returns, and what the future holds for the veteran QB. I was a little surprised by the responses. Their quotes below are in bold, followed by my take:


Executive 1: Don't mess with a good thing

"Why risk ruining the chemistry? If you could go back to Romo and you lose a game, you could lose the locker room. I would stay with Prescott. There has always been that old thought that a starter can't lose your job to injury. The current players may not remember the Wally Pipp story, where Wally Pipp got hurt and was replaced by Lou Gehrig and lost his job forever."

I was in the locker room after the Cowboys' win over Cincinnati on Sunday, and there is no question that Prescott has won over the room. This isn't a knock on Romo. It says more about Prescott's ability to lead and work with his teammates.

Prescott said one of the things scouts missed on him is his ability to get the most out of his teammates. Wide receiver Terrance Williams swears by Prescott. The offensive line likes the way he works, and it sure helps him to have the best O-line in the league.

The good news is that Prescott and Romo have an excellent relationship. Prescott has said he's willing to accept being the backup. "This is Romo's team,"he told reporters last month.

Romo's situation is complicated, however, because he's owed a lot of money over the course of his contract. That brings us to our next executive's suggestion.

-

Executive 2: Keep Romo, start Prescott

"They could work out the cap consequences of moving on from Romo over the next two or three years. Sure, the Cowboys are somewhat married to Tony because of the cap. But let's be realistic here. Tony has a great relationship with the team and the owners. He's a Cowboy. I think there is a chance they could lower his salary and accept a backup role for the next couple years and stay with the team. Because of his age and injuries, there are no guarantees he can get a big contract as a starter for a new team."

This is an idea I had never considered. Romo's contract is a huge factor in his future.

Before the 2013 season, Romo signed a six-year, $108 million contract that runs through 2019. He's scheduled to make $14 million next season. After this season, the Cowboys would have to take a $19.6 million cap hit if they let him go in 2017. They could cut him after June 1 and save the $14 million salary and take a $10.7 million hit next year -- a net cap savings of $3.3 million in 2017 -- and an $8.9 million hit in 2018. That's a huge chunk of change to have in dead money.

Ideally, Romo could retire as a Cowboy, but he might not be ready to be a backup unless he suffers another major injury. But how many teams will be looking for a starting quarterback next year? Cleveland, San Francisco, Buffalo and the New York Jets are among the teams that could have open spots, but are they going to want an older QB with an injury history?

-

Executive 3: Start the veteran, but get the rookie ready

"It's a good dilemma to have because you have two quarterbacks. I would go back to the established quarterback. You can always go back to Dak if there is an injury or if Romo is struggling. That's not a bad spot to be in."

Many people are discounting the fact that Romo is really good when he's healthy. He's probably a top-10 quarterback when he's at his best.

When Romo starts, the Cowboys are 78-49, and the offense averages 25.4 points per game. With Prescott over the past five games, Dallas is averaging 25.8 per game.

Romo has completed 65.3 percent of his passes over his career. Prescott's completion percentage is 69.

Romo has averaged 7.9 yards per attempt, which ranks sixth in NFL history. Prescott is averaging 8 yards in the five games he has played.

The big difference so far in their careers is that Prescott hasn't turned the ball over. That won't continue, though. He'll have some tough outings, and he'll throw some picks. Executive 3 would like to see how Romo performs with the supporting cast that has benefited Prescott.

-
Executive 4: Keep building a new core

"If you are 5-1 going into the bye week or are close to 6-2 by Week 9, there is no way you should go back to Romo. The players would revolt. You are developing a good core of good, young players on offense. I'd get rid of Romo after the season."

That might be a little harsh, but you have to admit Jones went against logic and came out big in the draft. The Cowboys' biggest needs were on defense. Cornerback Jalen Ramsey seemed to be a natural choice at No. 4, but Jones pushed for Elliott and then tried to trade up at the end of the first round for quarterback Paxton Lynch (which likely would have changed the course of the Cowboys' season dramatically).

Dallas ended up taking Prescott in the fourth round, and the Prescott-Elliott backfield combo has proved to be formidable. Prescott's ability to run the read-option and to scramble opens up running lanes for Elliott. Elliott is the league's leading rusher. His ability to set up manageable second- and third-down plays makes Prescott's job easier.

The success of Elliott and Prescott enhances the quality of Dallas' draft. Third-round pick Maliek Collins, a defensive tackle, is starting and playing well. If linebacker Jaylon Smith, a second-round pick, can heal from his knee problems and become a star next season, the Cowboys would have four starting-caliber players from the 2016 draft. They can build around them and sustain a successful team for several years. The Cowboys have a few more young building blocks, too, including offensive linemen Tyron Smith, Zack Martin and Travis Frederick and safety Byron Jones.

Because of Romo's age, the thought was that the Cowboys had to build a win-now team, but they don't have the cap room to buy big in free agency.

Thanks to Prescott and other young pieces, the Cowboys' future looks much brighter.

-

Executive 5: This story sounds familiar ...

"It's an easy decision for me. Romo is gone. He's old. He's injured. He has back problems. At some point, a franchise has to move on. Dak Prescott gives them that option. I liked Dak in college and thought he could be good in the pros, and now he's showing it."

Romo is 36. He has missed 12 of Dallas' past 17 games with serious injuries, and he hasn't played a 16-game season since 2012.

In 2001, the New England Patriots lost Drew Bledsoe to a serious chest injury. He had just signed a 10-year, $103 million contract. Tom Brady, a sixth-round pick in his second year, came off the bench and took them to the Super Bowl. A dynasty was born.

Executive 5 suggested that the Cowboys should keep Romo on the sidelines and make sure he's completely healthy before playing him. The exec thinks Prescott has shown enough in five games and has proved that the former Mississippi State signal-caller can sustain it in the long term.

-

The verdict

Four NFL front-office executives strongly are in favor of the Cowboys sticking with Prescott, even it means the end of Romo's tenure in Dallas. The other exec thinks the Cowboys might be able to keep Romo on the roster with a lesser salary and a lesser role.

All five execs, however, believe in Prescott's staying power, which bodes well for the Cowboys' future. The rookie's rise means Dallas' long-term outlook is much more positive.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
7,123
Dak > Wentz

Yep I just went there.

Risen's reaction:
girl-waving-hairbrush.gif
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
"Many people are discounting the fact that Romo is really good when he's healthy. He's probably a top-10 quarterback when he's at his best."
You don't say?
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
4,961
Clink the link for the full article.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/sto...re-tony-romo-dallas-cowboys-rise-dak-prescott

I checked in with five NFL front-office executives to get their takes on what the Cowboys should do when Romo returns, and what the future holds for the veteran QB. I was a little surprised by the responses. Their quotes below are in bold, followed by my take:


Executive 1: Don't mess with a good thing

"Why risk ruining the chemistry? If you could go back to Romo and you lose a game, you could lose the locker room. I would stay with Prescott. There has always been that old thought that a starter can't lose your job to injury. The current players may not remember the Wally Pipp story, where Wally Pipp got hurt and was replaced by Lou Gehrig and lost his job forever."

I was in the locker room after the Cowboys' win over Cincinnati on Sunday, and there is no question that Prescott has won over the room. This isn't a knock on Romo. It says more about Prescott's ability to lead and work with his teammates.

Prescott said one of the things scouts missed on him is his ability to get the most out of his teammates. Wide receiver Terrance Williams swears by Prescott. The offensive line likes the way he works, and it sure helps him to have the best O-line in the league.

The good news is that Prescott and Romo have an excellent relationship. Prescott has said he's willing to accept being the backup. "This is Romo's team,"he told reporters last month.

Romo's situation is complicated, however, because he's owed a lot of money over the course of his contract. That brings us to our next executive's suggestion.

-

Executive 2: Keep Romo, start Prescott

"They could work out the cap consequences of moving on from Romo over the next two or three years. Sure, the Cowboys are somewhat married to Tony because of the cap. But let's be realistic here. Tony has a great relationship with the team and the owners. He's a Cowboy. I think there is a chance they could lower his salary and accept a backup role for the next couple years and stay with the team. Because of his age and injuries, there are no guarantees he can get a big contract as a starter for a new team."

This is an idea I had never considered. Romo's contract is a huge factor in his future.

Before the 2013 season, Romo signed a six-year, $108 million contract that runs through 2019. He's scheduled to make $14 million next season. After this season, the Cowboys would have to take a $19.6 million cap hit if they let him go in 2017. They could cut him after June 1 and save the $14 million salary and take a $10.7 million hit next year -- a net cap savings of $3.3 million in 2017 -- and an $8.9 million hit in 2018. That's a huge chunk of change to have in dead money.

Ideally, Romo could retire as a Cowboy, but he might not be ready to be a backup unless he suffers another major injury. But how many teams will be looking for a starting quarterback next year? Cleveland, San Francisco, Buffalo and the New York Jets are among the teams that could have open spots, but are they going to want an older QB with an injury history?

-

Executive 3: Start the veteran, but get the rookie ready

"It's a good dilemma to have because you have two quarterbacks. I would go back to the established quarterback. You can always go back to Dak if there is an injury or if Romo is struggling. That's not a bad spot to be in."

Many people are discounting the fact that Romo is really good when he's healthy. He's probably a top-10 quarterback when he's at his best.

When Romo starts, the Cowboys are 78-49, and the offense averages 25.4 points per game. With Prescott over the past five games, Dallas is averaging 25.8 per game.

Romo has completed 65.3 percent of his passes over his career. Prescott's completion percentage is 69.

Romo has averaged 7.9 yards per attempt, which ranks sixth in NFL history. Prescott is averaging 8 yards in the five games he has played.

The big difference so far in their careers is that Prescott hasn't turned the ball over. That won't continue, though. He'll have some tough outings, and he'll throw some picks. Executive 3 would like to see how Romo performs with the supporting cast that has benefited Prescott.

-
Executive 4: Keep building a new core

"If you are 5-1 going into the bye week or are close to 6-2 by Week 9, there is no way you should go back to Romo. The players would revolt. You are developing a good core of good, young players on offense. I'd get rid of Romo after the season."

That might be a little harsh, but you have to admit Jones went against logic and came out big in the draft. The Cowboys' biggest needs were on defense. Cornerback Jalen Ramsey seemed to be a natural choice at No. 4, but Jones pushed for Elliott and then tried to trade up at the end of the first round for quarterback Paxton Lynch (which likely would have changed the course of the Cowboys' season dramatically).

Dallas ended up taking Prescott in the fourth round, and the Prescott-Elliott backfield combo has proved to be formidable. Prescott's ability to run the read-option and to scramble opens up running lanes for Elliott. Elliott is the league's leading rusher. His ability to set up manageable second- and third-down plays makes Prescott's job easier.

The success of Elliott and Prescott enhances the quality of Dallas' draft. Third-round pick Maliek Collins, a defensive tackle, is starting and playing well. If linebacker Jaylon Smith, a second-round pick, can heal from his knee problems and become a star next season, the Cowboys would have four starting-caliber players from the 2016 draft. They can build around them and sustain a successful team for several years. The Cowboys have a few more young building blocks, too, including offensive linemen Tyron Smith, Zack Martin and Travis Frederick and safety Byron Jones.

Because of Romo's age, the thought was that the Cowboys had to build a win-now team, but they don't have the cap room to buy big in free agency.

Thanks to Prescott and other young pieces, the Cowboys' future looks much brighter.

-

Executive 5: This story sounds familiar ...

"It's an easy decision for me. Romo is gone. He's old. He's injured. He has back problems. At some point, a franchise has to move on. Dak Prescott gives them that option. I liked Dak in college and thought he could be good in the pros, and now he's showing it."

Romo is 36. He has missed 12 of Dallas' past 17 games with serious injuries, and he hasn't played a 16-game season since 2012.

In 2001, the New England Patriots lost Drew Bledsoe to a serious chest injury. He had just signed a 10-year, $103 million contract. Tom Brady, a sixth-round pick in his second year, came off the bench and took them to the Super Bowl. A dynasty was born.

Executive 5 suggested that the Cowboys should keep Romo on the sidelines and make sure he's completely healthy before playing him. The exec thinks Prescott has shown enough in five games and has proved that the former Mississippi State signal-caller can sustain it in the long term.

-

The verdict

Four NFL front-office executives strongly are in favor of the Cowboys sticking with Prescott, even it means the end of Romo's tenure in Dallas. The other exec thinks the Cowboys might be able to keep Romo on the roster with a lesser salary and a lesser role.

All five execs, however, believe in Prescott's staying power, which bodes well for the Cowboys' future. The rookie's rise means Dallas' long-term outlook is much more positive.
thanks for posting, wish we knew who these executives were.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
"Before the survey, each 'executive' was asked their general impression of Tony Romo. Each participant's response could be summarized as, 'He's the one that throws 3 pick-sixes every game and chokes, right?'"
 

Sarek

Povar
Messages
8,032
Reaction score
11,925
So only 1 out of 5 executives said to put Romo back in? More then 1 out of 5 fans wants Romo back in according to the polls on this site. Those executives have no emotional or prideful attachment and that's why most of them are making the right choice. I want to ask this, if Romo takes over and takes the team to the playoffs to lose in the first game/rd, well what has this team gained by that as far as the QB position goes? On the other hand if Dak does the same thing it will mean Dak has gained some playoff experience. I think some fans aren't thinking things through properly. Chances of Romo winning a SB ever are slim to none so why waste the season/time? Move forward not backward. :starspin:
 

Sarek

Povar
Messages
8,032
Reaction score
11,925
I hope this MRI news is just to pump up any value for a possible trade after the season or sooner.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,552
Reaction score
38,183
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I think the awnser is you go with Romo for 2016 while healthy and try to trade him the offseason. At his age I don't know if he would net a first, but he should still at least be able to net a 2nd from a GM/Coach that needs instant results
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
So only 1 out of 5 executives said to put Romo back in? More then 1 out of 5 fans wants Romo back in according to the polls on this site. Those executives have no emotional or prideful attachment and that's why most of them are making the right choice. I want to ask this, if Romo takes over and takes the team to the playoffs to lose in the first game/rd, well what has this team gained by that as far as the QB position goes? On the other hand if Dak does the same thing it will mean Dak has gained some playoff experience. I think some fans aren't thinking things through properly. Chances of Romo winning a SB ever are slim to none so why waste the season/time? Move forward not backward. :starspin:
The problem with this line of thinking is that Jerry absolutely thinks they can win a Super Bowl... this year.
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
I don't think Jerry or Jason will push Romo out of his position this year. If Romo get's hurt again or
can't manage the team then things will change not until. I'm not sure Romo wants to play for another team
even if he was cut next year. I would have never thought Jerry would cut Demarcus Ware but, he pulled
the trigger so he might let Romo go next spring if things don't work out well this year. Romo will get a chance
I think but, only one. Dak is the future for the next decade if he stays healthy.
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
To me, this situation is not that hard to deal with. Dak plays until he has a sub par game. At that point you insert Romo and hope he stays healthy and plays well. In the offseason, you ask Romo to reduce his salary and offer to make him a throwback player/coach. He would be the primary backup and quarterbacks coach. I don't know if he would go for that but if any current player would, it would be Romo. If he doesn't, you take the hit to move on asap so that those cap dollars can build a defense while Dak is still young.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
To me, this situation is not that hard to deal with. Dak plays until he has a sub par game. At that point you insert Romo and hope he stays healthy and plays well. In the offseason, you ask Romo to reduce his salary and offer to make him a throwback player/coach. He would be the primary backup and quarterbacks coach. I don't know if he would go for that but if any current player would, it would be Romo. If he doesn't, you take the hit to move on asap so that those cap dollars can build a defense while Dak is still young.
They aren't going to do that because they want Romo out there for the games that count. Waiting for Dak to struggle is going to be a long wait because I don't think he ever will. They don't ask him to do a lot and he has proven he can do what they ask well. They are just going to have to put Romo in at some point.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,330
Reaction score
64,027
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
thanks for posting, wish we knew who these executives were.
I always want to know who sources are if the story doesn't involve top-secret data, legal consequences or can harm someone physically or emotionally. To heck with it. I am an NFL executive. Dallas' quarterback position should be handled blah blah blah. Clayton should quote me.
 
Top