Collective Mediocy

Garrettop

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,121
Maybe we need a thread specifically for documenting egregiously absurd statements about the Cowboys by the media, for plenty of entertainment(or outrage, if that's your thing) material condensed into one thread. Recently a Nate Davis referred to Gregory as being drafted "Despite a checkered past". 1 failed pot test.

Here's a new one:

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...hen-jones-its-all-coming-together-for-cowboys
[The Cowboys] also lost key defensive parts in Justin Durant, Bruce Carter, Henry Melton, George Selvie and Sterling Moore.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,648
Reaction score
31,939
Maybe we need a thread specifically for documenting egregiously absurd statements about the Cowboys by the media, for plenty of entertainment(or outrage, if that's your thing) material condensed into one thread. Recently a Nate Davis referred to Gregory as being drafted "Despite a checkered past". 1 failed pot test.

Here's a new one:

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...hen-jones-its-all-coming-together-for-cowboys

I fail to see where this linked article qualifies as what you say as an "egregiously absurd statement". Please Explain.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
well to be blunt just how much did those five really contribute to the D last year? So yes I would call this idiot an idiot for labeling them key parts.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,719
Reaction score
30,912
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The one player I agree with in that statement about "key defensive parts" that we lost was Justin Durant, even though his presence was limited to what was an incomplete season. Other than that, I think the rest were probably more accurately described as simply being contributors.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
I think Carter, Durant, Moore were losses, but not franchise altering or team altering as of right now. Carter just too inconsistent mentally, Durant inconsistent health wise, moore has always been a journeyman and while he probably was the worst one to lose he can be replaced for cheaper.
 

Garrettop

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,121
Sure they contributed to some degree, but many players on a roster "contribute". They were not "key". Durant was hurt, Carter inconsistent, Moore is a JAG at best, Melton faded down the stretch, and Selvie was a "nobody".....until he left and then became "key". Every single one of these guys would have been fighting and/or struggling to make the roster this year had they stayed.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
well to be blunt just how much did those five really contribute to the D last year? So yes I would call this idiot an idiot for labeling them key parts.

Go look at the list of CBs from last year.

It should contain Scandrick, Carr, Claiborne, Moore, and Patmon.

Now add up the number of interceptions they collectively had. I believe the answer is '4'.

Now look at the number of interceptions Bruce Carter had last season. I believe the answer is '5'.

In summary, Bruce Carter Interceptions (5) > The collective interceptions of all the corners on the roster (4).

I would argue Bruce Carter contributed a lot.

Did he play to his potential, no. Having said that if you take those 5 interceptions away the Cowboys likely lose at least one more game.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
justin freaking durant,how many games has he ever suited up for us?
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,309
Reaction score
102,232
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I agree mostly. But also look at it not as individual players and contributions. But as a whole. That is losing 5 players from your D.

Durant when lost for the season, the defense struggled a bit until adjustments were made or someone stepped up. Carter had some good games and plays, especially when Ro was not in.
Moore was serviceable but not a loss. Melton had what 2 decent games, Selvie did not even come close to his 2013 performance.

But losing 5 players from your depth no matter how what, still is a loss. However not a great one here, but still need to replace those guys. Which I think they did, and got even better.
However, if any of those guys were under contract and not a FA. Would the team went out and replaced them, unless someone stood out in TC to beat them out. Which may not have been hard to do.
But if Cater and Durant was here, they probably would not have signed Brinkley and Gachkar. We would be looking at draft picks in Wilson and Nzeocha to beat them out.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
Sure they contributed to some degree, but many players on a roster "contribute". They were not "key". Durant was hurt, Carter inconsistent, Moore is a JAG at best, Melton faded down the stretch, and Selvie was a "nobody".....until he left and then became "key". Every single one of these guys would have been fighting and/or struggling to make the roster this year had they stayed.

I understand what you're saying. If you're gonna call those guys "key" losses, then you might as well call every player that we "lose" (or "purposely choose not to re-sign") a key loss. They were average contributors at best relative to their roster status (starter, reserve, situational) and replaceable.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Go look at the list of CBs from last year.

It should contain Scandrick, Carr, Claiborne, Moore, and Patmon.

Now add up the number of interceptions they collectively had. I believe the answer is '4'.

Now look at the number of interceptions Bruce Carter had last season. I believe the answer is '5'.

In summary, Bruce Carter Interceptions (5) > The collective interceptions of all the corners on the roster (4).

I would argue Bruce Carter contributed a lot.

Did he play to his potential, no. Having said that if you take those 5 interceptions away the Cowboys likely lose at least one more game.


For the problem with Carter, look at weeks 12 through 16.

Carter was active, but did not start those games.

Hitchens did start those games.

Getting bumped on the depth chart by a rookie is not a good sign.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think Carter, Durant, Moore were losses, but not franchise altering or team altering as of right now. Carter just too inconsistent mentally, Durant inconsistent health wise, moore has always been a journeyman and while he probably was the worst one to lose he can be replaced for cheaper.

Carter will be replaced by Hitchens at SLB. Hitchens had already replaced him as the starter in the Nickel last season.

Durant will be replaced by Lee.

Moore will be replaced by Jones and White.

Those are all upgrades and probably a huge upgrade with Jones over Moore.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,077
Reaction score
16,851
Not key losses at all. One decent player (Durant) and JAGs. Meanwhile we are adding in (or adding back) to the defense: Lee, Brinkley, Wilson, Gach, Gregory, B-Jones, Hardy. We could also find some usefulness from this group: Jack Crawford, Ben Gardner, Ryan Russell, Kenneth Boatright, Efe Obada and Lavar Edwards.

EPSN and it's parent company ABC have pretty much lost their ball in the weeds in craft, intellect and integrity--and their ratings have plummeted accordingly. Honestly...who takes them seriously anymore?
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,392
Reaction score
7,302
Carter will be missed. He had several INT's that sealed games. The Rams pick 6 was timely for sure. He also led the team in INT's. I would say he will be missed but replaceable.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
Carter will be missed. He had several INT's that sealed games. The Rams pick 6 was timely for sure. He also led the team in INT's. I would say he will be missed but replaceable.

Maybe his athleticism but as a player he was too inconsistent, he was outplayed consistency wise by a mid round rookie.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,313
Reaction score
64,005
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Maybe we need a thread specifically for documenting egregiously absurd statements about the Cowboys by the media, for plenty of entertainment(or outrage, if that's your thing) material condensed into one thread. Recently a Nate Davis referred to Gregory as being drafted "Despite a checkered past". 1 failed pot test.

Here's a new one:

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...hen-jones-its-all-coming-together-for-cowboys
Good thread. I wish the writer of the article example had written "indispensable" instead of "key" because the latter is getting nit-picked unnecessarily. Surprisingly I didn't find any articles today that fit the OP but the day is young. And the media will virtually guarantee more examples will be provided eventually. Wait. I didn't check out profootballtalk.com yet.
 
Top