TheDude
McLovin
- Messages
- 12,203
- Reaction score
- 10,677
Dun know bout you but I'm ascreered.
He signed 2yr for 2.7M (which think was less than the $1.5M per here). Can go to $3.5 w/playing incentives.
Dun know bout you but I'm ascreered.
Lol. Sorry, but *nobody* on this site *ever* made the case that Phil Costa was going to be a better player than a first round draft pick. The question was whether he could give a team meaningful snaps since we had limited picks and more important holes elsewhere. To which you said he was the worst player you'd ever seen in a Cowboys uniform, or whatever attention-seeking overstatement you assured us was the case.
As to Phil Costa being able to play. I'm not going to agree with you. It'll just be me, the Cowboys who drafted, extended, and tried to renegotiate him to keep him on the roster as a reserve, the Colts, who just signed him to a contract with the possibility to start, the Patriots and the Lions--both of whom were also reportedly interested--on the one side obviously *not* agreeing with you. And you, of course, on your side. Continuing to be 'right' because the consequences of being wrong on this topic just like just about every other argument you've made about our OL the last two years is just too painful to ever actually admit. We're thoroughly convinced by your assessment because you say it with such conviction you can't possibly be wrong.
He signed 2yr for 2.7M (which think was less than the $1.5M per here). Can go to $3.5 w/playing incentives.
There is going to be a potential Trench Warfare of the Ages at the Dallas vs Indy game with Costa vs McClain/Bass/Crawford/Herring/ [fill in blank]
Hope it is flexed - don't want to be distracted having 2 games on at once
Lol. Sorry, but *nobody* on this site *ever* made the case that Phil Costa was going to be a better player than a first round draft pick. The question was whether he could give a team meaningful snaps since we had limited picks and more important holes elsewhere. To which you said he was the worst player you'd ever seen in a Cowboys uniform, or whatever attention-seeking overstatement you assured us was the case.
As to Phil Costa being able to play. I'm not going to agree with you. It'll just be me, the Cowboys who drafted, extended, and tried to renegotiate him to keep him on the roster as a reserve, the Colts, who just signed him to a contract with the possibility to start, the Patriots and the Lions--both of whom were also reportedly interested--on the one side obviously *not* agreeing with you. And you, of course, on your side. Continuing to be 'right' because the consequences of being wrong on this topic just like just about every other argument you've made about our OL the last two years is just too painful to ever actually admit. We're thoroughly convinced by your assessment because you say it with such conviction you can't possibly be wrong.
Ouch.
Oh boy just looked at next years schedule. Yup Indy is on there.
Oh boy just looked at next years schedule. Yup Indy is on there.
There is going to be a potential Trench Warfare of the Ages at the Dallas vs Indy game with Costa vs McClain/Bass/Crawford/Herring/ [fill in blank]
Hope it is flexed - don't want to be distracted having 2 games on at once
Our mish mash defensive line who can't play (I read it here) is going to get single handedly dominated by Phil Costa.
I doubt you've read that. Dallas doesn't currently have a defensive line. At least not a starting one.
Highly unlikely someone said they can't play. They don't even exist yet.