Commanders agree to terms with Briggs

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Posted: Thursday April 26, 2007 08:05AM ET

Bears linebacker Lance Briggs wants a trade out of Chicago. If a trade is struck with Washington, at least the Commanders reportedly have agreed to terms with Briggs on a new contract.

Source: Chicago Sun Times
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
well this thread is going to go bananas.

SO there trading up to get johnson and trading for briggs. lol

Busy beavers.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,369
Reaction score
8,142
Gryphon;1470304 said:
Posted: Thursday April 26, 2007 08:05AM ET

Bears linebacker Lance Briggs wants a trade out of Chicago. If a trade is struck with Washington, at least the Commanders reportedly have agreed to terms with Briggs on a new contract.

Source: Chicago Sun Times

How do those morons constantly find the cap room?
 

apickmans

New Member
Messages
797
Reaction score
0
this deal was made a while ago when we were orginally talking to the bears, but the trade never happened.
 

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
what are they going to give for briggs? they have nothing. if they trade their first rounder, they wont even have a chance to trade up for johnson, only if they trade their 2045 first round pick.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
I don't remember the trade rumor. Was it Briggs and #31 for #6 or just Briggs straight up for #6?
 

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Briggs waits for the call
Like draftees, 'backer hopes to learn fate during draft weekend

April 26, 2007
BY MIKE MULLIGAN mmulligan@suntimes.com
Sometimes you just need a vacation from yourself, a bit of distance between you and your problems. Just ask Bears linebacker Lance Briggs, who has to feel like he's going through the NFL draft all over again while waiting and hoping to hear his name called by another team.
Briggs wants a trade out of Chicago. He is comfortably planted in his home in Arizona these days, away from friendly inquiries about his trade status, holdout threat or the chances he'll play for the Bears next year. He says he doesn't know where he'll watch the draft Saturday but ensures, ''I'll be watching it closely.''

Does he expect to be traded as the rumor mill heats up with talk of multiple teams showing interest in acquiring the two-time Pro Bowl selection.

''There is a lot of opportunity there, and we have all been working at it to make something happen,'' Briggs said. ''I hope for a positive outcome for everyone.''

Briggs said he's working out on his own and trying to get in top shape to prepare for next season.

''Saturday is a big day, but it doesn't have to happen then,'' he said of a potential trade. ''The trade deadline is the trade deadline.''

It's a lot more likely that Briggs will get his wish for a new address in the next couple of days than in the weeks and months after the draft and before the October trade deadline. But if the Bears do plan on trading him, they probably will have to do it before Saturday.

Briggs technically has no contract. He has not signed the tender offer that comes with the franchise tag and would have to do so before the Bears could trade him. That might not sound like a problem, but it affects the possibility of a deal getting done while the draft is in progress.

Can you imagine, say, Washington on the clock with the No. 6 pick and cutting a deal with the Bears, who then would have to fax the tender offer to Briggs, have him sign it and get it to the league office? If a trade is struck with Washington, at least the Commanders reportedly have agreed to terms with Briggs on a new contract. What if Tampa Bay is the team? Do any contract details have to be worked out?

Briggs said he will be near the phone all weekend and doesn't see any logistical problems that might prevent a trade.

''Every team in the NFL understands the business and how they have to handle a trade in a time period,'' Briggs said. ''They know what they are doing. I'm sure it would all be done within the rules of the league.''

The Bears aren't against the idea of trading Briggs. What's clear from comments general manager Jerry Angelo made Tuesday is that they love the idea of trading out of the first round. If they were to rekindle the Washington deal, Angelo said they have a player they could pick at No. 6, believed to be LSU safety LaRon Landry. The No. 6 pick also could be in play for Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn or Oklahoma running back Adrian Peterson should either of them fall.

The Bears still would prefer to trade down, even if they wound up that high. If no deal is made and their first pick is No. 31, they are hoping interest in Stanford quarterback Trent Edwards could put that pick in play.

''I'm never going to rule that out,'' Angelo said of trading down. ''We might be under the radar in terms of the names of these people, but it's not like we are in a vacuum and we're not understanding of what is down there. I'm not afraid to extend on a player based on his traits or his unknowns.''
 

riggo

Benched
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
i dont see how this deal makes much sense. the skins have fletcher, washington and macintosh. 2 out of 3 are pretty damn good players and mac may be good.

and after the arch fiasco last year, i dont trust williams so much.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
riggo;1470379 said:
i dont see how this deal makes much sense. the skins have fletcher, washington and macintosh. 2 out of 3 are pretty damn good players and mac may be good.

and after the arch fiasco last year, i dont trust williams so much.

Well, Dan "Cowboys Envy" Snyder wants a 3-4 too so he is trying to get as many LB as possible. :D
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
riggo;1470379 said:
i dont see how this deal makes much sense. the skins have fletcher, washington and macintosh. 2 out of 3 are pretty damn good players and mac may be good.

and after the arch fiasco last year, i dont trust williams so much.

mac may suck too

btw, has anything you guys have done make sense? trading Coles for Moss is about the only thing you guys have done that has made sense in awhile, this is just another in the long line of questionable offseason decisions
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,870
Reaction score
112,830
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Bob Sacamano;1470441 said:
this is just another in the long line of questionable offseason decisions
And some complain about Mr. Jones being the GM for our team. Imagine what it's like in DC.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
big dog cowboy;1470552 said:
And some complain about Mr. Jones being the GM for our team. Imagine what it's like in DC.

it doesn't seem to offend Commander fans too much
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,109
Reaction score
6,542
Gryphon;1470304 said:
Posted: Thursday April 26, 2007 08:05AM ET

Bears linebacker Lance Briggs wants a trade out of Chicago. If a trade is struck with Washington, at least the Commanders reportedly have agreed to terms with Briggs on a new contract.

Source: Chicago Sun Times
That's a stupid post. He's under contract. It would be tampering.
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
Skins fans should pray to whatever god they believe in that this trade doesn't go down.
 

Q_the_man

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
578
dfense;1470793 said:
That's a stupid post. He's under contract. It would be tampering.

He's a franchise player, he's not under contract he can sign a contract with any team he wants, but Chicago has the right to match or let him go for 2 first rounders............
 

SkinsandTerps

Commanders Forever
Messages
7,627
Reaction score
125
Q_the_man;1470932 said:
He's a franchise player, he's not under contract he can sign a contract with any team he wants, but Chicago has the right to match or let him go for 2 first rounders............

2 first rounders is not written in stone. Teams find what deal is best for them.

And at least you realize that he is still technically a FA.

Personally I think Briggs is a great player, but at the same time think the Commanders may have other needs besides LB.
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
SkinsandTerps;1470944 said:
2 first rounders is not written in stone. Teams find what deal is best for them.

And at least you realize that he is still technically a FA.

Personally I think Briggs is a great player, but at the same time think the Commanders may have other needs besides LB.

And I wonder if Briggs would be as great in the Skins' system anyway... to me, the secret of his success in Chicago was having a dominating defensive line tying up blockers, letting him run to the ball more or less unimpeded...

Nobody has mistaken Washington's defensive line for a dominating unit in some time now...
 
Top