Commanders... LOL... from Boston Globe

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
I guess the excuse for the bad offense is "Al Saunders is holding everything back!!!"...ok, so whats the excuse for the bad defense?

Protect and serve: Line was up to the challenge
By Mike Reiss, Globe Staff | August 28, 2006

FOXBOROUGH -- When a team sends an extra rusher more than 50 percent of the time, as the Commanders did Saturday night against the Patriots' first-unit offense, the challenge to protect the quarterback can be immense.

Yet the Patriots came up aces in this category in their 41-0 victory, as Tom Brady wasn't sacked, and absorbed only a few hits.

``Washington gives you some tough situations to block, so it was good for us," said coach Bill Belichick. ``We got a lot of good looks."

With Brady under center, the Patriots attempted 33 passes, including three plays in which pass interference was called. The Commanders brought extra rushers 17 times, going 14 times with five rushers and once each with six, seven, and eight rushers.

The team's top six offensive linemen -- left tackle Matt Light, left guard Logan Mankins, centers Dan Koppen and Russ Hochstein, right guard Stephen Neal, and right tackle Ryan O'Callaghan -- fended off the charge while also receiving help from the running backs and tight ends.

``Blitz pickup is such a team thing," Belichick said. ``There is a lot of coordination that has to happen, just from a blocking standpoint."

Several of the Patriots' biggest offensive plays by the first team came against the blitz, as Corey Dillon's 39-yard screen pass was against a six-man rush and Brady connected with Troy Brown for a 13-yard strike in the face of a seven-man rush. The connection with Brown set up Benjamin Watson's 6-yard touchdown reception, when Watson initially stayed in to block before releasing as the Commanders rushed eight players.

Even on the few occasions rushers did get to Brady, the Patriots still had success. Normally reliable Kevin Faulk missed one second-quarter assignment, but before Brady was knocked to the ground he found Watson over the middle for a 35-yard hookup.

Brady praised the offensive front after the game.

``Every challenge that gets thrown at them, they take it," he said. ``The pass protection was great. I love having those guys out there in front of me."
 

ravidubey

Active Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
20
If that team isn't odds-on favorites to return to the Superbowl I don't know who is. Makes me really regret that whole Jimmy Johnson/barry Switzer debacle in the early 90's.
 

Daudr

New Member
Messages
827
Reaction score
0
dbair1967 said:
Protect and serve: Line was up to the challenge
By Mike Reiss, Globe Staff | August 28, 2006

FOXBOROUGH -- When a team sends an extra rusher more than 50 percent of the time, as the Commanders did Saturday night against the Patriots' first-unit offense, the challenge to protect the quarterback can be immense.
With Brady under center, the Patriots attempted 33 passes, including three plays in which pass interference was called. The Commanders brought extra rushers 17 times, going 14 times with five rushers and once each with six, seven, and eight rushers.

Holy crap! I wish this game had been nationally televised. ***? I thought this was preseason, and yet the 'skins blitzed over 50% - ROFLMAO!
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
They've been constantly blitzing all preseason and then the fans have been *****ing that teams have run flea-flickers and reverses.
 

MossBurner

New Member
Messages
505
Reaction score
0
Daudr said:
Holy crap! I wish this game had been nationally televised. ***? I thought this was preseason, and yet the 'skins blitzed over 50% - ROFLMAO!

Washington blitzed 17 times. That's hardly half of NE's offensive snaps.
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
Read the article. It says with BRADY UNDER CENTER the Pats ran 33 plays and the skins sent more than 4 rushers 17 times. Last time I checked 17 is more than 50% of 33. Now you know!
 

Daudr

New Member
Messages
827
Reaction score
0
MossBurner said:
Washington blitzed 17 times. That's hardly half of NE's offensive snaps.

Actually, if you read the first post you would see that it was over 50%. They had 33 pass attempts and 17 of those were blitz packages from Washington.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
MossBurner said:
Washington blitzed 17 times. That's hardly half of NE's offensive snaps.

17 times in the first 34 plays?

That would be half wouldnt it

David
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Offensively the Pats will be OK- its on the D that they have lost some people.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Easy guys, math is hard on some people. It is after all a very logical subject.
 

Uh-Oh

Member
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
17/33 = 0.5151...

Looks like more than 50% to me. But what do I know? Besides arithmetic.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
MossBurner said:
Washington blitzed 17 times. That's hardly half of NE's offensive snaps.

The Sportscenter clips of the game did remind me of someone that punched Kevin [SIZE=-1]Gilbride though... No, 42 isn't the answer... More like "The 46 D", but I'm sure the great defensive mind that is [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Gregg Williams wouldn't never employ something as stupid as the 46 defense in todays NFL. He may toy with the idea and get his lunch eaten ala an August 26th pre-season game, but never in the regular season. The 46 defense died with the emergence of the West Coast (quick short yardage passing) Offense.[/SIZE]
 

30yrheel

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,076
Reaction score
362
Hostile said:
Easy guys, math is hard on some people. It is after all a very logical subject.
Especially for skins fans (MossBurner)!:laugh2:

They've been whining all preseason about teams running a reverse and a flea flicker, yet they've been constantly blitzing the crap out of teams. I know that's Williams style of defense but if you're so "vanilla" on offense maybe you should be changing up on defense too. Other teams are just learning how to attack his defense better.
As they say, live by the blitz, die by the blitz.:skins:
 

Uh-Oh

Member
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
nyc said:
The Sportscenter clips of the game did remind me of someone that punched Kevin [SIZE=-1]Gilbride though... No, 42 isn't the answer... More like "The 46 D", but I'm sure the great defensive mind that is [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Gregg Williams wouldn't never employ something as stupid as the 46 defense in todays NFL. He may toy with the idea and get his lunch eaten ala an August 26th pre-season game, but never in the regular season. The 46 defense died with the emergence of the West Coast (quick short yardage passing) Offense.[/SIZE]
Buddy "Break his legs" Ryan.
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
Is Mossburner searching feverishly for a calculator that computes Commander logic?:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:
 

CowboyWay

If Coach would have put me in, we'd a won State
Messages
4,445
Reaction score
554
The Commanders defense has been very lucky the last few years. It was only a matter of time when a team, or the league figured out thier blitz packages and made them pay the ultimate price. All it takes is one team to figure it out, and the rest of the teams copy it from there.

Don't think for a second that every team that plays the skins this year will be looking at the patriots tape.

You live by the blitz, you die by the blitz. Simple as that.

WHat else do the Commanders have on defense? Zero pass rush, so they have to blitz.

Greg Williams will be flipping burgers this time next year.
 
Top