Awakened;4308818 said:Tebow has it. Staubauch had it. Aikman had it. I'm sorry to say guys, but Romo doesn't.
Micheal Irvin had it to, and he said he'd rather play with Tebow than Romo. Nuff said.
tupperware;4308963 said:Relevant:
![]()
Risen Star;4308847 said:I don't know what more he could have done in that game. I thought he played at an elite level.
casmith07;4309071 said::laugh2:
http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Game%20Intros/0739e33d.gif

tupperware;4309064 said:Stupidity is usually met with stupidity.
You should have known better than to put yourself out there like that with your "I'm fading as a fan" line. People who do that kind of thing deserve to be ridiculed until they finally do fade away.
tupperware;4309084 said:
CutMeMick;4309085 said:The results, and many excuses by you Romo apologists, speak for themselves. Romo piles up all the numbers during the season, but when it counts, when a game needs to taken by the throat, he & whatever assortment of players around him have continually failed.
The only folks who would still argue that Romo is a batter clutch QB than Eli are the apologists, who're now so used to coming up short, that anything but the truth will suffice.
And stop with the "if only he had a better defense", or, "if only (fill in the blank) had caught that ball, or, " Poor Tony deserves better"......blah blah blah. Face it- he a good/very good QB at times...but NOT a winner when it counts. Period.
Its pathetic to see the denial around here- sheesh, he hasn't won squat & the window is closing. Next year you'll have the same excuses as you did this year, & the year before that.
Pathetic.
Awakened;4309096 said:Whoa there. I guess I just have a little bit more of a sense of humor about the whole thing. Lighten up bud.
Awakened;4309099 said:What grade are you guys in?
Awakened;4309099 said:What grade are you guys in?
tupperware;4309106 said:No sense of humor?

tupperware;4309103 said:I don't understand it. In one sentence you'll say "Romo and the players around him". Then next you'll go on to make player to player comparisons without factoring in their respective teams.
If you want to make the case that our team comes up small in big spots I don't think I'll disagree with you there. In fact, I'll also say that Romo isn't perfect. He has, by himself, lost us some in his career.
But this nonsense about "when it counts" and trying to imply that he was the reason we lost last night is nonsense. THIS TEAM HAS A HABIT OF COMING UP SHORT. Romo is a part of that team and Romo can not always win in spite of that team.
The same goes for the rest of our team, sometimes they'll play a solid game and Romo will wet the bed with boneheaded plays. Still, on the whole, we win and lose as a team. Sometimes specific parts are more culpable but in no way was Romo the reason last night. It also seems some posters are force fed their opinions from the media and just run with it.
Not to mention the fact he moved the ball some 45 yards with less than 50 seconds on the clock and no timeouts to get us in field goal range.Hostile;4308832 said:4 TDs. 0 INTs. 321 yards passing. Brought us back from behind 4 times in the game.
And some fans still whine. Mind boggling.
I was talking with an old friend today and he thinks the Defense is fine. "This one is on Romo." Reminds me why I never did drugs.
Hostile;4308832 said:4 TDs. 0 INTs. 321 yards passing. Brought us back from behind 4 times in the game.
And some fans still whine. Mind boggling.
I was talking with an old friend today and he thinks the Defense is fine. "This one is on Romo." Reminds me why I never did drugs.
Hostile;4308832 said:4 TDs. 0 INTs. 321 yards passing. Brought us back from behind 4 times in the game.
And some fans still whine. Mind boggling.
I was talking with an old friend today and he thinks the Defense is fine. "This one is on Romo." Reminds me why I never did drugs.
CutMeMick;4309085 said:The results, and many excuses by you Romo apologists, speak for themselves. Romo piles up all the numbers during the season, but when it counts, when a game needs to be taken by the throat, he & whatever assortment of players around him have continually failed.
The only folks who would still argue that Romo is a better clutch QB than Eli are the apologists, who're now so used to coming up short, that anything but the truth will suffice.
And stop with the "if only he had a better defense", or, "if only (fill in the blank) had caught that ball", or, " Poor Tony deserves better"......blah blah blah. Face it- he's a good/very good QB at times...but NOT a winner when it counts. Period.
Its pathetic to see the denial around here- sheesh, he hasn't won squat & the window is closing. Next year you'll have the same excuses as you did this year, & the year before that.
Sad......just tired, & sad. :bang3:
The anti-Romo insanity is galling.Awakened;4309287 said:Tell me about it. The Romosexuality in this place is astounding.
Say it louder.dexternjack;4309342 said:Put Alex Smith on this team and we have maybe two wins, Romo is doing great this year.
CutMeMick;4309085 said:The results, and many excuses by you Romo apologists, speak for themselves. Romo piles up all the numbers during the season, but when it counts, when a game needs to be taken by the throat, he & whatever assortment of players around him have continually failed.
The only folks who would still argue that Romo is a better clutch QB than Eli are the apologists, who're now so used to coming up short, that anything but the truth will suffice.
And stop with the "if only he had a better defense", or, "if only (fill in the blank) had caught that ball", or, " Poor Tony deserves better"......blah blah blah. Face it- he's a good/very good QB at times...but NOT a winner when it counts. Period.
Its pathetic to see the denial around here- sheesh, he hasn't won squat & the window is closing. Next year you'll have the same excuses as you did this year, & the year before that.
Sad......just tired, & sad. :bang3:
