Comps for Switzer

[waldoputty]

Beasley is a comp as well as all the NE slot receivers.
How about Sterling Shepard who was drafted by the Giants in the 2nd round in 2016

-------------------------height--weight--hands--40---cone--shuttle--reps--vert
Sterling Shepard--5'10"---194-----9 3/4---4.48--7.00---4.35----20-----41
Beasley--------------5'8"-----175---------------4.49--7.16---4.14----17-----38
Switzer---------------5'8"-----181-----9 1/4---4.51--6.77--4.00----11------32

Much more agile than Shepard and Beasley with great cone score.
Much weaker and limited catch radius due to limited vertical jump and height
Similar speed.
Lighter and shorter than Shepard but bigger than Beasley.
Key was did not miss game in college (knock on wood)
Biggest knock - not quite a hands catcher

 

[JohnsKey19]

Jamison Crowder. Numbers are similar. Crowder has a much better vertical. Switzer had a slight advantage in basically everything else.

 

[waldoputty]

Jamison Crowder. Numbers are similar. Crowder has a much better vertical. Switzer had a slight advantage in basically everything else.

dont see much special team stats though

 

[rkell87]

4.00 second shuttle is awesome

 

[ksg811]

dont see much special team stats though

For Crowder? He was third in the league in PR yards and scored a TD.

 

[waldoputty]

For Crowder? He was third in the league in PR yards and scored a TD.

really i must searched in the wrong way thanks

 

[PJTHEDOORS]

Is Switzer 5-10? On Dallascowboys.com roster section, he is listed 5-10. On ESPN Dallas roster section, he's listed 5-8.

 

[DBOY3141]

Is Switzer 5-10? On Dallascowboys.com roster section, he is listed 5-10. On ESPN Dallas roster section, he's listed 5-8.

5,8 from combine

 

[waldoputty]

Is Switzer 5-10? On Dallascowboys.com roster section, he is listed 5-10. On ESPN Dallas roster section, he's listed 5-8.

hey everyone, you gain 2 inches by becoming a cowboys

 

[erod]

I think they see Julian Edelman.

Thicker, cockier version of Cole Beasley.

 

[Cowboys_22]

The scores and measurements are well and good but there is no measurement for the intangibles, that is what will separate the great from the good from the OK.....here's hoping greatness

 

[waldoputty]

The scores and measurements are well and good but there is no measurement for the intangibles, that is what will separate the great from the good from the OK.....here's hoping greatness

i would say their intangibles are all pretty good.

 

[SHAMSzy]

Beasley's numbers are much better, we should be comparing him to Lucky Whitehead anyways

 

[waldoputty]

Beasley's numbers are much better, we should be comparing him to Lucky Whitehead anyways

beasley #s better than shepperd?

 

[JBell]

I think they see Julian Edelman.

Thicker, cockier version of Cole Beasley.

I've seen this comparison a few times and I don't agree with it.

Edelman can take some punishing hits over the middle and get right back up. He's two inches taller and 20 pounds heavier. He also fights for tough yards after the catch. Switzer isn't going to try to run over a CB or Safety to try and get an extra yard or two.

 

[DFWJC]

Looking forward to seeing what Switzer can do.

Must admit, he was not at the top of my board when we took him in tne 4th....and Im a UNC grad.
He is good though.

 

[speedkilz88]

Is Switzer 5-10? On Dallascowboys.com roster section, he is listed 5-10. On ESPN Dallas roster section, he's listed 5-8.

They likely just used his college roster listing rather than look up his combine measurements. That's also why they list Mayowa at 240 when he's been 265 for a few years.

 

[aria]

I give him 3 years until he gets his first Pro Bowl.

 

[waldoputty]

They likely just used his college roster listing rather than look up his combine measurements. That's also why they list Mayowa at 240 when he's been 265 for a few years.

i dont think so
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=128217&draftyear=2017&genpos=WR

 

[xwalker]

Beasley is a comp as well as all the NE slot receivers.
How about Sterling Shepard who was drafted by the Giants in the 2nd round in 2016

-------------------------height--weight--hands--40---cone--shuttle--reps--vert
Sterling Shepard--5'10"---194-----9 3/4---4.48--7.00---4.35----20-----41
Beasley--------------5'8"-----175---------------4.49--7.16---4.14----17-----38
Switzer---------------5'8"-----181-----9 1/4---4.51--6.77--4.00----11------32

Much more agile than Shepard and Beasley with great cone score.
Much weaker and limited catch radius due to limited vertical jump and height
Similar speed.
Lighter and shorter than Shepard but bigger than Beasley.
Key was did not miss game in college (knock on wood)
Biggest knock - not quite a hands catcher

I recommend this format because it is easier to read:

Beasley
Height: 5077
Weight: 175
40 Yrd Dash: 4.49
20 Yrd Dash: 2.66
10 Yrd Dash: 1.57
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 17
Vertical Jump: 38
Broad Jump: 10'06"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.40
3-Cone Drill: 7.16

Switzer
Height: 5084
Weight: 181
40 Yrd Dash: 4.51
20 Yrd Dash:
10 Yrd Dash:
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 11
Vertical Jump: 32
Broad Jump: 09'07"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.00
3-Cone Drill: 6.77