birdwells1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,837
- Reaction score
- 4,074
Let me give you an analogy to better explain Spygate. Lets say you made 100K a year and met, married and built a life with the girl of your dreams around your 100k salary. Of that 100k, half of it was made through your job and the other half was made by illegal gambling. The gambling part your wife doesn't know about and wouldn't approve of. One day she find out about the gambling and confronts you about it, you lie and say "yeah I gamble but I really don't play much just small stuff, it's nothing really I can quit if you want me to". She says yes because it's illegal and if you're going to be doing that then she won't be with you. The problem is that the gambling is a big part of how you support your household and what your lifestyle is built upon. You don't want to lose your wife but you can't make it without the 50k so you start gambling again hoping you don't get caught because losing your family is a steep price to pay.
If the taping didn't really mean anything to the Pat success then why risk it after the Commish sent out a letter clearly stating to cut it out. The answer is that it is a big part of what they do. Whenever some takes a chance like that they assess the risk to reward ratio. If taping was a small part of what the did then the would have said "hey lets stop the taping I mean it only helps us minimally and we don't want to get caught and have to pay a fine" in other words ITS JUST NOT WORTH IT. Well we all know that they didn't do that so it must have been worth the risk.
The fine that they suffered was minimal to me. Ok they have been taping since 2000. They have won 3 SBs and been to 4. What owner wouldn't pay 750k and a first round draft choice for that?
The NFL has been trying to sweep this thing under the rug ever since it surfaced. Why on earth would you desroy the tapes, it's not like the pats are going to steal them from the NFL offices? Why did it take Spector to start asking questions for him to look deeper into this situation? The commish looks like some of those congressmen backing Roger Clemens, everytime he speaks he has an agenda and that being to put this case to rest. Something smells hear and I don't think we will ever know the whole truth.
If the taping didn't really mean anything to the Pat success then why risk it after the Commish sent out a letter clearly stating to cut it out. The answer is that it is a big part of what they do. Whenever some takes a chance like that they assess the risk to reward ratio. If taping was a small part of what the did then the would have said "hey lets stop the taping I mean it only helps us minimally and we don't want to get caught and have to pay a fine" in other words ITS JUST NOT WORTH IT. Well we all know that they didn't do that so it must have been worth the risk.
The fine that they suffered was minimal to me. Ok they have been taping since 2000. They have won 3 SBs and been to 4. What owner wouldn't pay 750k and a first round draft choice for that?
The NFL has been trying to sweep this thing under the rug ever since it surfaced. Why on earth would you desroy the tapes, it's not like the pats are going to steal them from the NFL offices? Why did it take Spector to start asking questions for him to look deeper into this situation? The commish looks like some of those congressmen backing Roger Clemens, everytime he speaks he has an agenda and that being to put this case to rest. Something smells hear and I don't think we will ever know the whole truth.