Romo and Dez have torched teams with it.I could be wrong, but even with Romo and Dez and don't recall it being very successful at all.
We saw it a couple more times in Pitt and they both failed. Not sure what the success rate is for the Cowboys, but it has to be poor at best.
Here are the reasons I hate this play with a passion:
1. Overall, it's a low percentage play at best.
2. It takes a perfect throw from the QB. It's not really one of Daks best throws so far in his short career.
3. There is almost 100% chance the WR is well covered.
4. It's a jump ball type play by design, which automatically makes it a 50-50 chance it will work even if things go well with the throw and route.
5. It's a pre-snap commitment. They either have to commit to it pre-snap or not. Once they commit to it, all other options are off the table. We saw this on the first try in the Pitt game. Once they committed to it, the 3 wr's on the opposite side pretty much just stood there after the snap. Go watch the replay. It is kind of comical the way the WR and DB are just standing around having a tea party during the play.
6. Don't get me wrong, I like Dez and what he can give the team, but he's too inconsistent with the tougher catches. In my opinion, the fade is a tough catch almost every time.
I am sure there are more reasons, but given the poor success rate of this play over the years in Dallas, I just don't know why it is attempted anymore.
I hate it, I hate it , I hate it. Can someone convince me why I shouldn't?
Because the reward is high compared to the riskI agree it's low risk play, but when it's a low success rate, what's the point?
It was almost automatic at the end.I could be wrong, but even with Romo and Dez and don't recall it being very successful at all.
We saw it a couple more times in Pitt and they both failed. Not sure what the success rate is for the Cowboys, but it has to be poor at best.
Here are the reasons I hate this play with a passion:
1. Overall, it's a low percentage play at best.
2. It takes a perfect throw from the QB. It's not really one of Daks best throws so far in his short career.
3. There is almost 100% chance the WR is well covered.
4. It's a jump ball type play by design, which automatically makes it a 50-50 chance it will work even if things go well with the throw and route.
5. It's a pre-snap commitment. They either have to commit to it pre-snap or not. Once they commit to it, all other options are off the table. We saw this on the first try in the Pitt game. Once they committed to it, the 3 wr's on the opposite side pretty much just stood there after the snap. Go watch the replay. It is kind of comical the way the WR and DB are just standing around having a tea party during the play.
6. Don't get me wrong, I like Dez and what he can give the team, but he's too inconsistent with the tougher catches. In my opinion, the fade is a tough catch almost every time.
I am sure there are more reasons, but given the poor success rate of this play over the years in Dallas, I just don't know why it is attempted anymore.
I hate it, I hate it , I hate it. Can someone convince me why I shouldn't?
Dak and Dez simply aren't on the same page yet like Romo and Dez are. Eventually they will figure it out.
That back-shoulder throw is tough for a lot of QBs. Not just Dak.
Romo is perfect with it, but he's Dr. Ford or Arnold when it comes to that throw.
I could be wrong, but even with Romo and Dez and don't recall it being very successful at all.
very good, this is much better than the fade, which is a stupid play to run with dak.What I'd prefer inside the 5, is an option look.
A jump ball should be one of 3 or 4 options, including QB run.
Read option, roll right, throw slant, cross, or jump to Escobar, or QB keeper. 5 options there.
Some of these wrinkles are designed for the postseason, situations when a TD is mandatory.
yeah but Romo isnt playing, and dez isnt what he was.Sarcasm? We consistently torched teams with the fade in '13 and '14