Cowboys almost 10 million under the cap

Messages
688
Reaction score
2
I like it. Where to spend it? Hopefully they just hold onto it for when Bryant and Lee need new contracts.
 

fatboygixxer

Active Member
Messages
263
Reaction score
105
respectdatstar;5093491 said:
I like it. Where to spend it? Hopefully they just hold onto it for when Bryant and Lee need new contracts.

I got a feeling we'll resign Lee before the end of summer..his stock is just gonna rise the longer we wait IMO..You'll hear people cry we should wait until he finishes an entire season but guess what; this is the last year of his contract coming up and lets say he finishes the season with a monster year (as everyone knows he's capable). I'd rather re-sign him now and try to save a little while we can. He's an outstanding football player..
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,768
Reaction score
63,194
But one that I agree with.


fatboygixxer;5093494 said:
I got a feeling we'll resign Lee before the end of summer..his stock is just gonna rise the longer we wait IMO..You'll hear people cry we should wait until he finishes an entire season but guess what; this is the last year of his contract coming up and lets say he finishes the season with a monster year (as everyone knows he's capable). I'd rather re-sign him now and try to save a little while we can. He's an outstanding football player..
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
I'd rather wait on Lee because I want to see him play most of the year without injury before giving him a big deal.

I also want to see how his backups do if pressed into action before handing over a fortune to him.

I like him but he isn't young (will be 28 next year when extension kicks in) and he has had some injury that kept him out of games every year so far. Last year was the worse with him missing more than half the year. I don't care how good you are, you have to be healthier than Lee has been to be given a large amount of guaranteed money. I would structure his deal with less guaranteed money and more salary if possible.

The biggest priority on the roster is to secure Dez but we can still wait 2 years on that one followed by Tyron Smith who we still have 3 more years of contract. I think Lee and Spencer are less important pieces but would sign both to reasonable deals but I wouldn't break the bank. I would break the bank on a healthy Lee because of how many turnovers he generates but not for Spencer who is older and doesn't have quite the same ability even though he rarely has missed games thus far. I just don't think Spencer is going to generate the consistent pressure we need to become an elite defense and hope he will be replaced in the next draft or by an in-house option he breaks through this year like Tyrone Crawford.

I really think Jerry and Stephen need to maintain discipline here and not overpay Lee because of his horrible injury history. I agree he is an important piece if he can stay healthy but don't want to get into a cap hell situation with him like we have been in with Rat and Free.
 

fatboygixxer

Active Member
Messages
263
Reaction score
105
Eskimo;5093500 said:
I'd rather wait on Lee because I want to see him play most of the year without injury before giving him a big deal.

I also want to see how his backups do if pressed into action before handing over a fortune to him.

I like him but he isn't young (will be 28 next year when extension kicks in) and he has had some injury that kept him out of games every year so far. Last year was the worse with him missing more than half the year. I don't care how good you are, you have to be healthier than Lee has been to be given a large amount of guaranteed money. I would structure his deal with less guaranteed money and more salary if possible.

The biggest priority on the roster is to secure Dez but we can still wait 2 years on that one followed by Tyron Smith who we still have 3 more years of contract. I think Lee and Spencer are less important pieces but would sign both to reasonable deals but I wouldn't break the bank. I would break the bank on a healthy Lee because of how many turnovers he generates but not for Spencer who is older and doesn't have quite the same ability even though he rarely has missed games thus far. I just don't think Spencer is going to generate the consistent pressure we need to become an elite defense and hope he will be replaced in the next draft or by an in-house option he breaks through this year like Tyrone Crawford.

I really think Jerry and Stephen need to maintain discipline here and not overpay Lee because of his horrible injury history. I agree he is an important piece if he can stay healthy but don't want to get into a cap hell situation with him like we have been in with Rat and Free.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/dal/dallas-cowboys

Ok lets see:

2012: Missed more than half the year as you said but what you're forgetting is that he was still 4th on the team in tackles, 1 forced fumble and one pick tying with our first round cb...sad I know..

2011: led the team in tackles with 105..thats over 20 more than the next player down (Sensy with 75), 10 tackles for a loss and FOUR picks and yes he missed time then too..

2010: (Rookie) Not many stats but still managed NFC Player of the Week and Pepsi NFL Rookie of the Week honors for his December 5, 2010, performance versus Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis Colts, in which he recorded the first two interceptions of his pro career—including one he returned for a touchdown, and one in overtime to set up the game-winning field goal.

So please explain to me the benefit of waiting to sign a player who's value will exponetially rise the more he plays due to to his production (injured or not).
 
Messages
688
Reaction score
2
If we wait, we will regret it. It is just our luck that we wait and he has a Pro Bowl season. In turn, earning a contract that far exceeds the one we would offer him now.
 

Bowdown27

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,448
Reaction score
7,696
I think they resign lee or dez ASAP. I know lee hurt alot but if he steps his game up then the price will go way up.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,010
Reaction score
76,715
Eskimo;5093500 said:
I'd rather wait on Lee because I want to see him play most of the year without injury before giving him a big deal.

I also want to see how his backups do if pressed into action before handing over a fortune to him.

I like him but he isn't young (will be 28 next year when extension kicks in) and he has had some injury that kept him out of games every year so far. Last year was the worse with him missing more than half the year. I don't care how good you are, you have to be healthier than Lee has been to be given a large amount of guaranteed money. I would structure his deal with less guaranteed money and more salary if possible.

The biggest priority on the roster is to secure Dez but we can still wait 2 years on that one followed by Tyron Smith who we still have 3 more years of contract. I think Lee and Spencer are less important pieces but would sign both to reasonable deals but I wouldn't break the bank. I would break the bank on a healthy Lee because of how many turnovers he generates but not for Spencer who is older and doesn't have quite the same ability even though he rarely has missed games thus far. I just don't think Spencer is going to generate the consistent pressure we need to become an elite defense and hope he will be replaced in the next draft or by an in-house option he breaks through this year like Tyrone Crawford.

I really think Jerry and Stephen need to maintain discipline here and not overpay Lee because of his horrible injury history. I agree he is an important piece if he can stay healthy but don't want to get into a cap hell situation with him like we have been in with Rat and Free.

Since when did 28 become "not young" for a linebacker? I can see running back but for Lee? He's only been in the league a few years. Not much wear and tear.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Eskimo;5093500 said:
I'd rather wait on Lee because I want to see him play most of the year without injury before giving him a big deal.

I'm not a big believer in players being 'injury prone' unless and until I see the same type of recurring injuries. Miles' hamstrings, for example, are probably a chronic problem. Otherwise, it's really tough distinguishing 'prone' from 'unlucky.'

The good side of signing a player who's struggled to stay healthy is that you should get a commensurate discount on the deal. I'd sign Lee in a heartbeat at the right number, and that right number should be what you'd pay one of the top 3 interior linebackers in the league right now, with an adjustment based on his inability to stay completely healthy. If Lee want's to bet on his health for 16 games this season, let him do it and sign him afterward to a slightly better AAV deal.

Either way, he's been our defensive leader the last two seasons, and he's just entering his prime. No way do you let him get out of Dallas.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,873
Reaction score
112,836
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
fatboygixxer;5093488 said:
Cowboys almost 10 million under the cap

More cap space than 21 other teams :D...

I call BS. When FA began almost all I read was how screwed we were this year and how terrible Jerry was as a GM because we had no cap room.
 

fatboygixxer

Active Member
Messages
263
Reaction score
105
Idgit;5093559 said:
I'm not a big believer in players being 'injury prone' unless and until I see the same type of recurring injuries. Miles' hamstrings, for example, are probably a chronic problem. Otherwise, it's really tough distinguishing 'prone' from 'unlucky.'

The good side of signing a player who's struggled to stay healthy is that you should get a commensurate discount on the deal. I'd sign Lee in a heartbeat at the right number, and that right number should be what you'd pay one of the top 3 interior linebackers in the league right now, with an adjustment based on his inability to stay completely healthy. If Lee want's to bet on his health for 16 games this season, let him do it and sign him afterward to a slightly better AAV deal.

Either way, he's been our defensive leader the last two seasons, and he's just entering his prime. No way do you let him get out of Dallas.

:hammer:
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
fatboygixxer;5093494 said:
I got a feeling we'll resign Lee before the end of summer..his stock is just gonna rise the longer we wait IMO..You'll hear people cry we should wait until he finishes an entire season but guess what; this is the last year of his contract coming up and lets say he finishes the season with a monster year (as everyone knows he's capable). I'd rather re-sign him now and try to save a little while we can. He's an outstanding football player..

he hasn't completed his last 3 years in the game and keeps getting season-ending injuries.

..We have to stop drafting projects and absolutely must stop extending them for big bucks after only a single year of uptick.

Or we'll never see another World Championship. We've been doing that for 16+ years...

:starspin RedBaLL ExPreSS:starspin
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
Idgit;5093559 said:
I'm not a big believer in players being 'injury prone' unless and until I see the same type of recurring injuries. Miles' hamstrings, for example, are probably a chronic problem. Otherwise, it's really tough distinguishing 'prone' from 'unlucky.'

The good side of signing a player who's struggled to stay healthy is that you should get a commensurate discount on the deal. I'd sign Lee in a heartbeat at the right number, and that right number should be what you'd pay one of the top 3 interior linebackers in the league right now, with an adjustment based on his inability to stay completely healthy. If Lee want's to bet on his health for 16 games this season, let him do it and sign him afterward to a slightly better AAV deal.

Either way, he's been our defensive leader the last two seasons, and he's just entering his prime. No way do you let him get out of Dallas.


But will we get a discount? How do you decide on his fair value? Do you base it on his production when he is healthy? Do you base it on his production per season? It is hard to say for a player like him and even though he is entering his 4th season he is 27 and not 25 as many players in a similar situation might be who entered college at 18 and left after 3 years for the NFL.

The question about his injury being recurrent or not is an important one but noe one that can be easily answered. From what I understand he has torn an MCL, an ACL, a wrist ligament in 2011 and now a toe tendon in 2012. The question I have is whether he has the connective tissue strength to play the game. We know some players seem to be incredibly injury resistant (see Emmitt Smith) whereas others seem to be injured all the time (Felix Jones). Felix's injuries were never recurrent - it went hamstring, then toe, then knee, then shoulder. But after his shoulder surgery in 2011 he suddenly didn't look like the same player at all in 2012.

These are all important questions to ask when deciding on Lee's deal. I don't mind any deal in the $8M/yr range so long as the guaranteed component isn't onerous. Maybe $8M. I don't want to commit more guaranteed money than that to a player that seems to always be tearing something up.

BTW, I think he missed a fair bit of time as a rookie from a quad contusion or strain and that is partly why he played so little in the first half of his first year in the league so there was some injury component there too.

I love the player but I just don't want to give him a ton of guaranteed money and end up in cap hell. Miles Austin was a guy who came close to breaking out in his 3rd year but was injured a lot.

For whatever reason, I'd be much happier giving the money to Bruce Carter because I think his injury history is much less concerning.

There is only so much that we know about the human body. Everyone's tissues are of slightly different strength. At one end of the spectrum are guys with Ehler Danlos syndrome who have scary weak tissue that tears easily. Then there is hypermobility syndrome where we see people that are kind of bendy or double-jointed but haven't quite figured out why their tissue is weak but they get injured and hurt a lot. Then there is normal people who live normal lives without messing up their bodies too much during their young adult lives (except maybe their discs in their spine but that is a different issue). Then there are those rare people who can take the impact of pro level football without shredding up their bodies. Does it not stand to reason there is a spectrum in pro football players of tissue strength that may account for some of the longevity they had on the field compared to their injured brethren?

I don't put much weight on one injury in this sport. I don't even put much weight on two. But when you have 4 of them in a short period of time I begin to wonder if you're going to stand the test of time.

I do hope the team has investigated the numbers on this pattern of injury recurrence before signing on the dotted line but I'm not sure how statistically oriented Jerry and Stephen are. Garrett may be about football but not necessarily about injuries.

Anyhow, I hope Lee plays many years without further injury but I wouldn't give him a huge amount of guaranteed money unless he plays out this year healthy and even then I would only do it begrudgingly because he has special leadership skills and is a turnover machine.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
They should offer a low guarantee with incentives for number of snaps played etc.
 

coult44

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,876
Reaction score
7,653
Idgit;5093559 said:
I'm not a big believer in players being 'injury prone' unless and until I see the same type of recurring injuries. Miles' hamstrings, for example, are probably a chronic problem. Otherwise, it's really tough distinguishing 'prone' from 'unlucky.'

The good side of signing a player who's struggled to stay healthy is that you should get a commensurate discount on the deal. I'd sign Lee in a heartbeat at the right number, and that right number should be what you'd pay one of the top 3 interior linebackers in the league right now, with an adjustment based on his inability to stay completely healthy. If Lee want's to bet on his health for 16 games this season, let him do it and sign him afterward to a slightly better AAV deal.

Either way, he's been our defensive leader the last two seasons, and he's just entering his prime. No way do you let him get out of Dallas.



Lee has had a major injury at every level of the game... And the years he didn't have major injuries he still missed games because of minor ones.. He's great but not reliable because he's injury prone...
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Eskimo;5093584 said:
But will we get a discount? How do you decide on his fair value? Do you base it on his production when he is healthy? Do you base it on his production per season? It is hard to say for a player like him and even though he is entering his 4th season he is 27 and not 25 as many players in a similar situation might be who entered college at 18 and left after 3 years for the NFL.

The question about his injury being recurrent or not is an important one but noe one that can be easily answered. From what I understand he has torn an MCL, an ACL, a wrist ligament in 2011 and now a toe tendon in 2012. The question I have is whether he has the connective tissue strength to play the game. We know some players seem to be incredibly injury resistant (see Emmitt Smith) whereas others seem to be injured all the time (Felix Jones). Felix's injuries were never recurrent - it went hamstring, then toe, then knee, then shoulder. But after his shoulder surgery in 2011 he suddenly didn't look like the same player at all in 2012.

These are all important questions to ask when deciding on Lee's deal. I don't mind any deal in the $8M/yr range so long as the guaranteed component isn't onerous. Maybe $8M. I don't want to commit more guaranteed money than that to a player that seems to always be tearing something up.

BTW, I think he missed a fair bit of time as a rookie from a quad contusion or strain and that is partly why he played so little in the first half of his first year in the league so there was some injury component there too.

I love the player but I just don't want to give him a ton of guaranteed money and end up in cap hell. Miles Austin was a guy who came close to breaking out in his 3rd year but was injured a lot.

For whatever reason, I'd be much happier giving the money to Bruce Carter because I think his injury history is much less concerning.

There is only so much that we know about the human body. Everyone's tissues are of slightly different strength. At one end of the spectrum are guys with Ehler Danlos syndrome who have scary weak tissue that tears easily. Then there is hypermobility syndrome where we see people that are kind of bendy or double-jointed but haven't quite figured out why their tissue is weak but they get injured and hurt a lot. Then there is normal people who live normal lives without messing up their bodies too much during their young adult lives (except maybe their discs in their spine but that is a different issue). Then there are those rare people who can take the impact of pro level football without shredding up their bodies. Does it not stand to reason there is a spectrum in pro football players of tissue strength that may account for some of the longevity they had on the field compared to their injured brethren?

I don't put much weight on one injury in this sport. I don't even put much weight on two. But when you have 4 of them in a short period of time I begin to wonder if you're going to stand the test of time.

I do hope the team has investigated the numbers on this pattern of injury recurrence before signing on the dotted line but I'm not sure how statistically oriented Jerry and Stephen are. Garrett may be about football but not necessarily about injuries.

Anyhow, I hope Lee plays many years without further injury but I wouldn't give him a huge amount of guaranteed money unless he plays out this year healthy and even then I would only do it begrudgingly because he has special leadership skills and is a turnover machine.

This is all reasonable. A deal this season would have to have a discount worked into it, and I don't know how to begin calculating what it might be.

Hearing Lee's interviews, he knows he's had issues staying on the field and he knows that he's got to demonstrate that he can do it to get to where he wants to go as a player. I don't even think it's a question of the impact on his contract with this guy. I think it's about being a complete football player. Given that, I'd bet nothing gets done in any case until after this next season. But, yeah, I'd still risk it with Lee if I could get the deal to work at something less than market value for a player who delivers like he does when he's healthy.
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
Idgit;5093593 said:
This is all reasonable. A deal this season would have to have a discount worked into it, and I don't know how to begin calculating what it might be.

Hearing Lee's interviews, he knows he's had issues staying on the field and he knows that he's got to demonstrate that he can do it to get to where he wants to go as a player. I don't even think it's a question of the impact on his contract with this guy. I think it's about being a complete football player. Given that, I'd bet nothing gets done in any case until after this next season. But, yeah, I'd still risk it with Lee if I could get the deal to work at something less than market value for a player who delivers like he does when he's healthy.

I don't even mind paying fair market value as in $/yr but I just don't want to have a huge guaranteed pot of money attached to it. I think $8M/yr is fairish but I don't want to give out $15-20M SB or guaranteed because of his injury risk.

If the Cowboys actuaries and Lee can come to some valuation of his contract that is reasonable to all sides I'd be happy to do the deal with the kid. He could become an all-time LB great for us if he can stay on the field. I don't doubt his ability one bit.
 
Top