Cowboys Depth Chart for 2015 - Defensive Edition

Nation

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,252
Reaction score
1,919
VyCaIJ6.png

I wanted to take a look at the players that our Dallas Cowboys have under contract for 2015 both to get a sense of where they may lean in the upcoming draft as well as to get an idea for what the actual identity of this team is designed to be. I populated a best-guess depth chart of the current Cowboys team and who is signed through 2015 and for what amount to sniff out where the team may be leaning. I started with the Offense, and now we are on to the Defense. You could make a case for using a 1st round 2014 pick on both Tackle and Guard on offense, as well as a Day Two pick on receiver and running back. That wouldn't be the end of the world if you couldn't also make a case to draft a player at every single position there is on Defense.

3a7i5F0.png
Easily the biggest weakness of the team is the Defensive End spot. At draft time the only question will be whether or not there is someone worthy of the #16 pick, or if someone drops enough to trade-up for. A long running scouting mantra is that Pass Rushers are the easiest players to scout, which is why you often see Top Ten picks at the position often succeeding. DE is both a short term and a long term concern for this team, and finding someone to come off the edge is the only thing that will save this team from last years historically bad defensive performance.
I have my 9-Tech and 7-Tech's jumbled up in here and nobody would really be set in stone, because a healthy Spencer may end up actually your best pass rusher. There is a serious lack of talent here for both 2014 and going forward, and the team needs to pray that some sort of combination of Crawford, Rayford, Mincey, Spencer and Selvie can serve as #2-4 edge players on this team. Ideally those players will be Crawford and Rayford given their cheap future contracts, but perhaps Mincey will surprise. You'd have to imagine that the team is hoping and praying for one of the top "rushmen" to drop tomorrow night so that this position can begin to be healed.

21ud5KE.png
Melton's contract is pretty simple, if he returns as a dominator he's paid as such and if not they can move on. It is pretty rare that you can get that sort of trial period with a young player who has excelled in another scheme, as typically those free agents command long term deals. Opinions on Ben Bass vary but hopefully he can add some sort of depth. It's tough to really say much about his 26 career snaps to make one thing he's worth counting on though.
To me the 1-Tech is a less essential position at least in terms of the money/premium picks you need to spend on the position. Of the 4 defensive line slots it is the easiest to hide a non-versatile starter at. It does seem that the Cowboys if anything have non-versatile starters lined up at that spot, as opposed to any sort of embarrassment of riches. If Melton doesn't work out DT has potential to be just as bad as DE, so a premium pick there won't surprise me either.


8pmxJho.png
Bruce Carter is a free agent after this season. Even if he plays well in 2014 it leads to the question of whether he's putting it all together finally, or if the effort level is due to this being a contract year. That touchdown he let up at the Meadowlands is one that will irk old-school football fans as it was pretty lazy. We did see in 2011 Carter struggled in a 3-4, before being solid the next year after a year in the system. Maybe the same will happen after a down 2013 in a 4-3. Feelings about him going into 2014 are a hell of a lot different than they were in the 2013 offseason though, that much is for sure. It wouldn't shock me to see a 3rd or 4th round pick spent on a linebacker because of al this.
The fact that Lee and Holloman are both under contract gives them some possibilities if Holloman is a player. If Carter struggles and Holloman shows starting caliber play you could move Lee to Will and stick Holloman in the middle if he isn't going to be given the more tradition Tampa 2 coverage responsibilities. However as Lee's contract starts to escalate the team really needs him to be one of the top linebackers over 16 games as opposed to one of the top linebackers over 9 games. The heart of the defense can only have so many angioplasties.
I'm assuming that Wilber will remain at SLB. To me he's a perfectly acceptable player at that position as it is not in the top-half of importance as far as positions on defense go. He's basically solid enough that you can get away with him.

1ORzVD3.png
The amount of players signed here looks a lot better on paper than it is in reality. Carr should be a potential June 1st 2015 cut given how high his cap number is unless he is one of the top corners in the game. Claiborne might enter 2014 penciled in a starting spot just because of his college talent level, but he needs a hell of a year to justify that 2012 trade. Those are the types of moves where if they aren't great players you set your team up to fail in the future by missing out on two cheap talented players. They could have had the equivalent on defense of TFred and TWill, i.e. guys you are happy to have starting on your team but who also don't hold you back financially from making moves to better yourself elsewhere. Instead they have a guy playing plenty-average, who seems ready to make excuses about it, and you are more or less stuck with him. Scandrick will be with the team at least until 2016 just based off of numbers along with pretty good 2013 play. Hopefully BW Webb bounces back from 2013, as he does at least have the athletic ability to play the position and be a decent #3 option down the line.

pk8kxTI.png
Safety is a spot where we may actually have a chance at some good fortune in 2014 and beyond. There are a lot of players signed at the safety position at very reasonable rates. It will now be a matter of A) Can these guys develop into good starters or B) Can the financial flexibility they have at this position allow them to increase the front-7 so that you can hide these guys. It'll be a highly underrated blessing if we can get solid play out of this current crop. I'm a fan of Church and hopefully Wilcox develops into a hard-hitting force back there. Matt Johnson needs to avoid the trainers room if he's going to make the team, and Heath showed little to be confident in.

---------------------------------------------------------
At the end of the day, taking a deep dive into the defensive depth chart didn't make me feel any better about the team then looking at it from a top level. Hopefully this can start to get fixed with some development from 2011-13 draft picks, as well as a monster draft this year.
 

Nirvana

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
12,309
The WLB is a spot that needs a quality player added through day 1 or 2 of the draft. Lawrence is a joke and Carter is a question mark and contract is up after next season. I think Shazier is high on the list for possible picks at 16.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
first thing that jumps out is we have nothing for FA.
after a couple years in a row of losing guys next year will be pretty much a stand pat year.
 

CowboysLegend365

Well-Known Member
Messages
743
Reaction score
826
Never noticed how horrible we are at LB. There's Sean Lee (for 10-12 games) then NOTHING. It's very sad that this secondary is the best unit on the defense.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,857
Holloman is a converted safety. If anything he would go to will I would think.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
Broaddus says a lot of things that don't come true. It depends on when he is giving his own opinion vs information being given to him.

Holleman played Mike well last year in the finale.
Think he is a consideration at Mike with Sean Lee at Will to reduce wear and tear.

Talk is move Carter to compete with Wilber at SLB.

Not sure if team will do all that but it's been reported as makes sense if you want to maximize speed and coverage while protecting Lee.

LB depth is poor as noted above but we have a lot of potential if pieces ever fit.
Carter didn't fit at WLB because struggled in coverage.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
Carter? Spencer?

Carter was benched for terrible play and Spencer is not even certain to be on any team in 2015.
That's basically losing nothing.

I have 'hope' for both guys but it is a far cry from losing 3 or 4 starters as has been happening all too often.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
The draft this year appears deep enough to get blue chip guys at both WDE & LB. As noted above, the rushman is probably our biggest need, and WDE should be our first pick. We have a bit more flexibility in the LB corps, and could work with several of the top candidates. But if Barr falls to #16, he may be the pick due to his Clowney-like athleticism and ability to be disruptive. A scenario of Ealy at 16 and Shazier at our #2 would certainly look good.
If Barr goes first, then we would be left with a Tuitt or Crichton at DE -- both solid picks, and the scouts may think one of these guys has enough upside to be the same value as Ealy.

Finally going to get something done, one way or the other, at long last.

Can't we do this earlier next year?
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Holleman played Mike well last year in the finale.
Think he is a consideration at Mike with Sean Lee at Will to reduce wear and tear.

Talk is move Carter to compete with Wilber at SLB.

Not sure if team will do all that but it's been reported as makes sense if you want to maximize speed and coverage while protecting Lee.

LB depth is poor as noted above but we have a lot of potential if pieces ever fit.
Carter didn't fit at WLB because struggled in coverage.

Carter should be better this year. I don't know if that's good enough, but he should be better than last year due to more time in the scheme. It seems apparent that he is a slow learner.

My guess is that they don't move Lee and that Holloman competes with Carter at WLB with the loser being the most likely to be the starter at SLB.

Wilber was OK at SLB and physically is almost identical to Seattle's SLB. With a training camp of playing LB instead of DE, he should improve.

Durant was OK at SLB and played well at MLB but only last 1/2 game before getting injured. He's a solid backup, IMO.

My guess:
WLB: Holloman, backup Carter
SLB: Carter, backup Durant and Wilber
MLB: Lee, backup Durant
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
I certainly hope so. these last 2 weeks have been BRUTAL.

No feces.

And I heard there was talk of moving it to Memorial weekend -- seriously?

Wouldn't even be time to get anybody on a training program leading up to camp. Probably see more injuries.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
Carter should be better this year. I don't know if that's good enough, but he should be better than last year due to more time in the scheme. It seems apparent that he is a slow learner.

My guess is that they don't move Lee and that Holloman competes with Carter at WLB with the loser being the most likely to be the starter at SLB.

Wilber was OK at SLB and physically is almost identical to Seattle's SLB. With a training camp of playing LB instead of DE, he should improve.

Durant was OK at SLB and played well at MLB but only last 1/2 game before getting injured. He's a solid backup, IMO.

My guess:
WLB: Holloman, backup Carter
SLB: Carter, backup Durant and Wilber
MLB: Lee, backup Durant

Wouldn't argue with any of that being realistic.

Do think they move Lee to WLB IF they feel they have an option.
Rather have plus play at WLB and mediocre play at MLB over 16 games than Pro Bowl play at MLB for 10 games, then below average play at WLB for 16 and MLB for 6.

I've been wrong about Carter at every turn so whatever I think with him it is probably the opposite.
Just a guy I can't get a handle on apparently.
My current guess is he is here for a year than looks for a 3-4 defense to play in.

Durant: Wonder if he truly loves the game. MY perception of him is that he is a solid NFL player with perhaps a wider and more varied interest base than your avg gym rat.

Current thinking is: 6 LBs, 5 on 3 deep with a STer as 6th. (maybe Lawrence)
WLB: Lee, Carter, Church --Church here basically means playing nickel but we'd probably go that route a lot if both Lee and Carter are hurt again.
MLB: Holleman, Carter, Durant
SLB: Carter, Wilber, Durant
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
No feces.

And I heard there was talk of moving it to Memorial weekend -- seriously?

Wouldn't even be time to get anybody on a training program leading up to camp. Probably see more injuries.

Memorial weekend would be insanely stupid.
They'd lose me.
That is basically one long start of summer party weekend.
Even when you are getting old with kids(like me) it is a lake/pool/bbq weekend.
I am enough of a draft nerd and loser without adding --stayed inside and watched draft all Memorial weekend to the list.
 

Nation

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,252
Reaction score
1,919
Memorial weekend would be insanely stupid.
They'd lose me.
That is basically one long start of summer party weekend.
Even when you are getting old with kids(like me) it is a lake/pool/bbq weekend.
I am enough of a draft nerd and loser without adding --stayed inside and watched draft all Memorial weekend to the list.

The Memorial Day idea came from someone saying the NFL is giving thought to holding the draft 1-2 weeks "later" next year. I don't think Memorial Day weekend would ever be on the table simply due to TV ratings.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Wouldn't argue with any of that being realistic.

Do think they move Lee to WLB IF they feel they have an option.
Rather have plus play at WLB and mediocre play at MLB over 16 games than Pro Bowl play at MLB for 10 games, then below average play at WLB for 16 and MLB for 6.

I've been wrong about Carter at every turn so whatever I think with him it is probably the opposite.
Just a guy I can't get a handle on apparently.
My current guess is he is here for a year than looks for a 3-4 defense to play in.

Durant: Wonder if he truly loves the game. MY perception of him is that he is a solid NFL player with perhaps a wider and more varied interest base than your avg gym rat.

Current thinking is: 6 LBs, 5 on 3 deep with a STer as 6th. (maybe Lawrence)
WLB: Lee, Carter, Church --Church here basically means playing nickel but we'd probably go that route a lot if both Lee and Carter are hurt again.
MLB: Holleman, Carter, Durant
SLB: Carter, Wilber, Durant

I agree with all of that.

I didn't know anything about Durant's personality. I think he is a solid backup MLB or SLB.

Carter is a bit unpredictable. At a minimum I think he will be better than in 2014, but I don't know how much better.

I think Holloman can play any of the 3 positions and can be 1 of the 2 Nickel LBs.

The interesting thing with Wilber at SLB is that he would be better rushing the passer on occasion from that spot than a guy like Durant. They did give him some opportunities to be an outside rusher from the SLB position last season.

If they draft a Safety, then I expect Church to play some LB in the Nickel or Dime packages.
 
Top