ConceptCoop
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,440
- Reaction score
- 1,642
In a vacuum maybe, but would you really consider an antonio cromartie in his best season more valuable then Emmitt Smith?
Give me Dion over Emmitt 10/10 in today's league.
In a vacuum maybe, but would you really consider an antonio cromartie in his best season more valuable then Emmitt Smith?
Everybody wants to be Mel Kiper
I wasn't a fan of the Elliott pick, but his ceiling is definitely an A.
Elliott's ceiling has to be A if not A+. I stopped reading at that point.
Ceiling is relative to the draft slot. Elliott was very safe, but he doesn't have high upside compared to the average top 4 pick. B means about what you'd expect from a top 4 pick. Does anyone really want to argue that Elliott has the upside of a typical top pick? At RB?
As a RB, his ceiling is absolutely an A. As a top 4 pick in the NFL draft, I don't think it is.
LaDainian Tomlinson was a B at the 5th pick then? I'd say he was an A++
In a vacuum, as a player, absolutely. But not when position is considered. Nothing Elliott can do as a player will make him a franchise QB, LT, DE, or, on a lesser scale, CB. I think that needs to be accounted for.
Elliott's ceiling is All-Pro RB; Ramsey's is All-Pro CB. I think one is more valuable than the other.
Give me Dion over Emmitt 10/10 in today's league.
That's BS. If he ends up being a top 3 player at his position then he will have easily justified his draft status, which obviously the Cowboys believe he will. And if that's the case there will be often times he will be the best player on the field, and more valuable to the team's success than any CB in the league.
You're an idiot. At a MINIMUM we don't win the SB in 93 without Emmitt. Deion Sanders was a force in 95 but you can't say we wouldn't have won without him.
I wasn't a fan of the Elliott pick, but his ceiling is definitely an A.
no doubt, I would think every first round pick could justifiably have an A+ ceiling
Is there anything he could reasonably do to be as valuable as Aaron Rodgers is today? If the answer is no - and it is - then they different ceilings. If Rodgers is an A+, then Elliott somewhere below that. If Tyron Smith is an A, then Elliott is somewhere below that. If Patrick Peterson is an A, then Elliott is somewhere below that.
kind of a pointless debate but I'll just add that I believe each position can have an A+ ceiling (with ceiling being defined as the top percentile of quality at that position) but an A+ RB is not as valuable as an A+ QB
I agree with you there, depending on how you want to measure ceiling. But I think when you're drafting top 5, positional value plays a major part. I don't expect everyone to agree with me.
Of all the players drafted top 4 over the last decade, you think Elliott has a higher upside than most of them, considering the positional value?
I think that's silly, but at least we know where we stand.