Cowboys Draft Picks (last 5 years)

dadymat

I'm kind of a Big Deal
Messages
6,023
Reaction score
1
thats a MAJOR improvement from the 6 years prior to 2003..........:puke:
 

MONT17

New Member
Messages
3,269
Reaction score
0
who is anderson... do u mean the fB that cant block? ppl cry about the ol then turn around and say anderson is a player!!!


funny to me
 

MONT17

New Member
Messages
3,269
Reaction score
0
Chris in SoCal;2548888 said:
425(121)Bruce ThorntonCBGeorgia

Jared Allen went 5 picks after this guy. Yikes.


On a separate note, it would seem to me that whatever it is that the Cowboys staff uses to identify offensive linemen as prospects is very wrong and we should abandon that philosophy immediately. We have missed badly on offensive linemen. With the age of the linemen now we really need to think about adding 2-3 guys who are good enough to play now in a back-up role but also have the potential to start down the line. Or we can just keep paying big money for free agents who have developed on other teams.



add WR and QB to that list... Aikman has been here since 89! this team has not drafted and developed a QB since!
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,004
Reaction score
37,144
arglebargle;2548750 said:
If you get two starting players out of a standard number of draft picks, you have done okay.

The 2005 draft as a whole, was not very good, and the Cowboys probably had the best choices of any team that year.

Notable here is the number of OLinemen that have not panned out. Also, for a guy who brought the term 'pet cats' to the Cowboys, Parcells sure ended up with a lot of 'em.

That's why I want us to use all of our picks this year instead of bundling them. Two of the greatest drafts in NFL history were made by the early 1990s Cowboys, and one of the contributing factors was the number of draft picks Dallas used.

Take more shots and you improve your chances of scoring.
 

Thick 'N Hearty

Active Member
Messages
2,359
Reaction score
0
gimmesix;2549529 said:
That's why I want us to use all of our picks this year instead of bundling them. Two of the greatest drafts in NFL history were made by the early 1990s Cowboys, and one of the contributing factors was the number of draft picks Dallas used.

Take more shots and you improve your chances of scoring.

Or your inaccuracy to not be able to hit the mark. But, I see where you're coming from. It's like basketball. You can't make a lot of points by shooting every once in awhile.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
gimmesix;2549529 said:
That's why I want us to use all of our picks this year instead of bundling them. Two of the greatest drafts in NFL history were made by the early 1990s Cowboys, and one of the contributing factors was the number of draft picks Dallas used.

Take more shots and you improve your chances of scoring.

I think I've pointed this out like a billion times before but here goes again.

One of the major reasons why the drafts in those years were so good was that we were drafting for a defensive system that few teams were using -- we were able to get a bunch of undersized guys who had great talent but fell b/c they were too small for most defensive systems.

Of course, people's perceptions of those drafts are a bit overblown. If we were so damn good at talent evaluation how did we take James Richards before Eric Williams? How did we trade Steve Wisniewski away?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,830
Reaction score
112,718
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Arch Stanton;2548782 said:
Is it any wonder why there is no quality OLine depth?

Insert trade for Holland and signings of Kozier, Columbo and Bigg.

We cannot draft an OLineman for.......
More than just OL.........

The last decent starting WR we have drafted was Alvin Harper in 1991.
 

masomenos

Less is more
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
33
Wow, 2004 was a bad draft.

Even after trading down, our first 5 picks could have been.

S Bob Sanders
DT/DE Darnell Dockett
OG Sean Locklear
DE/OLB Jared Allen
RB Michael Turner

Oh, hindsight.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
masomenos85;2549761 said:
Wow, 2004 was a bad draft.

Even after trading down, our first 5 picks could have been.

S Bob Sanders
DT/DE Darnell Dockett
OG Sean Locklear
DE/OLB Jared Allen
RB Michael Turner

Oh, hindsight.

you can't judge a draft like that.

but I can honestly say that, although I was thrilled with the Julius Jones pick, I was screaming for us to get Turner, who I expected to go much higher. I hate you Sean Ryan
 

masomenos

Less is more
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
33
AbeBeta;2549801 said:
you can't judge a draft like that.

but I can honestly say that, although I was thrilled with the Julius Jones pick, I was screaming for us to get Turner, who I expected to go much higher. I hate you Sean Ryan

Oh, I'm not judging the draft based on that. I was just saying what could have been.
 

parchy

Active Member
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
3
Honestly, our percentage on players that hit vs. players that missed since '03 is probably either at or above the league average. You're really just hoping two, maybe three of your picks in a given year are going to be around contributing by the end of their rookie contracts. Parcells reformed some of Jerry's bad draft habits and Wade's got a decent enough staff around him to help somewhat in that regard. Let us not forget how badly a lot of folks thought Jerry missed on Felix over Mendenhall. They both missed the season but I don't think anybody would re-do that.

I can guarantee though that we won't be having any more '03 or '05 drafts under current management without a personnel guy in here to check Jerry's ridiculous ideas. Wade and his lackeys sure as hell ain't it.
 

jeffm

New Member
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
masomenos85;2549825 said:
Oh, I'm not judging the draft based on that. I was just saying what could have been.

You'd think with the guys we drafted in the past 5 years we'd at least make it to one NFC Championship game, with a SuperBowl not being out of the question.......gotta be the coaching
 

parchy

Active Member
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
3
And the NFL Draft involves waaay more educated guessing than people give credit for. The Giants last few drafts are a prime example.
 

BoysFanInAustin

Active Member
Messages
380
Reaction score
141
parchy;2549829 said:
Honestly, our percentage on players that hit vs. players that missed since '03 is probably either at or above the league average. You're really just hoping two, maybe three of your picks in a given year are going to be around contributing by the end of their rookie contracts. Parcells reformed some of Jerry's bad draft habits and Wade's got a decent enough staff around him to help somewhat in that regard. Let us not forget how badly a lot of folks thought Jerry missed on Felix over Mendenhall. They both missed the season but I don't think anybody would re-do that.

I can guarantee though that we won't be having any more '03 or '05 drafts under current management without a personnel guy in here to check Jerry's ridiculous ideas. Wade and his lackeys sure as hell ain't it.

What the heck? We had an awesome draft in 2008.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
League average is to hit on about 1/3 of your picks.
A draft like 2005 comes along every 20-30 years. its arguable that the 75 dirty dozen is the only comparable one in team history.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,830
Reaction score
112,718
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
parchy;2549829 said:
I can guarantee though that we won't be having any more '03 or '05 drafts under current management without a personnel guy in here to check Jerry's ridiculous ideas. Wade and his lackeys sure as hell ain't it.
Perhaps Jerry has learned that listening and trusting the scouts is a good thing.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
I think our drafts the past several years have been pretty damn good, with the exception of 2004 and 2006, and those were poor due to offensive linemen not panning out and Parcell's personal first round pick in Bobby Carpenter. The other drafts have been extremely productive and have produced many starters. Pretty much the same as almost every other team in the league. Everyone has hits and misses. It's just the name of the game. Our biggest problem, as everyone knows, is evaluating and drafting good OL. We suck there. No news here.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
arglebargle;2548750 said:
If you get two starting players out of a standard number of draft picks, you have done okay.

The 2005 draft as a whole, was not very good, and the Cowboys probably had the best choices of any team that year.

Notable here is the number of OLinemen that have not panned out. Also, for a guy who brought the term 'pet cats' to the Cowboys, Parcells sure ended up with a lot of 'em.

WHAT?????? Our 2005 draft was GREAT. Five starters in Ware, Spears, Canty, Ratliff, and Barber. We also got Burnett. What do you want, 7 Hall of Famers in one draft? That was a great draft.
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
One more thing about the drafts - have we broken our long-standing 2nd round jinx? We bypassed it altogether in 2007 and Bennett looks like he is going to be an okay 2nd rounder.

Come to think of it, Burnett was actually pretty good this year in the nickel, too. Furthermore, Fasano's production with the Jets was reasonable for a 2nd round TE. That makes about 4 years with reasonable (not exceptional) 2nd round picks after a long string of letdowns.
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
Star4Ever;2549941 said:
WHAT?????? Our 2005 draft was GREAT. Five starters in Ware, Spears, Canty, Ratliff, and Barber. We also got Burnett. What do you want, 7 Hall of Famers in one draft? That was a great draft.

Not just 5 starters, but 3 guys who have gone to the Pro Bowl and one guy who could be DPOTY.
 
Top