News: Cowboys Free Agency: Next Moves In 'Cap Hell'

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,030
Reaction score
22,617
Cowboys Free Agency: Next Moves In 'Cap Hell'
1455864.jpg

KD Drummond + FishCowboysHQ.com
http://dal.scout.com/story/1521852-cowboys-free-agency-next-moves-in-cap-hell?s=112





There is no such thing as Cowboys Cap Hell. There is, rather, the now-official tagging of Dez, the room-opening options involving Romo, and the fluidity that creates for Dallas the ability to shop for as much as $46.5 million worth of free-agency help.



Salary Cap Hell

As our astute readers know, there is no such thing as Salary Cap Hell. The salary cap is dynamic, not static. It fluctuates from year to year, moving the ceiling up as the league brings in more and more revenue. It is entirely possible, and likely, that each year’s cap rises above and beyond the projected increases, because the NFL annually brings in more money beyond anyone's wildest dreams. In addition and possibly more importantly, the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that is agreed to by the NFL and the NFL Player’s Association (NFLPA) allows for multiple contract mechanisms that allow teams to play “funny money” with the amount of cap space used on each deal. Teams can very easily spend ‘X’ amount of dollars on a player one year, yet have up to five years to actually “be charged” for that amount.

Along with the fluctuation and fluidity comes the business steps towards managing a roster and a cap. A major step is, of course, now official: Dez Bryant has been given the franchise tag by the Dallas Cowboys.

1475998.jpg


Cowboys COO Stephen Jones tells us: "We just don't want to lose his rights. We think Dez is a unique player and certainly a big part of what we do in terms of what we've done, our success, and certainly going forward. We've got a long period of time where we can work, continue to work on doing something long term for Dez."

Agent Tom Condon tells SiriusXM: "Dez understands this is business. We're going to try to figure something out here and work with Jerry and Stephen and get something done.''

For more insight into the inner workings of the cap, make sure you check out our October series on the Cowboys 2015 Salary Cap Overview, Part I. That article discussed carrying over cap space from one year to the next, projected salary for the next year and the projected cap for next year (new numbers lock that in at $143.28 million).

A couple of weeks ago, Dallas had $8.5 million in cap space going into free agency; how would the Cowboys afford to bring back Dez and the majority of those 23 free agents? Even more worrisome, how is Dallas going to be able to improve?

Simple … Salary Cap Math.

Cap Math

Salary-Cap Math is the use of reallocation to pay a player the exact same amount that is agreed upon for his base salary. The most common method, Restructure Bonus, is when base salary for a year is converted to bonus money. That money is normally then paid immediately to the player instead of over the 17-week regular season (unless an agreement is made for the bonus to be spread out as well). It allows the same “salary” to hit multiple years of the team’s cap instead of just one. If a team converts $10 mil of base salary into a bonus (and that player has a minimum of five years remaining on his deal) then that $10 million hit is now only a $2-million hit. It just adds a $2 million hit to the cap in each of the next four years as well.

Salary-Cap Math also includes being able to wipe out potential cap charges for players that are not living up to their part of the contract. While it sucks for the player, the majority of an NFL contract is not guaranteed. At any time, a team can release a player and they are no longer responsible for any non-guaranteed money.

It is in these two methodologies where Dallas will once again prove that Cap Hell is a simply a media narrative used to fill up space and generate website clicks. The truth? Dallas can afford Dez AND DeMarco AND ... well, anybody.

Examples of cap-savings options?

*Dez will be one, if Dallas can do its "Cowboys For Life'' deal with him before March 10 (to help shopping) or before July 15 (to help simply spread impact). That $12.8-mil hit can suddenly be a $5.4-mil hit for 2015, if the Cowboys do Dez' new deal as we outline here.

*Henry Melton is already another. The Cowboys had a built-in three-year option that kicked in if they wanted to, but it would've cost them $9 mil in 2015 for Melton's services. So, Melton is gone, option not picked up. Dallas will only eat $750,000 in dead money, meaning the move saves them another $8.5 mil off their projected cap hit.

1488480.jpg


*Cole Beasley. Now, Melton is a big one. Beasley is a small one. (Pun intended.) Dallas was working to get past just giving him a second-round tender (counting $2.356 mil) to instead give him a fair, affordable longer-team deal, thus spreading out the impact. This four-year deal, Beasley himself tells us, is done. See the details here, but understand the cap-related impact now: Instead of Beasley counting against the 2015 cap to the tune of $2.356 mil, his cap number will be $1.66 mil ... so Dallas keeps a player it values and saves $800,000 against the cap.

*Brandon Carr is a biggie. Carr’s base salary of $8 mil is barely above the final two years of prorated signing bonus ($7.4 mil) in 2016 and 2017. When combined with the $4.7 mil of prorated bonus in 2015, it’s a wash to outright release the underperforming corner. As a June 1st cut, moving on from Carr would have it’s benefits. Dallas would get $8 mil in 2015 cap space to work with. The downside, though, is that $7.4 million would now be 2016 dead money ... and your roster would be short a cornerback, which is why **click-bait**.com is told Dallas is presently negotiating with agent Ben Dogra to find a way to un-do/re-do Carr in order to retain him.

*Tyron Smith is a pre-designed trigger waiting to be flipped. Smith signed a huge extension in 2014, but those in the know think that Dallas did well for itself in the construction of the deal. Smith’s “bargain” signing bonus of $10 million is allocated over five years at just $2 mil per year. Smith's 2015 base salary is a little over $11 mil, with each of the next six years being at just $10 mil in base salary. Restructuring Smith to the league-minimum could net Dallas another $8 million in cap space.

*Tony Romo ... and there are all sorts of options here. They might not hesitate to push off a good chunk of his $27.8-mil 2015 cap hit if they want to go shopping for big fish. A restructure that moves $16 mil from base salary to signing bonus (his base would still have to be league-minimum, roughly $1 mil) prorated over five years, would give the Cowboys an additional $12.8 million of cap space.

0204.jpg


Remember, this doesn't escape you from responsibility, it just moves it, as the team would still be on hook for $32 million of unamortized bonus over the 2016-2019 seasons.

It is important at this point to remember, Dallas doesn’t HAVE to restructure any or all of these deals, and if they choose to, don’t always have to restructure a base salary down to the league-minimum for the year. These are simply various options they have should they choose to create additional cap room for other signings. This is part of "the business,'' as Condon says, as it relates to Dez ... and literally hundreds of other options that could create as much as $46.5 million in cap room ... thus allowing the Cowboys themselves -- though we bet they are more "second-wave'' bidders than first-wave -- to dream as big as Cowboys fans always do.

Onside Kicks

*So Dez gets the non-exclusive franchise tag, Stephen Jones tells **click-bait**.com. That puts Dallas at $129 million of used cap space ... plus Dez' $12.8 mil hold ... which equals $141.8 million. But the cap is at $143.28 million? Yes. Now add the $5 million carryover from 2014 (that essentially makes Dallas' cap $148 mil) ... and there was about $7 mil of room before the Beasley deal.

*We mock-draft all seven rounds for the Cowboys ... and come up with some doozies.

*Cowboys fans get the Premium goods: What the Cowboys say privately about Greg Hardy. (Hint: Maybe the more you look, the less you like.)

demarco-murray-dez-bryant-nfl-new-orleans-saints-dallas-cowboys3.jpg


*In an exclusive with Stephen Jones, **click-bait**.com learns the team's "shop-and-drop'' plans with DeMarco Murray. And as you ponder the McCoy-to-Bills deal (Philly seeing one of the two best runners in football as too expensive and expendable) prepare yourself for buzz about the single best runner in football, Adrian Peterson -- and how the market is too flooded with "good'' to overpay for "good.''
 

WPBCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,265
Reaction score
6,532
Im sure some of the Zone cap experts here will still tell us we cant of this and we cant do that because of cap mismanagement.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Im sure some of the Zone cap experts here will still tell us we cant of this and we cant do that because of cap mismanagement.

People against restructuring Romo worry about if he retires next year and they have to take a 30m cap hit.

Well they are intentionally choosing to take a 27m cap hit this year, when we need to sign plenty of players.

And if Romo retires they can split the remaining dead money over 2 years and his large base salaries will be gone.

Next year his salary is only 8.5m and there will only be 4 years left to prorate, not 5.
 

endersdragon

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,109
Reaction score
4,801
We aren't in cap hell, still I would rather not get into a bidding war that results in us overpaying for anyone like we did with Carr.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,870
Reaction score
11,569
Oh, so our credit cards have no limit and we never have to pay them back? Awesome!

It's such an awesome plan. So awesome it makes it a complete mystery why the rest of the league does it far less.
 
Last edited:

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901
It's such an awesome plan. So awesome it makes it a complete mystery why the rest of the league does it far less.

Just because its not broadcast all over espn and the other media doesn't mean it doesn't happen on every other team and frequently at that. You can choose to believe the Cowboys are the only team stupid enough to use this method or question its validity all you want. The reality is nearly every team restructures contracts to maneuver the cap to their needs and more often than not its with bigger contracts. This applies to all manner of teams from the perennial contenders to the perennial pretenders. I'll choose to believe the billionaire owners and the account specialists they have run the cap are better equipped to manage a salary cap than fans.

I keep saying it, but bad extensions, bad free agent signings and players getting injured early in a contract are what leads to most problems with the cap. Not using smart business principles like restructuring contacts when needed to add talent or keep talent on a roster.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Just because its not broadcast all over espn and the other media doesn't mean it doesn't happen on every other team and frequently at that. You can choose to believe the Cowboys are the only team stupid enough to use this method or question its validity all you want. The reality is nearly every team restructures contracts to maneuver the cap to their needs and more often than not its with bigger contracts. This applies to all manner of teams from the perennial contenders to the perennial pretenders. I'll choose to believe the billionaire owners and the account specialists they have run the cap are better equipped to manage a salary cap than fans.

I keep saying it, but bad extensions, bad free agent signings and players getting injured early in a contract are what leads to most problems with the cap. Not using smart business principles like restructuring contacts when needed to add talent or keep talent on a roster.

If no one else is doing it, that should be even more of a reason to do so. It will give us that much more of an advantage if we are spending 30-40m more per year than everyone else.

It is so frustrating to see so many fans that think straight line accounting is the better method because it is safer. Intentionally choosing not to spend money is just plain stupid.

Salary caps do not kill teams, bad GMs do.
 

endersdragon

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,109
Reaction score
4,801
If no one else is doing it, that should be even more of a reason to do so. It will give us that much more of an advantage if we are spending 30-40m more per year than everyone else.

It is so frustrating to see so many fans that think straight line accounting is the better method because it is safer. Intentionally choosing not to spend money is just plain stupid.

Salary caps do not kill teams, bad GMs do.

Bad GMs don't kill teams, bad GMs making bad contracts do. If we can get Hardy (since that seems to be who everyone wants) for his real market value (taking into account the fact that he has more red flags than a game of minesweeper) good, but if we are going to get caught in a bidding war for him, and end up overpaying him, I would much rather go for a cheaper guy who we don't have to get in a bidding war to get.
 

Fredd

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
2,238
cap, schmap.....just fill the roster in with guys that can play and are hungry...sprinkle in a game-changer here and there....
 

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,673
Reaction score
5,316
Cap hell cap hell cap hell. Havent these 2 words not been stressed enough ?

Everytime someone lacks a story he makes one up by stressing meaningless things again.


The cap was not installed to bring teams in situations were they cant be under the limit. It works differently.

The cap was installed to make non competitive teams (because of the lack of money) competitive again. And competivness works in comparison to something. It is not a absolute thing, it is relative.

And relativly viewed Dallas was in "cap hell" the last few years. Again: Not because they werent able to get under the cap limit. They were in "cap hell" because they werent able to be competitive against other teams. Other teams in comparison had much more money to spend. And that IS what counts. It is not the money you are able to spend it is about the money you can spend more compared to others.

Some may bring up the argument that we had enough money after the Draft with June 1st cuts etc. But it's the beginning of FA that counts. Not some garbage time after all is said and done already.

2015 is the first year Dallas is in competition to other teams. Its not like we can compete with everybody, but we are in much better shape then in recent years.

I like the way this FO works now. After they pulled JJ and his son "Stupid" Jones aside we finally see some light at the end of the tunnel.
 
Last edited:

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
Cap hell cap hell cap hell. Havent these 2 words not been stressed enough ?

Everytime someone lacks a story he makes one up by stressing meaningless things again.


The cap was not installed to bring teams in situations were they cant be under the limit. It works differently.

The cap was installed to make non competitive teams (because of the lack of money) competitive again. And competivness works in comparison to something. It is not a absolute thing, it is relative.

And relativly viewed Dallas was in "cap hell" the last few years. Again: Not because they werent able to get under the cap limit. They were in "cap hell" because they werent able to be competitive against other teams. Other teams in comparison had much more money to spend. And that IS what counts. It is not the money you are able to spend it is about the money you can spend more compared to others.

Some may bring up the argument that we had enough money after the Draft with June 1st cuts etc. But it's the beginning of FA that counts. Not some garbage time after all is said and done already.

2015 is the first year Dallas is in competition to other teams. Its not like we can compete with everybody, but we are in much better shape then in recent years.

I like the way this FO works now. After they pulled JJ and his son "Stupid" Jones aside we finally see some light at the end of the tunnel.

Everyone keeps taking about "Cap Hell" which we aren't. We can restructure a few guys and come up with some millions to spend if we find someone
cheap but, the Cowboys are going to be frugal giving out contracts and other than their own "FA" are not going to be pursuing any big name high dollar
players. I think it doubtful if you will even see them bring in an outside player during the 1st 7-10 days of FA. They have already said that they
are going to try and close deals with Dez and DeMarco first before they pursue other players. If there's another Mincey out there in week 3 of FA who
wants to sign a 1-2 yr deal then they will pursue it. Steven is going to protect Jerry from himself and keep the Cowboys OUT of Cap Hell.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
Cap 'Hell' at its height....was last year. We had to release Ware and Hatcher while eating numerous dead money salaries. We had our best season in years.

Let's go shopping for a trophy or two.
 

cowboyvic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,817
Reaction score
735
We aren't in cap hell, still I would rather not get into a bidding war that results in us overpaying for anyone like we did with Carr.

Just because Jerry and Stephen screwed up with Carr.should not keep being used as an excuse not to go after the best free agents. guys like Suh and Hardy.can't keep sitting back every year letting the best players go else where, and picking up scrubs. Jerry needs to spend some money on a top player or two this year, that may put his team over the top. can't keep waiting. QB turns 35 this year.
 
Last edited:

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
Just because Jerry and Stephen screwed up with Carr.should not keep being used as an excuse not to go after the best free agents. guys like Suh and Hardy.can't keep sitting back every year letting the best players go else where, and picking up scrubs. Jerry needs to spend some money on a top player or two this year, that may put his team over the top. can't keep waiting. QB turns 35 this year.

Sorry to bust your bubble but, Jerry and Stephen have both said they are not going to follow your prescription. Cowboys FO think
they can find adequate players beneath the top guys so no Suh or Hardy will be coming to a theatre near you this year.
 
Messages
10,109
Reaction score
7,327
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Just because Jerry and Stephen screwed up with Carr.should not keep being used as an excuse not to go after the best free agents. guys like Suh and Hardy.can't keep sitting back every year letting the best players go else where, and picking up scrubs. Jerry needs to spend some money on a top player or two this year, that may put his team over the top. can't keep waiting. QB turns 35 this year.

Yes, there is a time and a place to go FA and this is it. Premium positions like pass rushing DE/DT can be justifiably high dollar acquisitions if the player is worthy. I think Hardy is worthy as are a couple of the DT free agents,,, we should get at least one.
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
Yes, there is a time and a place to go FA and this is it. Premium positions like pass rushing DE/DT can be justifiably high dollar acquisitions if the player is worthy. I think Hardy is worthy as are a couple of the DT free agents,,, we should get at least one.

I just can't see why everyone has a bee in the bonnet for Hardy since he is in the Commish's doghouse and likely
to get game suspensions this year. Geez, there are 4 or 5 other candidates out there that don't have his baggage
and likely roid induced anger issues.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Middle of the road upgrades and a good draft along with keeping most if not all of our guys and we can still be a very competitive force..
 

Longboysfan

hipfake08
Messages
13,316
Reaction score
5,797
Im sure some of the Zone cap experts here will still tell us we cant of this and we cant do that because of cap mismanagement.

Not Can't. But should not go into the deep end.


Remember, this doesn't escape you from responsibility, it just moves it, as the team would still be on hook for $32 million of unamortized bonus over the 2016-2019 seasons.
 
Top