Cowboys have the No. 1 rushing offense in the entire NFL

cml750

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
3,964
If this fantasy helps you to feel better about the current state of the team, then I'm all for it. But again, we were very effective last season in terms of points/offensive series. You can't really expect the offense to do more than be productive when it has the ball. And we were among the worst in the league in defense. To whatever extend we can give Scott Linehan credit for fixing those things, I'll all for it.

Idgit, I think you are the one in fantasy land but thank you for your time and dedication to this site. I sent you a PM stating the same my friend. Although I disagree with you OFTEN, you are ALWAYS on here to defend yourself. That takes a lot of time and dedication my friend, and I want to give you full credit for it!!!!!
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,677
Reaction score
18,033
Take a bow, Murray. Bravo, DeMarcus.
Brava to Garrett for emphasizing the running game, brava!
 

Jstopper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,488
Reaction score
8,007
My boy Murray is making a push for MVP this year. Looks like he has put the injury bug behind him as well.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Idgit, I think you are the one in fantasy land but thank you for your time and dedication to this site. I sent you a PM stating the same my friend. Although I disagree with you OFTEN, you are ALWAYS on here to defend yourself. That takes a lot of time and dedication my friend, and I want to give you full credit for it!!!!!

Group hug time. Everybody come and get some. Don't leave me and cml750 sitting here looking like idiots.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
The problem was Garrett running the offense. Thankfully Jerry has FINALLY realized that problem and put Linehan completely in charge of offense. If we are to be stuck with an incompetent idiot like Garrett than this is the best solution we can hope far. Take away as much control as possible until he is just a figurehead clapping on the sidelines and roll with it. I give Jerry credit so far this season that it is working. Less Garrettt = Improved team.

Garrett did not take back playcalling until the end of the season. As good as Callahan was with the offensive line this year he was pretty bad as a OC up until Garrett took back playcalling. The offensive in and of its self is pretty much the same offense as last year we just have someone using more variety.
 

cml750

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
3,964
Garrett did not take back playcalling until the end of the season. As good as Callahan was with the offensive line this year he was pretty bad as a OC up until Garrett took back playcalling. The offensive in and of its self is pretty much the same offense as last year we just have someone using more variety.

[http://cowboysblog.***BANNED-URL***...ms-offensive-coordinator-in-2013.html//QUOTE]

INDIANAPOLIS — Bill Callahan was the offensive coordinator in name only last season, Jerry Jones said Sunday. Head coach Jason Garrett really had that role, the Cowboys owner explained.

“Jason was really your coordinator last year,” Garrett said. “That’s a fact. That was one of the issues. It was unfair to Bill.”

Callahan was given the play-calling duty last off-season. But the mechanics of the relaying process between Callahan and quarterback Tony Romo were modified during the team’s bye week last November. Starting Nov. 24, in a victory over the New York Giants, quarterbacks coach Wade Wilson was moved from the sideline to the booth to sit alongside Callahan. Garrett then took over Wilson’s headset and would transfer Callahan’s called play to Romo via the communication device in the quarterback’s helmet.

“All of it was manifested by the fact that it was very difficult for Jason to get out of that role,” Jones said of Garrett, who called plays from 2007 to 2012. “We laugh, but there is a difference when you’re sitting in the room and as the coach and you say, ‘hey, wait a minute, y’all put some salt and pepper in there’ than after it has already been cooked and you’re tasting it outside the room and it might need a little salt and pepper. It’s a big difference.’”

Jones said Garrett had “the last pencil down” on an offense that produced its fewest yards per game than since 2005.

“That wasn’t the plan,” Jones said. “Going into training camp, going into OTAs, going into that period of the time, the plan was for Bill to ultimately be the play-caller with Romo executing it…I think calling the plays – I would agree with [Garrett] right there – that that was the last pencil down. Call it the last pencil down. Who has got the last pencil down? I think Jason had the last pencil down all the way through.”

But Garrett didn’t have a headset the first 10 games of the season. So who was really calling the plays throughout 2013?
 

cml750

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
3,964
As good as Callahan was with the offensive line this year he was pretty bad as a OC up until Garrett took back playcalling. The offensive in and of its self is pretty much the same offense as last year we just have someone using more variety.**

Sorry to disappoint you but please see the quote above. Do not eat all of the cheese until you understand where the cheese comes from. Again less Garrett = better offense. This is on evidence this entire season.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770

But Garrett didn’t have a headset the first 10 games of the season. So who was really calling the plays throughout 2013?

I think some of this is Jerry spin, some maybe true.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Garrett did not take back playcalling until the end of the season. As good as Callahan was with the offensive line this year he was pretty bad as a OC up until Garrett took back playcalling. The offensive in and of its self is pretty much the same offense as last year we just have someone using more variety.

There's so much that changes from season to season in the NFL. It really is a different stew each and every year. As much as we want to try to isolate what ingredients make it different, it's really tough to do.
Just look at the defense. Take last year's awful play, remove Lee, Hatcher, and Ware. Add Melton and Marinelli. Stir. What do you get? Something completely different from what we fielded last year. Relative effectiveness aside, it's a completely different unit out there. This is why players and coaches are so fond of saying 'every year is different.'
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
There's so much that changes from season to season in the NFL. It really is a different stew each and every year. As much as we want to try to isolate what ingredients make it different, it's really tough to do.
Just look at the defense. Take last year's awful play, remove Lee, Hatcher, and Ware. Add Melton and Marinelli. Stir. What do you get? Something completely different from what we fielded last year. Relative effectiveness aside, it's a completely different unit out there. This is why players and coaches are so fond of saying 'every year is different.'

I get that the interior of that line was pretty green, we started a 2nd year guy that had little experience, a rook, and guy that this year got beat out by the 2nd year guy from last year. The overall skill level of the OL is better at this point than it was last year. The defense I am not too worried about due to the law of averages and it is very hard to be as bad as you were the year before considering the experience in the scheme and the overall learning curve not being as steep.
 

cml750

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
3,964
There's so much that changes from season to season in the NFL. It really is a different stew each and every year. As much as we want to try to isolate what ingredients make it different, it's really tough to do.
Just look at the defense. Take last year's awful play, remove Lee, Hatcher, and Ware. Add Melton and Marinelli. Stir. What do you get? Something completely different from what we fielded last year. Relative effectiveness aside, it's a completely different unit out there. This is why players and coaches are so fond of saying 'every year is different.'

It certainly helps the the defense when the OC does not abandon the run!!!
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It certainly helps the the defense when the OC does not abandon the run!!!

Does it? I know it helps when the offense extends drives. Does the defense care if the drives get extended via passing plays instead of rushing plays? Or are they just happy we move the chains and eventually score? And does it really matter if the offense moves the ball and scores, anyway?

Because last season, we were pretty effective offensively relative to the rest of the league when our offense had the ball, too.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I get that the interior of that line was pretty green, we started a 2nd year guy that had little experience, a rook, and guy that this year got beat out by the 2nd year guy from last year. The overall skill level of the OL is better at this point than it was last year. The defense I am not too worried about due to the law of averages and it is very hard to be as bad as you were the year before considering the experience in the scheme and the overall learning curve not being as steep.

I was just bringing up the defense as a good example of how different production can be when the ingredients don't even change for the better. The only point is that everything changes in the NFL, every season. Look no farther than the outcomes of the Saints games to see what a difference a year can make.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I was just bringing up the defense as a good example of how different production can be when the ingredients don't even change for the better. The only point is that everything changes in the NFL, every season. Look no farther than the outcomes of the Saints games to see what a difference a year can make.

Yes it changes but I still think a team who has the ability to run the ball consistently and be able to attack in the passing game is a lot more dangerous than a team who can only do one or the other.
Murray TD count the same as Dez. Rules change but in my view the game didn't if you can run and pass does not matter what era of football you are talking about you will be successful on the offensive side of the ball
 

cml750

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
3,964
Does it? I know it helps when the offense extends drives. Does the defense care if the drives get extended via passing plays instead of rushing plays? Or are they just happy we move the chains and eventually score? And does it really matter if the offense moves the ball and scores, anyway?

Because last season, we were pretty effective offensively relative to the rest of the league when our offense had the ball, too.

Okay, I am not invested in this argument enough( I gave you props in my PM to you and will admit I am hot unhappy enough with the team right now to look up all the stats), but if you miss a pass the clock stops where it is. If you get stuffedi n a run the clock keeps ticking up to 45 seconds.
 

50cent

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,804
Reaction score
572
You are right, but it's not only about avg. yards per carry it's the situations that the Cowboys were in. It's the trust that the coaching staff places in the line. Maybe, Garrett/Callahan should have had more trust in the line, but there is a reason they didn't. Were the reasons unfounded maybe.

Leary had knee surgery prior to the season, and you have to admit that watching Berny get pushed around or Fredbeard being a rookie had something to do with the the trust that the coaches granted that line.

Sometimes the O-line would come out and dominate the opposing D-line, but the next game the O-line was terrible. The O-line was the very definition of inconsistent.

It's a dysfunction that doesn't exist this year.

My own view and it's just mine, they O-line was an issue because of the guard play, they were not physical at the point of attack and it created problems.

By the way in the last game of the year when the Cowboys needed Murray most he averaged 2.8 yds a carry (17-48). Is it Murray's fault, absolutely not. The line play was bad, Orton was bad.

We see it different boss. I saw a philosophical abuse of passing whether up, down or tied only to blame the Oline for not being able to.close out a game by run for 1 game vs DET. I don't think they were given ample opportunity to be judged/scapegoated, especially after contributing to the success of a pro bowl RB.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,202
And yet...top 5 in terms of points/offensive series. Go figure.

The problem last season was with the defense.

The defense isn't very good this year either but i'd bet the offense has way more Time of Possession this year then we did last year.


Our offense is no longer so Romo dependent. We can actually call good plays and get teams off balance.

Playactions, screens, finding matchups... It's just night and day better from what it was.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
The defense isn't very good this year either but i'd bet the offense has way more Time of Possession this year then we did last year.


Our offense is no longer so Romo dependent. We can actually call good plays and get teams off balance.

Playactions, screens, finding matchups... It's just night and day better from what it was.

I would say defense is better than many projected. To shut down NO in the 1st half to 3 points is no easy task.
 
Top