Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,648
- Reaction score
- 102,989
True, but DT are coveted more than left guards in terms of pay.
Especially when they put up the numbers that Irving did last year in his short stint.
Keep that "short stint" in mind.
True, but DT are coveted more than left guards in terms of pay.
Especially when they put up the numbers that Irving did last year in his short stint.
He also was suspended for PEDs and had a half season long concussion.
But, that is just crazy. We can make $40M just like that!
ready, ready for another board meltdown either way. Or should I say the continued melt down.
If he does not get an offer, the usual suspects will whine he sucks, because no one else wanted him, so Jerry is dumb to pay $2.91 mil....
If he signs elsewhere, they will whine why didn't they work out a 2 year deal at least. We lost a good player
If the offer is matched or not matched, comment will go opposite of what happens.
For me personally I prefer him to stay here, even if on the one year deal, then next year I still believe he is a RFA and not an ERFA. If he signs elsewhere, then he does, I won't like it so much, but can't do anything about it. And can't blame the FO for taking this approach until he shows a bit more consistency. But it is their own fault in a way they didn't use him enough to show it.
either way is win win for us. no down side to this unless we dont use the 2nd to move better in the first.
Only reason is because he "might" be a headcase. But the talent is clearly there.
It is kind of arrogant to tell you the truth.This is disconcerting.
No one will trade a 2nd rounder for him. Hes only playing noticeable cause our Line is trash. On most Teams hes a Backup at best.
Correct.The downside is using a 2nd and completely botching it when you had a known commodity.
The downside is using a 2nd and completely botching it when you had a known commodity.
There is nothing to stop a team with extra picks in the 2nd (Cleveland, New England, Jets, Buffalo) from floating one out there.
So let's try to dissect this out.No one is going to give a second rounder for Irving, are you guys for real. Guy has issues and it is well known, as the team doesn't trust this guy.
You have no clue about the player or football, that much is obvious. Yes, he would be a backup with 7 sacks last year in 8 games...lolNo one will trade a 2nd rounder for him. Hes only playing noticeable cause our Line is trash. On most Teams hes a Backup at best.
You have no clue about the player or football, that much is obvious.
Only thing holding Irving back is suspensions and his head injury last year. That is it.
either way is win win for us. no down side to this unless we dont use the 2nd to move better in the first.