Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by DeStorm, Feb 25, 2021.
No its not. I'm in the middle with him unlike most people om here
Before we the injury I could possibly see that
People aren't that concerned with his injury.
One of the biggest tells that someone has a low football IQ is when they attribute wins to a QB (the other best/worst one is using sacks as a definitive pass rushing metric). Wins and losses are team stats. That is why people who actually want to analyze a QB use much better metrics than a metric that makes no rational sense to attribute to any one player.
The Cowboys were not 2-2 going into the Giant game. 1-3 with a win against Atlanta which was really a loss but for a once in a blue moon watermelon onside kick. Basically 0-4 going into the Giant game.
The Dak-led Cowboys were leading the winless and woeful Giants by 2 or 3 points midway in the 3rd quarter. The Cowboys were driving for a TD and were in FG range when Dak broke his leg and dislocated his ankle. The Giant game was far from being in the bag with Dak at QB.
The Cowboys did get screwed in the Ram game with a bogus offensive PI.
Wow lmao. You really have to do a deep dive to spin the narrative. Hats off to your effort.
That is what the Dakstat lovers can never see much less ever understand.
I would love to actually read and see any evidence, article from any respected source that has stated anything about Daks injury, non motivated, not from his brother... from a Doctor that hates sports preferably.
That would be non bias reporting,, something that is so rare.
One thing for sure is, no one on this forum actually knows what another team will pay Dak. Nor does anyone know what another team will or will not give up for Dak. No one will know until it happens. Everything else is just an opinion or guess. Remember the NFL teams that would be assessing Dak , are infinitely more qualified than anyone here. They also don’t have the biases against Dak that many of the posters here do. They will be making a objective professional assessment, something many people on this forum seem unable to do when it comes to Dak.
They were 1-3 with the one win being a highly unlikely onside kick. Should have been 0-4 going into the Giants game.
I have explained my position in thread multiple times on his good play in previous seasons.
So, lower my expectations? Dak has been a Cowboy for 5 seasons. Am I wrong to want to be in an NFC Championship or SB? That is my expectation.
You mean just like the other teams were dealing with?
Why not? If the objective is to win championships then a person who is demanding a higher salary when it does not warrant such a price tag isn't interested in winning. Sorry but that's not a guy you want on a team.
Wow it must be really windy, because those goal posts just moved about 20 feet.
No, you're not wrong to want that, but you're colosally wrong to say "don't pay Dak because of wins and losses." That's lazy logic.
Oh good ....... Another Dak thread.
I love this "fresh take". Thank you for the content of this thread. It is like cold water to a thirsty person in the desert.
That is one thing that has been sorely lacking on this forum. A Dak thread. My compliments. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
If prorated over 16 games, it's in Winston territory. No, that's not good and why Winston is no longer a Buccaneer.
This thread is very inspirational> I think I will go start another Dak thread. Maybe it will be about what he had for breakfast.
Did you guys know that Dak suffered an injury this past season? I had no idea!!!
Will someone please start another Dak thread? I really like them. I enjoy posting in them even MORE!!