TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 96,260
- Reaction score
- 86,766
Post of the dayReal lucky!!!![]()
Post of the dayReal lucky!!!![]()
Uhoh, you have now raised Rocky's ire, you are now a troll and an Egirls fan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not disputing your post but it seems the only reason we could point to the fact that the Cowboys would not have a chance without Dak is the same reason we could point to the Cowboys only having a chance because of Romo...
We consistently, year after year do not have a defense that can hold teams to under 20 points. Here and there we have some sparks of a defense but then it folds when it counts. Most of the time they have just been bad!!
But isn't he kind of right?Yeah I've tried to give that poster every chance to have reasonable discussions, but hes shown to be the ultimate troll. Starting a bait thread like this without replying to anything pretty much shows the intention behind it.
In what way?But isn't he kind of right?
In the midst of his incessant attacks and insults and miserable posts and threads, it doesn't matter. You can't act as he does and get any credence whatsoever. Or respect. When you are constantly disrespecful to others, that is what you will get in return.But isn't he kind of right?
Absolutely.. First of all the Cowboys have not contended for anything and secondly there is no one player who is "the only reason" for anything. Football is the ultimate team game and the QB is far and away the most important player on the team. But no, no player ever won or lost a game all by his lonesome so I pretty much reject that entire premise.In what way?
In that the cowboys have failed to field a complete team over the last decade? Sure I’d buy into that with maybe one exception where this team was really really good.
In that Dak has been the only reason the cowboys have contended over the last decade? Nope, that’s a joke.
8-3 playoff record with 8TDs and 3 INTs with a 93.5 playoff QBR and played a perfect Divisional game that was taken from him on a play that today is a TD.So with Romo it was everybody else who messed up. But with Dak, it is Dak choking?
And like I said lots of assumptions on your part, too many if, then, else's. You are a Romosexual and will defend him to no end, as far as analyzing play by play to blame someone else.
2-4 in playoffs.
Don, it's pretty simple they hate Romo and hope and pray that dak can do better so they can throw off on him. smh..8-3 playoff record with 8TDs and 3 INTs with a 93.5 playoff QBR and played a perfect Divisional game that was taken from him on a play that today is a TD.
Lastly that “choker” led the league in comebacks and clutch rating at the time of his retirement.
I mean how come I know all this and you don’t - especially if you passive aggressively invite excuses. It’s a bad look.
Anyhow - Doesn’t matter everybody’s been through the Romo wars and most get it - some still don’t but at least you know more today than you did yesterday.
Wait. You drunk? Who is 8-3 in playoffs? When did that happen.8-3 playoff record with 8TDs and 3 INTs with a 93.5 playoff QBR and played a perfect Divisional game that was taken from him on a play that today is a TD.
Lastly that “choker” led the league in comebacks and clutch rating at the time of his retirement.
I mean how come I know all this and you don’t - especially if you passive aggressively invite excuses. It’s a bad look.
Anyhow - Doesn’t matter everybody’s been through the Romo wars and most get it - some still don’t but at least you know more today than you did yesterday.
In your opinion. Instead of insulting me, why do you think the team has had an 80-51-1 record since Dak’s been the starter? Good defense? Great WR’s? They had a great RB in Zeke but not much else. So again, instead of insults, tell us how they accomplished that record.In what way?
In that the cowboys have failed to field a complete team over the last decade? Sure I’d buy into that with maybe one exception where this team was really really good.
In that Dak has been the only reason the cowboys have contended over the last decade? Nope, that’s a joke.
2-4 playoff record - my bad. It was 8-3 TDS to INTS.Wait. You drunk? Who is 8-3 in playoffs? When did that happen.
And I think you need to go speak with the Hate Dak cult members. Perhaps the board of directors. Because all I hear is playoff record playoff record playoff record...
Next time ask their permission to diss playoff record. Fact is Romo.was 2-4 in the playoffs. And fumbled the ball in Seattle for a simple kick hold.
Sorry to inform you...but you will never ever know more than I do. Not even close..
Your attempt to play victim is pretty funny but I’ll give it a quick try to at least hit the easy points….In your opinion. Instead of insulting me, why do you think the team has had an 80-51-1 record since Dak’s been the starter? Good defense? Great WR’s? They had a great RB in Zeke but not much else. So again, instead of insults, tell us how they accomplished that record.
I don't understand why it's so hard to admit that both Dak and Romo have been let down by their teammates. Though I think we can safely state that Dak has had the worst of it.2-4 playoff record - my bad. It was 8-3 TDS to INTS.
See how easy it is to admit that you are wrong? I was wrong.
I still don't think they were "legitimate top 10 defensive units." They gave up 42 points to Green Bay. They gave up ~170 yards rushing to the 49ers in the 2021 meeting. Those things do not happen to "legitimate top 10" defenses. I think most would agree that they were somewhat fraudulent in that they needed the offense to stake them to a lead so they could rush the passer and force turnovers. When the game didn't go that way they generally didn't hold up.Your attempt to play victim is pretty funny but I’ll give it a quick try to at least hit the easy points….
1) the recent 12 win seasons featured legitimate top 10 defensive units.
2) not great WRs early in daks career but has had plus players such as cooper/gallup (pre injury)/lamb/ now Pickens.
3) got the prime years of 2 ( maybe 1.5 due to injuries) future HOF OL players
Now id love to hear how cooper rush won at such a high rate on such a pathetic team that gave its qb no help.
They were still statistically top 10 units those years and rock is going off of regular season data.I still don't think they were "legitimate top 10 defensive units." They gave up 42 points to Green Bay. They gave up ~170 yards rushing to the 49ers in the 2021 meeting. Those things do not happen to "legitimate top 10" defenses. I think most would agree that they were somewhat fraudulent in that they needed the offense to stake them to a lead so they could rush the passer and force turnovers. When the game didn't go that way they generally didn't hold up.
As for that last part? The answer is simple. Cooper Rush won games in 2021 and 2022 because he got to play in a small enough sampling of games that he didn't get exposed. When asked to play more than a smattering of games in 2024 he got exposed. To the tune of 3 games scoring 10 or fewer points and 20 or fewer in 5 of 8 starts. Rush is a classic backup who can steal you a couple of wins in small doses but when asked to start and allow teams to study and game plan for him he gets exposed. It's not his fault.. that's who he is.. But he passed for like 150 yards a game last season. You aint winnin a whole lot of games in the modern NFL doin that. Especially not when paired with a bottom 2 or 3 defense.
I quit reading after #1. Almost fell off my chair.Your attempt to play victim is pretty funny but I’ll give it a quick try to at least hit the easy points….
1) the recent 12 win seasons featured legitimate top 10 defensive units.
2) not great WRs early in daks career but has had plus players such as cooper/gallup (pre injury)/lamb/ now Pickens.
3) got the prime years of 2 ( maybe 1.5 due to injuries) future HOF OL players
Now id love to hear how cooper rush won at such a high rate on such a pathetic team that gave its qb no help.
And final results suck for both.2-4 playoff record - my bad. It was 8-3 TDS to INTS.
See how easy it is to admit that you are wrong? I was wrong.
