Dak leads NFL in Total QBR

TequilaCowboy said:
What happened to this QBR leading QB you all are exaggerating about last night? He should have shown his ID to the Detroit defense.

He stumbled and bumbled and crumbled, and thank Aubrey or it would have been a big goose egg in the first half. Never recovered. He had the deer in the headlights look. Is this gonna hurt his MVP chances?
Click to expand...
All lies from you as usual.
 
QBR ...

Padded stats against trash teams ,

the PROOF IS WE WONT MAKE THE PLAYOFFS . Because we dont have the wins . no matter what the garbage time stats say
 
TequilaCowboy said:
What happened to this QBR leading QB you all are exaggerating about last night? He should have shown his ID to the Detroit defense.

He stumbled and bumbled and crumbled, and thank Aubrey or it would have been a big goose egg in the first half. Never recovered. He had the deer in the headlights look. Is this gonna hurt his MVP chances?
Click to expand...
Exactly . dak always folds against good teams
 
Chasing6 said:
No you really don't. I have seen a lot of big contracts that did not have a ton of guaranteed money allowing the player to be cut and they never see the money because it was back loaded.

You can also wisely structure it with a way out by trading them. Dumb Jerry keeps giving the no trade clause to Dak. However, the Eagles have gotten out of some of their bigger contracts by trading players before they have declined and still had value.

Jerry would rather keep the player, when they are highly compensated, but are on the downside of their career.

We don't have a wise GM, that is willing to make smart decisions.

The reality is and only thing that matters is the current salary cap hit for that year. Next year's can be adjusted and or changed.
Click to expand...
No, it can’t. Not without a cap hit. Trading may lessen the cap hit. I welcome them trading Dak. You can’t look at a contract in a vacuum of one year. The Eagles get out of it because they front load. Dak’s cap hit keeps escalating. If they
Chasing6 said:
No you really don't. I have seen a lot of big contracts that did not have a ton of guaranteed money allowing the player to be cut and they never see the money because it was back loaded.

You can also wisely structure it with a way out by trading them. Dumb Jerry keeps giving the no trade clause to Dak. However, the Eagles have gotten out of some of their bigger contracts by trading players before they have declined and still had value.

Jerry would rather keep the player, when they are highly compensated, but are on the downside of their career.

We don't have a wise GM, that is willing to make smart decisions.

The reality is and only thing that matters is the current salary cap hit for that year. Next year's can be adjusted and or changed.
Click to expand...
that is simply not true. The only thing that matters is not just the current year and it can’t just be “adjusted.” The fact is Dak has the highest contract in guaranteed money and that can’t be changed unless he takes a pay cut, the money will all come due. The only option is cutting or trading which incurs huge amounts of dead money.

After all guaranteed money is paid they can cut him and save money, until then the whole contact matters. It’s why Dak would only sign 4 year contracts.
 
HMJYay said:
No, it can’t. Not without a cap hit. Trading may lessen the cap hit. I welcome them trading Dak. You can’t look at a contract in a vacuum of one year. The Eagles get out of it because they front load. Dak’s cap hit keeps escalating. If they

that is simply not true. The only thing that matters is not just the current year and it can’t just be “adjusted.” The fact is Dak has the highest contract in guaranteed money and that can’t be changed unless he takes a pay cut, the money will all come due. The only option is cutting or trading which incurs huge amounts of dead money.

After all guaranteed money is paid they can cut him and save money, until then the whole contact matters. It’s why Dak would only sign 4 year contracts.
Click to expand...
^THIS...

its a horrendous contract .
 
Bob-Lillys-War said:
^THIS...

its a horrendous contract .
Click to expand...
Yes, it’s a terrible contract. After the first terrible contract. Even with Josh Allen signing a year after him he still has the largest contract in league history. And I think even Dak homers can agree that they would prefer Josh Allen over Dak.

With all that said Jerry has given out lots of crappy contracts, it’s not his first. When a 32 year old quinten Williams is making 40 million a year as Dak’s hit is 70 million and Cee Dee’s is 35, good luck making this team better.

Jerry and Stephen are wanna be GM’s who can’t manage a cap and have no long term vision.
 
HMJYay said:
No, it can’t. Not without a cap hit. Trading may lessen the cap hit. I welcome them trading Dak. You can’t look at a contract in a vacuum of one year. The Eagles get out of it because they front load. Dak’s cap hit keeps escalating. If they

that is simply not true. The only thing that matters is not just the current year and it can’t just be “adjusted.” The fact is Dak has the highest contract in guaranteed money and that can’t be changed unless he takes a pay cut, the money will all come due. The only option is cutting or trading which incurs huge amounts of dead money.

After all guaranteed money is paid they can cut him and save money, until then the whole contact matters. It’s why Dak would only sign 4 year contracts.
Click to expand...
Watch and see what happens to Mahomes contract.
 
Wangchung83 said:
Reservations? This doesn't look like reservations, you think he's MVP before last game.lol
Post in thread 'Dak leads NFL in Total QBR'
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/dak-leads-nfl-in-total-qbr.540695/post-14559030
Click to expand...
uhh what? prior to this season i had had reservations, as this season has unfolded i've seen he was capable. not difficult to understand. also I said stafford is the mvp frontrunner just that Dak was also deservingly in the conversation. (Prior to the Detroit debacle) Need anything else spelled out for you?
 
Good for Prescott, he deserves this accolade, but this defense is hot garbage. Allowing an average of 30 points per game is embarrassing. Par for the course.
 
Shotgun Dave said:
You hush your mouth or you will vilified by the DDS crew here. He sucks, and that must be the end of it.
Click to expand...
It's not very helpful for people to do "either or". It's not "dak is a god" nor is it "dak is the whole reason we lose".

Dak himself has certainluy played well enough for us to win. But he is not above any form of criticism.

I think not scoring any TDs in the 1st half, forcing 5 FGs, and zero points in the final two possessions...is worthy of some criticism at the offense.

But our defense though....sheesh!
 
Beaker42 said:
He’s as good as our record and his playoff performances …… the rest is meaningless.
Click to expand...
Uh-huh.

So you thought Trent Dilfer was an elite QB, right?

Super Bowl champion. The rest is meaningless, right?
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
It's not very helpful for people to do "either or". It's not "dak is a god" nor is it "dak is the whole reason we lose".

Dak himself has certainluy played well enough for us to win. But he is not above any form of criticism.

I think not scoring any TDs in the 1st half, forcing 5 FGs, and zero points in the final two possessions...is worthy of some criticism at the offense.

But our defense though....sheesh!
Click to expand...
I think allowing THAT many points defensively, week after week supersedes any mistakes the offense may have made in specific drives.
 
G2 said:
I think allowing THAT many points defensively, week after week supersedes any mistakes the offense may have made in specific drives.
Click to expand...
"supercedes"? Sure. "supercede" does not mean dismiss or free pass.

I am saying the offense did them no favors. Same old story...a slow start by the offense...get behind early..then ONLY blame the (crappy) defense? Too little too late...and then zero points on the last two possessions. NOT elite.

It worked out with Philly....but most of the time...it doesn't. It puts the (already bad) defense at a strategic disadvantage.

I won't put the offense on a pedestal just because the defense sucks. They simply MUST start stronger.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
"supercedes"? Sure. "supercede" does not mean dismiss or free pass.

I am saying the offense did them no favors. Same old story...a slow start by the offense...get behind early..then ONLY blame the (crappy) defense? Too little too late...and then zero points on the last two possessions. NOT elite.

It worked out with Philly....but most of the time...it doesn't. It puts the (already bad) defense at a strategic disadvantage.

I won't put the offense on a pedestal just because the defense sucks. They simply MUST start stronger.
Click to expand...
You should try to read my post slower.
 
QBR is a bunch of nonsense promoted by ESPN because they invented it. Passer rating - all day every day.
 
I don't know how people can make a win or a loss about just the QB in most instances. No matter your stance on Dak- MVP candidate or blindfolded Chad Hutchinson- do the Cowboys win that Lions game if they had Jared Goff? Football is a team sport.

30 points was not enough to win. Too many field goals some say? Turns out 42 points would not been enough either. Yes, the Lions got 7 off a Dak pick that was George Pickens' fault, but come on.

The way this defense has played most of 2025 is non-functional. You cannot win football games needing the offense to be absolutely perfect every single drive. It's impossible and unrealistic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 161 more.
Total: 3,801 (members: 261, guests: 3,540)
Robots: 1,195

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
471,474
Messages
14,342,874
Members
23,856
Latest member
jessicajohnn
Back
Top