News: Dak ranked 50

[MountaineerCowboy]

so says a guy who wants Dak to fail so he can gloat....yeah, some kind of a cowboys fan!

You didn't say no, so that must mean yes.

You Dallas Prescotts fan you!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

You and your buddies get together and make up your minds and stop picking and choosing when to use it, k?

I think its you who needs to settle on one standard of measure and stop flip flopping as you ahve done. your posts are out there to see how you ranked/rated Dak, others on wins/losses.
come on dude...its the internet. the internet doesn't forget. so quit lying and spinning

so tell us...are wins/losses on the QB?

start your spin

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

how is watson the best loser of the bunch. he has two 4-12 seasons and 1-2 in the playoffs....

And he has the same amount of rings as your hero.

You either win or you lose.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

You didn't say no, so that must mean yes.

You Dallas Prescotts fan you!

perhaps you can respond to your own posts on my behalf, since now you seem to claim you know what I think

go ahead and spin away.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

perhaps you can respond to your own posts on my behalf, since now you seem to claim you know what I think

go ahead and spin away.

You're like Lebron fans that don't have a favorite team. They just follow Lebron wherever he goes like a lost puppy.

Dak is your Lebron.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

And he has the same amount of rings as your hero.

You either win or you lose.

exactly....that's the point of not having rings..I just followed what you said it. you said, you are comparing losers to losers....and I just pointed out that Watson is a bigger loser...so spin away on a bigger loser is better than Dak or the rest of the QBs on the list....

go ahead spin away

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Well now i can say your not a truther as you said...and very clearly you value winning....so how is Watson over Dak?

28-25.

Watson's career record as a starting quarterback is 28-25.Feb 21, 2021

and here comes another spin......

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I think one could easily say that so far Wentz's peak has been better than Dak's peak.

Wentz was going to win the MVP by a landslide in 2017. Dak has never even been in the MVP discussions.

Dak has been more consistent though, so I believe he is the better overall QB, and he would be my choice between the two. I'll take consistency over a high peak and the downfall any day (Unless you guarantee a ring, then give me the peak and downfall).

However, I do believe Wentz turns it around this year in Indy. He was broken in Philly. He couldn't shake the ghost of Foles. Wentz will never admit it, but Foles winning that Super Bowl was the worst thing that could've possible happened to him.

I'm probably the wrong guy to have that conversation with because I base all of it on team results. So to me, it's who has more skins on the wall and I don't really give a flip about stats. If my guy is winning games, making it to the playoffs and challenging for a title, I don't care how many yards he is or isn't throwing for.

I do agree, I think Wentz probably has a much better chance of finding success in Indy. The Foles thing is what it is but to me, the contract is what hurt Wentz IMO. If he had played it more like Brady did, I think he has a much better chance to be successful in Philly but those days are probably gone forever. IDK.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

You're like Lebron fans that don't have a favorite team. They just follow Lebron wherever he goes like a lost puppy.

Dak is your Lebron.

like I said, it seems like you should respond to your own posts on my behalf, since you are claiming to know me and what I think.

go ahead and spin away

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

exactly....that's the point of not having rings..I just followed what you said it. you said, you are comparing losers to losers....and I just pointed out that Watson is a bigger loser...so spin away on a bigger loser is better than Dak or the rest of the QBs on the list....

go ahead spin away

They're both losers until they win something.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

By your account neither has won a SB so they are even there....next is a 42-27 record compared to a 28-25 record so by your standard Dak is better with the higher win%...is that not correct?

oh come on...don't throw logic at this....

and here comes another scramble and spin....

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

like I said, it seems like you should respond to your own posts on my behalf, since you are claiming to know me and what I think.

go ahead and spin away

You're not very hard to figure out.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

They're both losers until they win something.

LOl. you are so funny when you avoid.

the question that was asked of you was if they are all losers why watson ahead of Dak. all statistics point to Watson being a bigger loser than Dak...your own statistical measure (I can point you to your own posts if you forgot, given how much you like to spin)..

now, you are avoiding to answer as you always do....neither has won a championship. neither has won an MVP...so who is the bigger loser and why rank Watson ahead of Dak?

go ahead spin away

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

You're not very hard to figure out.

ok, like I said, perhaps you should respond to your own posts on my behalf, since you have it all figured out...

you are avoiding.....as usual.

go ahead spin away

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

Again, somebody needs to clarify if win/loss is a QB stats or not.

I'm constantly being told that win/loss is a team stat when I bring up the 2019 and 2020 versions of the Dallas Cowboys with Dak, but then I see things like this and I become confused.

Somebody, please clarify... or are we picking and choosing when it's a team stat or when its a QB stat?

Well, it used to be that Ws would get you paid. Now, you can point out that Dak just got paid and point to that as an example of not winning but instead, getting paid for personal statistics. But I still believe you follow the money and that will eventually lead to Ws and vice versa.

 

[CowboyFrog]

Its simple really.

I ranked the losers with the other losers. Watson is just the best loser of the bunch.

If you don't win a ring, then you're a loser.

So how is Watson the best loser of the bunch when he has a middle of the "loser" pack winning %?

 

[Cowpolk]

So how is Watson the best loser of the bunch when he has a middle of the "loser" pack winning %?

Because he says so

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

So how is Watson the best loser of the bunch when he has a middle of the "loser" pack winning %?

Because I have him higher in my rankings. That's how.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Because he says so

Bingo.

 

[Cowpolk]

Bingo.

You still have not answered my question so it must mean yes