No, I have a very real and valid point, and your expectation is incredibly nonsensical. You aren't talking about major a major faux pas, you're talking about looking at words with a microscope and interpreting them yourself on behalf of the speaker.
Again, highly paid, highly educated and highly experienced speech writers who's job is to draft speeches that don't stir controversy still find criticism in little things in speeches - and that's with having the opportunity to draft the speech in advance, not respond on the spot to impromptu questions.
And what of presidential debates? Professionals at communicating to their audience who have the benefit of intense preparation for weeks in advance of the debate. They still misspeak or leave something that is unclear and open to interpretation. Your expectation that athletes handling questions immediately after an emotionally and physically draining contest should be better is nonsensical, as is your overanalyzing to push a narrative.