Dak takes the blame and refuses to blame the defense

[OmerV]

First you say that.

Then you say this.

But you're not going with your own interpretation to fit an agenda? Ok, friend. If you say so.

Your emotional responses using such weak arguments as "agenda" and ridiculous apples to oranges comparisons as well as the dramatic declarations of "emotionally and physically exhausting" do seem to indicate you're very much in touch with your feelings.

I'll agree to disagree and let this go before you start calling me an Eagles fan or to find another team.

Yeah ... those things aren't contradictory. You have shown a clear willingness to see what you want to see and latch onto the irrational.

As for me, I have no agenda. I am not trying to make Dak a bad guy or good guy. I'm just discussing realistic expectations for what people take away from these post game press conferences. They really don't contain all the revealing comments or "what he really means" moments that some like to imagine.

I would not call you an Eagles fan or suggest you find another team. You obviously have emotional ties to the Cowboys, as do most of us on this site. I just think those ties can lead to unreasonable viewpoints at times.

 

[Vtwin]

They really don't contain all the revealing comments or "what he really means" moments that some like to imagine.

Indivually, I tend to agree. Like I already said to you, in a vacuum this could be written off as an oops.

When you have ten years worth of examples to study the patterns and consistencies emerge and paint the big picture.

You have a different opinion, that's fine. No problem. When you start discounting another's opinion, which is based on the entirety of the dataset so to speak, based solely on your unproven and unsubstantiated accusations of some sort of an agenda then you have exposed yourself as having your own agenda and an emotionally driven one at that.

You can believe I'm wrong. All the better if you can back it up with something solid to point to.

You cannot write an argument off to some sort of an agenda with no other counterpoint and expect to be taken seriously.

It doesn't even make sense for a fan to have an agenda against a player on their team.

Reading the accusation of "agenda" in a post is probably the biggest red flag there is here.

I mean seriously, suggesting that Dak might say something he doesn't really mean only because it's the right thing to say in the moment is so unlikely that the suggestor just must have an "agenda"?

Come on man.

 

[Diehardblues]

It’s a core problem for 20 odd years that’s never addressed.

Of course but this year has been amplified.

 

[noshame]

We'll see how long the self-reflection lasts