Dak's pretty good

What does that have to do with progressions?
Cooper is the #1 WR, Gallup is #2 so on and so forth. There's plays designed for all but the #1 and #2 WR get the most chances. That's why they're #1 and #2.
 
Bull****. Coop has 37 catches, Gallup 13, CD 21, Sgt. Shultz 18, Zeke 23, Wilson 8, Brown 7, Bell 4 and Pollard 5. He spreads the ball all over the place based on who's open. His stats are huge because the team is always playing from behind. Get outta here with your trolling trash.
Dak has a bad habit of turning the ball over when their moving in for possible LATE GAME scores. Also, teams have such big leads that they go into prevent defenses which makes it easy for Dak to get his yards. Unfortunately for the offense they have to play near perfect football if they don't then we're not going to win which is apparent by our record. Also, is it weren't for Atlanta's gift we should be 0-4! All three phases on this team is in trouble..........
 
Dak has a bad habit of turning the ball over when their moving in for possible LATE GAME scores. Also, teams have such big leads that they go into prevent defenses which makes it easy for Dak to get his yards. Unfortunately for the offense they have to play near perfect football if they don't then we're not going to win which is apparent by our record. Also, is it weren't for Atlanta's gift we should be 0-4! All three phases on this team is in trouble..........
Also, teams have such big leads that they go into prevent defenses and also has more people in coverage. Which leads to more interceptions right? If a team is expecting a play to be a pass every time, would it be logical for there to be more turnovers? Considering the fact that we have had to come back nearly every game, I'm actually content with the amount of LOW interceptions we truly have. Because according to your prevent defenses logic, how come across the league there aren't 450+ yard passers in every team that loses in a blowout? I asked several things here.
 
Dak has a bad habit of turning the ball over when their moving in for possible LATE GAME scores. Also, teams have such big leads that they go into prevent defenses which makes it easy for Dak to get his yards. Unfortunately for the offense they have to play near perfect football if they don't then we're not going to win which is apparent by our record. Also, is it weren't for Atlanta's gift we should be 0-4! All three phases on this team is in trouble..........
This place is being overrun by ignorant posters.
 
This dude is a very, very good QB. If he's not elite, he knocking on the door. I don't agree with his haters, I mean, critics. I give you guys a little grief just to havebe some fun, but if you still think he's the problem, you've lost all credibility with me.

I hated Garrett because he sucked, I don't get why you think Dak sucks. Tell me why, and leave the money out of it, there are MANY overpaid players in pro sports.
Those of you Dak lovers, feel free to tell us why.
He’s elite. I don’t know why that’s even debatable at this point honestly.
 
Because he’s a stat padder, one-read QB with a fake good boy routine who throws everybody under the bus when things get tough and people start looking at him. And we wasted a tight Sb window with an all-pro line to cater to this bum and what could have been a generational RB, while Romo bled for the incompetence of Garrett, who is doing his magic in NY right now, and this opportunist organization, for a cheaper contract, had the audacity to bench Romo for this clown and Romo wasn’t even allowed to compete for this fragile pretender, who spoke about ‘respect’ in an interview when he didn’t get paid what he clearly wasn’t worth, this off-season..
lol - this is a clear exaggeration with an agenda. How do you "pad stats" in competitive games … how is it that defenses keep giving up so many yards and TD's if he is so clearly deficient in his reads … and who is he throwing under the bus, especially when every press conference you will find him specifically saying he has to do better himself?

You say Romo suffered under Garrett's incompetence, but in the true fashion of a person pushing an agenda, ignore the fact that Dak has played all but 4 games in his career under that same coach.

And they benched Romo for a cheaper contract … ? Whether you believe Romo was the better choice or not, this is an entirely nonsensical comment. First of all, they still had to pay Romo's contract, not only in 2016, but in 2017 as well, so benching Romo did not save money. In addition, the team had won 7-8 straight games with Dak at QB, so it's ludicrous to pretend that wasn't a factor. And then, of course, there is the fact that Romo had gotten significant injuries in 3 of the previous 4 games he had played in, so he hadn't been available most of 2 full seasons, and, again, it's ludicrous to pretend that also wasn't a factor.
 
Dak has a bad habit of turning the ball over when their moving in for possible LATE GAME scores. Also, teams have such big leads that they go into prevent defenses which makes it easy for Dak to get his yards. Unfortunately for the offense they have to play near perfect football if they don't then we're not going to win which is apparent by our record. Also, is it weren't for Atlanta's gift we should be 0-4! All three phases on this team is in trouble..........
 
Don't feed the troll. They multiply if you do.. He knows what he's posting is false he just posts it to get a rise out of people. Don't fall for it.


Right!! at first your "*** you can't be serious"
Then your "why the hell am I responding to this"

lol
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,043
Messages
14,508,865
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top