http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/2014/17/PRD/
If we're healthy, I like our chances as much as any team in the playoffs.
Oh and if anyone is interested to see how this stat has performed historically here is another link:
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/content/70-years-nfl-stats-its-all-about-the-passing-game/8213/
Yes, they took this metric from me as I created it back in 2001 and called it (QB Rating Differential aka QBRD). They didn't give me the proper credit, but that's another story.
Generally, in order to win the Super Bowl you're going to need to have a positive QBRD. IIRC, the '07 Giants where the one team to win the SB with a negative QBRD. 0 QBRD usually equates to 8 wins. 10 QBRD usually equates to about 10 wins. So at +22.5 we are doing quite well.
It used to be that you needed at least 35 sacks on defense in order to get to the Super Bowl. And you needed to finish in the top-8 in points allowed (credit AdamJT13).
Right now we have 24 sacks and we are ranked 16th in points allowed.
However, the sacks and points allowed metrics and their correlation to winning the Super Bowl have changed since 2006. My guess is the changes in the passing game have made it more difficult to sack the QB and not easy for some teams to keep points down to a minimum (too many teams are prolific offenses and you may be a team with a schedule against high profile offenses and it can skew your points allowed).
YR