Dallas should play a 4-3

[mmillman]

With RDE Ware lining up next to RDT Ratliff you would have constant blindside pressure. Canty and Johnson on the other side would benefit from all the attention you would have to pay to the other side.

 

[elcocinero]

Ahh, the weekly 4-3 Defense thread...

 

[DaBoys4Life]

:horse:

It would be nice but I don't see it happening. I would prefer Spencer at LDE...not Canty and Spears at LDT.

 

[Doomsday101]

There is nothing wrong with 4-3 and nothing wrong with playing the 3-4. It comes down to players going out and taking care of their assignments. Dallas did that very well last night and we will see if they continue to do so.

 

[Bach]

It ain't happening this year, but I see no reason we have to be married to the 3-4 once Wade is gone. We have the personnel to convert back to the 4-3 if we so desire.

 

[AbeBeta]

Yeah, except for the fact that we've drafted to a 3-4 scheme for 4 years now.

 

[Primetime42]

Not this again.

 

[Rack]

Dallas should play a 4-3

Wow. I literally want to kill someone right now.

 

[theogt]

So basically you're saying we need a defense that plays three DTs on the line (Ratliff, Canty, and Johnson), and a tweener (Ware) close to the line that can rush.

Interesting. What if, say, we put another tweener on the other side of the 3 defensive tackles. And possibly put two ILBs behind the line. This might just work.

 

[superpunk]

You may not have noticed the constant blindside pressure we applied last night. Watch for it when this game comes on NFL Replay this week.

 

[hendog]

Wow. I literally want to kill someone right now.

I might kill someone if I don't get an updated pic of the Charger Resto/Mod Project.

 

[hendog]

So basically you're saying we need a defense that plays three DTs on the line (Ratliff, Canty, and Johnson), and a tweener (Ware) close to the line that can rush.

Interesting. What if, say, we put another tweener on the other side of the 3 defensive tackles. And possibly put two ILBs behind the line. This might just work.

I saw what you did there.

 

[Rack]

So basically you're saying we need a defense that plays three DTs on the line (Ratliff, Canty, and Johnson), and a tweener (Ware) close to the line that can rush.

Interesting. What if, say, we put another tweener on the other side of the 3 defensive tackles. And possibly put two ILBs behind the line. This might just work.

Post. Of. The. Day.

I might kill someone if I don't get an updated pic of the Charger Resto/Mod Project.

:

It looks like it does in my sig, only it's in my garage now. :bang2:

 

[hendog]

Post. Of. The. Day.




:

It looks like it does in my sig, only it's in my garage now. :bang2:

You know I was just ribbing you. It seems to be hard to find time for pet projects these days. At least for me.

 

[1fisher]

Hey Rack, Why is there a battery sitting there.... is it waiting on something?

 

[Rack]

Hey Rack, Why is there a battery sitting there.... is it waiting on something?

It was waiting for my lazy arse to put it away.

 

[adbutcher]

So basically you're saying we need a defense that plays three DTs on the line (Ratliff, Canty, and Johnson), and a tweener (Ware) close to the line that can rush.

Interesting. What if, say, we put another tweener on the other side of the 3 defensive tackles. And possibly put two ILBs behind the line. This might just work.

 

[DallasEast]

For every remaining game of the 2008 season, the Cowboys will run a base 3-4 defense. No ifs, ands or buts.

What was the question again?

 

[Ichill2]

I totally agree. Greg Ellis/Ware would be more effective. The 3-4 does not fit this team. Hopefully we won't see Henry anymore at corner.

 

[1fisher]

It was waiting for my lazy arse to put it away.

:laugh2:

If it holds a charge, I can put it away for you!