THEHEREAFTER
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- 6,301
I love typos sometimes.
I love typos sometimes.
I attribute some of Jone's eye popping stats to (A) the Falcons not having a running game (B) Playing from behind.
An example of this from this past season is where the Packers jumped out to a 31-7 lead by the end of the 2nd quarter. Game was basically over at half time. Packers turtled up and played prevent. The Falcons threw all caution to the wind and throw it all around the yard and score 36 points in the 2nd half (they still lost 43-37). Julio Jones still ended up with 11 receptions for 259 yards -- most of it in the 2nd half.
While this is an extreme example of a Falcons game last season, it is somewhat representative of 'why' Jones production was so sky high. He was the top offensive talent on a poor team that couldn't run the ball. He is a very talented player, however, I personally feel his 'impact' isn't anywhere in the same neighborhood of Dez's.
If Atlanta has a media-scout equivalent to Broaddus, I'm certain that Julio won that review. Also, if there is a thread like this on a Falcon's board, Julio is likely the "best" according to all posts.
I would be curious to know the opinion of D-Coordinators or defensive players that have faced both players.
Julio has 4.29 speed. This is how he racks up yards.It is an example where the stats don't show the true story.
I don't know if Julio is improperly used or if he lacks some ability in that area.
I know back in Irvin's day, TDs didn't tell the story. He made countless big plays that were just short of the endzone and then Emmitt came in and ran a yard or two for the TD.
Interestingly I think some on an ATL board may say Dez. As I visit other message boards throughout the season, Dez is the one player, while not well liked, gets universal respect.
On Atlanta's official site there isnt a single poster that will admit Dez is better.
I get the favoritism but there are usually of handful of "realist" or even super objective posters to balance out the homers on every board. I've never visited their board... just a thought. Like I would guess Romo would get a small number of votes comparing Ryan.
But they lost Harry Douglas who was one of the better WR3s in the NFL. It's a wash for Atlanta.
If Atlanta has a media-scout equivalent to Broaddus, I'm certain that Julio won that review. Also, if there is a thread like this on a Falcon's board, Julio is likely the "best" according to all posts.
I would be curious to know the opinion of D-Coordinators or defensive players that have faced both players.
Just to play devils advocate... Would you all feel the same way if Julio Jones was a cowboy and Dez Bryant was a falcon?
Dez is like a boulder with cleats, he's just built stronger than a lot of these receivers.
One defensive back already did. DeAngelo Hall said he would take Dez if he had one receiver he had to start a team with. He said Dez just plays the game more physically than other receivers, and he gives it all both catching passes and blocking.
For a divisional opponent to say that about you is high praise. Even the Packers defender (can't remember his name, Shields?) who was guarding Dez on the no-catch call said Dez caught the ball. I don't want to get in a debate about the call, but when opponents who have nothing to gain say good things about you and your skills, that speaks volumes.
JJ went six straight games last year without scoring a TD.
He is talented, but he is not Dez.
Hall didn't play Atlanta in 2014. The NFC East will plays against Atlanta this season. It will be interesting to see the results of the same defenses against both WRs.
I think its fair to say, as of now, we dont have a CB equal to Trufant.Hall didn't play Atlanta in 2014. The NFC East will plays against Atlanta this season. It will be interesting to see the results of the same defenses against both WRs.
Julio has 4.29 speed. This is how he racks up yards.
Yet, when compared to Dez, his TDs fall far short.
This is why I say scoring is more important.
As I pointed out with Irvin, the stat TDs by itself if misleading. The best stat for Irvin would have been how often he was the reason they were in the redzone in the 1st place. If it was basketball, Irvin's "assists" would like have been through the roof if he was credited with an assist for all the times he set Emmitt up for the score.
If you step back and look at it, you would see that it sounds like a Cowboys fan when you say that the reason Witten's TDs are low is because he is misused but on the other hand the number of TDs scored is super important when the WR on your team scores more of them that the WR he is being compared against. If Witten is misused then maybe Julio Jones is misused.
I'm certain that Atlanta fans think yards are more important than TDs for a WR.
The bottom line is it would require a lot of film study to really have a relevant opinion on the subject. I have not studied Julio Jones in depth so I can't say how he rates relative to Dez. I doubt if many fans in the debate on either side (Cowboys or Falcons) have really spent a lot of time studying the other teams WR. Broaddus did review a few games and gave Dez the nod, although it didn't appear that he thought there was a big difference overall one way or the other. Basically they have different strengths and weaknesses and there is not exact formula on how to translate those strengths/weaknesses to an absolute of who is the best.
My guess is that they end up getting paid about the same.
But the Commanders played the Falcons in 2012. So Hall would have been able to assess Jones' abilities and make a comparison.
The Commanders also played the Falcons in 2013, but Julio was injured.