DC: Mailbag: Best Route For Developing A QB? How To Address RB Spot?

[Jstopper]

Your reasoning is that no QB because they will sit on the bench and then say lets get Smith?

Meant Ramsey not Smith

 

[NeonNinja]

Meant Ramsey not Smith

Okay. What's special about Ramsey that makes him a better selection than one of the QBs at four?

 

[Jstopper]

Okay. What's special about Ramsey that makes him a better selection than one of the QBs at four?

Between him and Byron Jones we have our free safety position handled permanently. And the other can handle 1 of our cornerback spots. Get a qb in the 2nd round who can develop the same way you want our #4 pick qb to develop. He won't be playing for a few seasons

 

[NeonNinja]

Between him and Byron Jones we have our free safety position handled permanently. And the other can handle 1 of our cornerback spots. Get a qb in the 2nd round who can develop the same way you want our #4 pick qb to develop. He won't be playing for a few seasons

Fair enough. Name that second round quarterback.

 

[Jstopper]

Fair enough. Name that second round quarterback.

I like wentz, Connor cook, or hackenburg all for our 2nd pick

 

[waving monkey]

Fair enough. Name that second round quarterback.

well It wont be Wentz his already gone
goff is gone
Lynch I dont think drops that low
that leaves Cook and a few others with lesser traits

 

[waving monkey]

I like wentz, Connor cook, or hackenburg all for our 2nd pick

Wentz will be long gone
the lesser QB's will be allowable

 

[Jstopper]

Wentz will be long gone
the lesser QB's will be allowable

If wentz really is gone, then I'm fine with cook and hackenburg

 

[NeonNinja]

I like wentz, Connor cook, or hackenburg all for our 2nd pick

That doesn't help us, IMO. Wentz most likely will not be there and I see nothing in Cook that translate to franchise QB.

 

[Jstopper]

That doesn't help us, IMO. Wentz most likely will not be there and I see nothing in Cook that translate to franchise QB.

He may not be a superstar right this second but with some grooming he could be legit imo. Romo was nowhere near finished when he first came out either. Hackenburg too is a little rough around the edges but I think he could be a diamond in the rough

 

[NEODOG]

there was no bigger hole then the back up QB last year
and it lost us how many games? This #4 pick can not
only be the back up next year he can become the starter
for the future . thats good savings

It can be argued that the D lost just as many....

 

[Alexander]

I like wentz, Connor cook, or hackenburg all for our 2nd pick

Cook, Hackenberg.

{soft chuckle}

Wentz. Second round.

{hearty laugh}

 

[Jstopper]

Cook, Hackenberg.

{soft chuckle}

Wentz. Second round.

{hearty laugh}

Cook has the potential to be a franchise qb man. And he would be available for our 2nd pick. Instead of using the #4 pick with no Andrew Luck there. But hey to each his own

 

[Alexander]

Cook has the potential to be a franchise qb man.

{louder chuckle}

 

[Jstopper]

{louder chuckle}

We'll see who's laughing if we revisit this in a few years

 

[Alexander]

We'll see who's laughing if we revisit this in a few years

Make a note of it, young sportsman.

 

[KB1122]

Quarterbacks aren't developed. They're born.

 

[Oh_Canada]

If it means getting the next Claiborne versus a competent heir to Romo, you bet it does.

I agree with you for the record, but Claiborne could easily be replaced by the next Patrick Peterson and Romo's "heir" could turn out to be Ryan Leaf. I think what's important is getting the right guy regardless of position and preferably that player is Goff. If gone I would be happy with Bosa or maybe even Jack, trading down and getting Wentz would be ideal.

 

[waving monkey]

It can be argued that the D lost just as many....

It has been debated to death
lets disagree and feel good about it

 

[Alexander]

I agree with you for the record, but Claiborne could easily be replaced by the next Patrick Peterson

Who is that?