DC: NFC East Q&A: Is Romo-to-Bryant scarier than the Cowboys' offensive line?

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
NFC East Q&A: Is Romo-to-Bryant scarier than the Cowboys' offensive line?

Jun 14, 2016
i
Todd Archer ESPN Staff Writer

Today's question: What does your team fear more: the Tony Romo-to-Dez Bryant connection or the Dallas Cowboys' offensive line?

Dan Graziano: The Giants have plenty of respect for the Cowboys’ offensive line and its importance to Romo’s success, but Romo is the one who haunts their nightmares. The Giants have lost five consecutive games to Romo. (He didn’t play in the second game between the two teams last season.) It seems he usually finds a way to rip their hearts out late. After last year’s Week 1 loss, then-Giants cornerback Prince Amukamara said he was going to create a web series called “I Hate Tony Romo” because of all the times they haven’t been able to stop him when it counts. The Romo/Bryant combo is bad news for the Giants’ defense if both of those guys are healthy. New York hasn’t been able to find a way to beat them since 2012.

Phil Sheridan: That offensive line is a serious force and allows the Cowboys to do so much offensively. But I’d still say Romo-to-Bryant has to be the biggest concern for an Eagles defense that finished 28th against the pass last year and has a cloudy situation at cornerback this year. Of course, the Eagles’ focus this season is on turning their defense into an aggressive, disruptive unit. Coordinator Jim Schwartz is all about getting to the quarterback, and his wide-9 alignment can be vulnerable to the run. So the Cowboys create a pick-your-poison scenario that will challenge every defense they face.

John Keim: Can we say all of the above? I do know there were some atCommanders Park who were disappointed when Dallas took Ezekiel Elliott in the first round, and it goes back to the offensive line and Romo. I thought one offensive coach might be happy they didn’t go defense, but he was not. Why? Because the feeling was Elliott’s impact behind that line could be big, allowing the Cowboys to play like they did two years ago. Keep in mind that in his past five games against Washington, Bryant has a combined 19 catches for 300 yards and four touchdowns. Also, the Commanders like their starting corners -- Bashaud Breeland and Josh Norman -- against Bryant. They’ll have a tougher time against that line if Elliott gets motoring.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...ryant-scarier-than-the-cowboys-offensive-line
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
NFC East Q&A: Is Romo-to-Bryant scarier than the Cowboys' offensive line?

Jun 14, 2016
i
Todd Archer ESPN Staff Writer

Today's question: What does your team fear more: the Tony Romo-to-Dez Bryant connection or the Dallas Cowboys' offensive line?

Dan Graziano: The Giants have plenty of respect for the Cowboys’ offensive line and its importance to Romo’s success, but Romo is the one who haunts their nightmares. The Giants have lost five consecutive games to Romo. (He didn’t play in the second game between the two teams last season.) It seems he usually finds a way to rip their hearts out late. After last year’s Week 1 loss, then-Giants cornerback Prince Amukamara said he was going to create a web series called “I Hate Tony Romo” because of all the times they haven’t been able to stop him when it counts. The Romo/Bryant combo is bad news for the Giants’ defense if both of those guys are healthy. New York hasn’t been able to find a way to beat them since 2012.

Phil Sheridan: That offensive line is a serious force and allows the Cowboys to do so much offensively. But I’d still say Romo-to-Bryant has to be the biggest concern for an Eagles defense that finished 28th against the pass last year and has a cloudy situation at cornerback this year. Of course, the Eagles’ focus this season is on turning their defense into an aggressive, disruptive unit. Coordinator Jim Schwartz is all about getting to the quarterback, and his wide-9 alignment can be vulnerable to the run. So the Cowboys create a pick-your-poison scenario that will challenge every defense they face.

John Keim: Can we say all of the above? I do know there were some atCommanders Park who were disappointed when Dallas took Ezekiel Elliott in the first round, and it goes back to the offensive line and Romo. I thought one offensive coach might be happy they didn’t go defense, but he was not. Why? Because the feeling was Elliott’s impact behind that line could be big, allowing the Cowboys to play like they did two years ago. Keep in mind that in his past five games against Washington, Bryant has a combined 19 catches for 300 yards and four touchdowns. Also, the Commanders like their starting corners -- Bashaud Breeland and Josh Norman -- against Bryant. They’ll have a tougher time against that line if Elliott gets motoring.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...ryant-scarier-than-the-cowboys-offensive-line

Great stuff and very interesting. But it brings up a great point overall. If your not getting toasted by Romo and Dez, then you will most likely be getting toasted by Zeke. We have something that 95% of the league wont be able to stop in this offense.

Where we will have problems is teams with both a good offense and good defense. Playoff caliber teams.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
John Keim: I do know there were some atCommanders Park who were disappointed when Dallas took Ezekiel Elliott in the first round, and it goes back to the offensive line and Romo. I thought one offensive coach might be happy they didn’t go defense, but he was not. Why?
Because he coaches in the NFC East, where teams don't worry about defense until the playoffs begin.

Last Four Seasons Combined
Division W-L (NFL Rank in points allowed)
Cowboys 15-9 (23rd)
Eagles 12-12 (27th)
Skins 11-13 (29th)
Giants 10-14 (24th)

Combined playoff record: 1-4
 

Califan007

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
331
I wrote this in another thread, but Dez overall has been OK at best against the Commanders, no matter who they had at CB. I can see the Skins' coaches more concerned about Dallas' O-Line and Elliot...
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,783
Reaction score
16,658
I think they will be more concerned with elliot and even morris etc, just the run game in general
than Dez.

Dez is going to have to re prove himself, before they worry about him.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
I think they will be more concerned with elliot and even morris etc, just the run game in general
than Dez.

Dez is going to have to re prove himself, before they worry about him.

Completely agree. Zeke is going to scare the hell out of teams and it won't be long before he is the focus of defensive game plans. Dez is still dangerous, but Elliott will be the everydown threat.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,009
Reaction score
37,151
I think they will be more concerned with elliot and even morris etc, just the run game in general
than Dez.

Dez is going to have to re prove himself, before they worry about him.

I don't agree that Dez has to reprove anything. Teams know he was playing through an injury last year and Dallas didn't have Romo throwing the ball. Defensive coordinators are likely having nightmares about stopping that combo while also being able to stop the run.

If they overly focus on both, Romo will play pitch and catch with Witten. ... It would put us over the top, though, if another receiver emerges who can constantly toast single coverage.
 

fortdick

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,496
Reaction score
745
Completely agree. Zeke is going to scare the hell out of teams and it won't be long before he is the focus of defensive game plans. Dez is still dangerous, but Elliott will be the everydown threat.

Like number 22 in the last century. I hope he has that heart and impact.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
I wrote this in another thread, but Dez overall has been OK at best against the Commanders, no matter who they had at CB. I can see the Skins' coaches more concerned about Dallas' O-Line and Elliot...

I think the offense overall has struggled more against washington than ny or philly. At least since Jim Johnson Past away. I think it is a product of jim haslett having our offenses number. He is just one of those guys that knew how to attack us. He always did a very good job against Our offense.

Steve Spagnuolo on the other hand has no clue. Garrett-Romo own him. Its a crying shame the only time this guys defense ever beat us was the 07 playoff game.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
I think they will be more concerned with elliot and even morris etc, just the run game in general
than Dez.

Dez is going to have to re prove himself, before they worry about him.

People always over think it. Its all about romo. Guessing when to blitz him and from where and how to try and counter his ability to improv plays when they have guys covered. The line is excellent and Zeke has the potential to be but make no mistake its about stopping Romo and taking away his ability to improv and finding a way to cover them after they are covered.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
Didn't we beat the Commanders without Romo last year?
Didn't the Skins (playing with Colt McCoy) beat us with Romo two years ago?
The Skins tend to do pretty well against Romo.

Be that as it may, you can't separate the parts from their sum. Romo, Elliott and Dez are equally as important. Romo is a seasoned quarterback who knows how to take advantage of defensive schemes. If they load up the box, he knows how to play pitch and catch with Dez. If they sit back in coverage, he'll simply feed the ball to EZE.

You will get the most out of your offense with all three on the field. You get less out of your offense if either piece of the puzzle is missing.
 
Top