- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
If you would take Lacy at this very moment over Escobar why not back in April when he was the top rated back and a higher rated player than Escobar? How could the top rated RB not be a better choice than a pass receiving TE in the Cowboys offense? The Cowboys can throw the ball but they struggle to run it. Did you expect the Cowboys to take a TE with their #2 pick? There's a lot things we knew back in April that we know at this very moment. We knew back in April the Cowboys had a big issue with their running game and most of us predicted Murray would miss games in 2013 due to injuries. We all knew the Cowboys would be looking for a back to replace Felix and one who could step in for Murray when he got injured. I have posts on the board immediately after the draft saying Escobar wasn't going to be very productive playing with Witten.
I certainly wasn't going out on a limb Witten has only missed one game due to injury his entire career so Escobar wasn't going to get many opportunities in the passing game. I could have told you back in April that Lacy would be productive spelling Murray and taking over for him when he got injured which I knew was inevitable. Most thought prior to the season that Hanna would be more productive than Escobar in 2013 seeing he showed some potential in 2012 and had one season under his belt. Most of us knew the running game was still going to be an issue in 2013 so Lacy would have been an excellent choice in the second round and the Cowboys could have moved down 13 spots to get him.
Was Lacy ranked higher than Escobar on the Cowboy's board?