joseephuss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,041
- Reaction score
- 6,920
I saw a post earlier about the WCO is what caused the 46 defense to go away. I don't agree with that. The Bears just could not find players to replace Dent, Hampton, McMichael, Singletary and whomever else on that defense. Any scheme is only as good at the players that run it. The 46 scheme is just one that is more difficult to find the personnel to run it. Some schemes are easier to run than others. It can sometimes be easier to run a Cover 2 scheme than anything else. That is what we hear about the 3-4. That it is easier to find guys that fit it than the 4-3.
If you don't get the right players, then the 46 defense probably has more holes in it than other schemes. It seems like a high risk, high reward type of scheme. When you don't have the players, you end up losing on the risks than winning.
I would say the 46 is one of those schemes that is very difficult to run unless you have the perfect personnel. The 85 Bears had it, but few other teams do. Especially to that level. I think the Flex defense is the same way. It would be difficult to find the right players to run a version of the Flex in today's NFL.
The WCO is the same way on the other side of the ball. Many teams can run it, but few can have the success as a team with Montana and Rice. Or Norv Turner's timing offense with The Triplets and Novacek and that O-line.
If you don't get the right players, then the 46 defense probably has more holes in it than other schemes. It seems like a high risk, high reward type of scheme. When you don't have the players, you end up losing on the risks than winning.
I would say the 46 is one of those schemes that is very difficult to run unless you have the perfect personnel. The 85 Bears had it, but few other teams do. Especially to that level. I think the Flex defense is the same way. It would be difficult to find the right players to run a version of the Flex in today's NFL.
The WCO is the same way on the other side of the ball. Many teams can run it, but few can have the success as a team with Montana and Rice. Or Norv Turner's timing offense with The Triplets and Novacek and that O-line.