Defense with the first two or three picks and an RB with the next. Let DeMarco get paid and go fumble in Cleveland.
Not following your logic at all. Like 80% of the backfields in the league, it will be some sort of a RB by committee, but there's certainly nothing wrong with going into the season with a rookie as your primary back. If you're going to go out and pay a FA, you might as well cough up the money for Murray. This draft is about as rich in RB's as you can ask for.
By the way, there's nothing "small" about Murray. 220 is plenty big for an RB by any standard.
Fumble was ball game. Pay him the vet minimum or slam the door behind him.
They should absolutely try and re-sign him, they'd be crazy not to, but there's no way in hell that they should go out of their way to make it happen. I'd like to think that the Cowboys learned their lesson with the whole Barber III debacle. Murray had a great year, but he's not a special talent like Lynch or Peterson.He's never had a fumbling problem until this year and hadn't fumbled in the last 9 games and fumbled when one of the best athletes in football in the last 20 years made a phenomenal play.
I'm not saying give him a giant contract, but we would be dumb as dumb can be to not try and re-sign him for a good deal.
YR
Fumble was ball game. Pay him the vet minimum or slam the door behind him.
They should absolutely try and re-sign him, they'd be crazy not to, but there's no way in hell that they should go out of their way to make it happen. I'd like to think that the Cowboys learned their lesson with the whole Barber III debacle. Murray had a great year, but he's not a special talent like Lynch or Peterson.
Fumble was ball game. Pay him the vet minimum or slam the door behind him.
I would take Murray over Peterson. Peterson just isn't much in pass protection or receiving.
Barber was a different tailback. He was never the starter and they wanted him to be the starter. And he relied on being a punishing back instead of being elusive. I still think re-signing Dez is a larger priority, but I want Murray back as well. I think it really comes down to how long the contract is for. And I would hate re-signing Dez and franchising Murray.
YR
We'll have to agree to disagree on Peterson vs. Murray.
Murray will likely want to be amongst the highest paid RB's in the league, and rightfully so. I'm not comfortable being the team that meets those demands, especially with a draft this deep coming up. We have far too many players going into free agency this year to break the bank on both Bryant and Murray.
Not going to comment about his future right now (though vet-minimum is, of course, ridiculous), but that fumble was a backbreaker today. A bigger play than the overturn, even.
Yes that fumble really turned the game. Wd were going up 15 there
Murray is going to have injury issues next season
I don't want to resign him
Murray lost a lot of negotiation room on that fumble with me. Potential knockout play and you drop the ball.
It's not like Peterson hasn't had a fumbling problem in his career.
I think in his prime (which Peterson is past), Peterson was the better pure runner. But, he is lousy in protection and as a receiver. That's why the Vikings drafted Toby Gerhart and took Peterson out of games on 3rd and long.
Every team in the league finds ways to keep guys on their team thru signing contracts and restructuring deals properly. I don't know why we can't.
YR