Irvin88_4life
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,509
- Reaction score
- 26,396
I think it could have been addressed more. There's no question Martin is going to be a good player, but we had/have an absolutely horrific front 7 the last two years. Martin may make sense down the line, but there is no arguing that (for once) the O-line was in significantly better shape than the DLine going into this draft. A 1st round OG was not ideal in this situation.
Looking at 7th rounders who should have been 5th rounders or whatever is great and all, but that fact is they were not considered to be players that will impact in year 1, and probably not even in year 2 that's why they dropped to day 3.. To say they in any way go to "fixing" the defense for 2014 is a huge stretch, Going by history even Lawrence will probably not be a significant contributor in his rookie year at 21. They all may have a great impact down the road, who knows, but the excitement is too high IMO for RD 7 guys because they happen to be good value there.
I like a lot of the picks, I dislike the trade for Lawrence and vehemently dislike the Hitchenson pick. But the question was "Is the defense fixed". At least for 2014, I could make a solid argument that even with an average amount of normal NFL injuries, it might actually be worse. And unless some people surprise significantly to the upside, it won't be much better.
I hate to say it but yes our OL played better but Leary might not play much longer, Free might go back to his usual play. We have no depth on the interior. Yes OL was a need, now that being said DL is a bigger need yes but no DL was rated higher at our pick, no trade down we take Martin. How can people hate building the trenches